Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 97656 - dbus compile breaks with new pyrex build
Summary: dbus compile breaks with new pyrex build
Status: RESOLVED INVALID
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: [OLD] Development (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High normal (vote)
Assignee: foser (RETIRED)
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
: 98973 99338 99463 99622 99637 99727 100413 100909 101003 101419 101961 102524 103466 103804 104777 105102 105126 105936 111193 112219 113450 117581 119200 120246 139288 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2005-07-01 13:51 UTC by greg
Modified: 2006-07-05 04:03 UTC (History)
25 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description greg 2005-07-01 13:51:04 UTC
The newest testing build of pyrex causes dbus to break at 'dbus_bindings' 

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.emerge the testing pyrex  
2.emerge dbus 
 
  
Actual Results:  
The dbus compile didn't compile dbus_bindings 

Expected Results:  
The dbus compile should have properly finished.
Comment 1 Glenn L. McGrath 2005-07-12 17:38:07 UTC
/usr/bin/python extract.py dbus_bindings.pyx.in -I..  > dbus_bindings.pyx
running echo '#include "dbus_h_wrapper.h"
'|cpp  -I..pyrexc dbus_bindings.pyx
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/bin/pyrexc", line 7, in ?
    from Pyrex.Compiler.Main import main
ImportError: No module named Pyrex.Compiler.Main
make[3]: [dbus_bindings.c] Error 1 (ignored)
if /bin/sh ../libtool --mode=compile x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.
-I. -I.. -I.. -I../dbus  -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include
-I/usr/include/libxml2   -I/usr/include/python2.4 
-DDBUS_API_SUBJECT_TO_CHANGE=1   -march=athlon64 -O2 -pipe -Wall
-Wchar-subscripts -Wmissing-declarations -Wmissing-prototypes -Wnested-externs
-Wpointer-arith -Wcast-align -Wfloat-equal -Wsign-compare -MT dbus_bindings.lo
-MD -MP -MF ".deps/dbus_bindings.Tpo" -c -o dbus_bindings.lo dbus_bindings.c; \
then mv -f ".deps/dbus_bindings.Tpo" ".deps/dbus_bindings.Plo"; else rm -f
".deps/dbus_bindings.Tpo"; exit 1; fi
mkdir .libs
 x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I.. -I../dbus
-I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/libxml2
-I/usr/include/python2.4 -DDBUS_API_SUBJECT_TO_CHANGE=1 -march=athlon64 -O2
-pipe -Wall -Wchar-subscripts -Wmissing-declarations -Wmissing-prototypes
-Wnested-externs -Wpointer-arith -Wcast-align -Wfloat-equal -Wsign-compare -MT
dbus_bindings.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/dbus_bindings.Tpo -c dbus_bindings.c  -fPIC
-DPIC -o .libs/dbus_bindings.o
x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc: dbus_bindings.c: No such file or directory
x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc: no input files
make[3]: *** [dbus_bindings.lo] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/dbus-0.23.4/work/dbus-0.23.4/python'
make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/dbus-0.23.4/work/dbus-0.23.4/python'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/dbus-0.23.4/work/dbus-0.23.4'
make: *** [all] Error 2
Comment 2 foser (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-07-13 10:08:21 UTC
what version of pyrex are you referring to ? Also, does downgrading or disabling
of docs generation solve this problem ?
Comment 3 Glenn L. McGrath 2005-07-13 17:32:30 UTC
I re-emerged pyrex 0.9.3-r2 and dbus compiles now.

My guess is that pyrex was broken due to some related python maintenance issues.
Comment 4 Phil Richards 2005-07-14 00:49:35 UTC
I've had the same problem - looking at the emerge output, it is clear that pyrex
was still under python2.3 site-packages; reemerging put it under 2.4.

I suspect I forgot to run python-updater on the latest python upgrade :-)

I still hate the way that important messages disappear in the morass of build
information (and, yes, I do keep the logs, but tend to forget to look at them :-()
Comment 5 foser (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-07-14 03:10:30 UTC
*** Bug 98973 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 6 foser (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-07-14 03:12:22 UTC
I guess that closes this one.
Comment 7 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-07-17 10:19:33 UTC
*** Bug 99338 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 8 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-07-18 14:09:12 UTC
*** Bug 99463 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 9 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-07-20 00:39:22 UTC
*** Bug 99622 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 10 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-07-20 01:58:27 UTC
*** Bug 99637 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 11 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-07-20 15:13:18 UTC
*** Bug 99727 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 12 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-07-26 15:01:45 UTC
*** Bug 100413 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 13 Neil Stone 2005-07-26 15:55:42 UTC
that was obvoius..... NOT !!!

Any chance important things like this could be emailed to a given user ??
Comment 14 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-07-31 10:29:18 UTC
*** Bug 100909 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 15 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-08-01 09:57:43 UTC
*** Bug 101003 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 16 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-08-05 03:49:15 UTC
*** Bug 101419 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 17 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-08-10 03:34:00 UTC
*** Bug 101961 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 18 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-08-14 11:55:22 UTC
*** Bug 102524 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 19 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-08-23 08:32:49 UTC
*** Bug 103466 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 20 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-08-26 02:33:39 UTC
*** Bug 103804 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 21 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-09-04 03:23:19 UTC
*** Bug 104777 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 22 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-09-07 00:41:13 UTC
*** Bug 105102 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 23 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-09-07 02:43:31 UTC
*** Bug 105126 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 24 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-09-14 02:27:30 UTC
*** Bug 105936 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 25 Steev Klimaszewski (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-11-01 21:23:47 UTC
*** Bug 111193 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 26 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-11-11 13:18:35 UTC
*** Bug 112219 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 27 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-11-24 04:19:22 UTC
*** Bug 113450 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 28 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-01-03 05:19:27 UTC
*** Bug 117581 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 29 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-01-16 08:31:40 UTC
*** Bug 119200 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 30 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-01-24 23:58:57 UTC
*** Bug 120246 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 31 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-07-05 04:03:54 UTC
*** Bug 139288 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***