Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 94959 - upgrading gcc causes emerge failure (cant find libstdc++.so.X)
Summary: upgrading gcc causes emerge failure (cant find libstdc++.so.X)
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: [OLD] Development (show other bugs)
Hardware: x86 Linux
: Highest blocker (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo Toolchain Maintainers
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
: 93125 95013 95050 95062 95117 95261 95589 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2005-06-03 15:11 UTC by Robert T Childers
Modified: 2005-06-09 17:22 UTC (History)
10 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Robert T Childers 2005-06-03 15:11:10 UTC
After doing an upgrade to my system from gcc-3.4.3-20050110 to gcc-3.4.4 it
caused  the next package to be emerged to fail. I tried using the
fix_libtool_files.sh script but my memory was a bit off and I gave it the new
arch instead of the old. I typed fix_libtool_files.sh 3.4.4. Since this didn't
work I typed fix_libtool_files.sh and got the help message. At this point I
tried fix_libtool_files.sh 3.4.3-20050110 no success I also tried it with 3.4.3,
3.4.3-20050110-r2 and 3.4.3-20050110-r1. At this point any attempt to use
gcc-config to change to gcc-3.4.4 fails. And gcc-config -l list gcc-3.3.5 and
3.4.4 but no 3.4.3-20050110. I assume this is because minor changes are
unmerged. But it has no marker next to any version listed showing me to not have
any gcc set. also emerge fails always with the error message that it can't find
libstdc++.so.6. I did verify that the file does exist in the 3.4.4 directory. I
am typing this on the second machine so I can't get an accurate emerge info
since the emerge command fails.

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.emerge gcc-3.4.4
2.fix_libtool_files.sh 3.4.4
3.fix_libtool_files.sh 3.4.3-20050110-r2

Actual Results:  
As stated above the system will not even execute an emerge. If you know how I
can from this partialy broken system fix it to the point that I can run
gcc-config and emerge again I would appreciate and answer.

Expected Results:  
System shouldn't have misplaced the links to the libstdc++.so.6 file.

Cannot give you an emerge info from the affected system since emerge is no
longer working.
Comment 1 Daniel Drake (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-06-03 16:39:35 UTC
Same here. I upgraded from 3.4.3-20050110 to 3.4.4

I've lost the context but here are the errors I recorded.

I think these ones appeared at the start of the next emerge:

/usr/bin/gcc-config: line 496: /etc/env.d/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu-3.4.3-20050110:
No such file or directory
* /usr/bin/gcc-config: Profile does not exist or invalid setting for
/etc/env.d/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu-3.4.3-20050110
/etc/env.d/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu-3.4.3-20050110 doesnt exist

I tried using gcc-config to select a different compiler
      dsd ~ # gcc-config 1
       * Switching to i686-pc-linux-gnu-3.3.5-20050130 compiler ...
      /usr/bin/python: error while loading shared libraries: libstdc++.so.6:
cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
       * /usr/bin/gcc-config: Could not get portage CHOST!
      /usr/bin/gcc-config: line 81: env: command not found
       * /usr/bin/gcc-config: Could not get portage CHOST!
      /usr/bin/python: error while loading shared libraries: libstdc++.so.6:
cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
       * /usr/bin/gcc-config: Could not get portage CHOST!
      /usr/bin/python: error while loading shared libraries: libstdc++.so.6:
cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
       * /usr/bin/gcc-config: Could not get portage CHOST!
      /usr/bin/python: error while loading shared libraries: libstdc++.so.6:
cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
       * /usr/bin/gcc-config: Could not get portage CHOST!                     
[ ok ]
       * If you intend to use the gcc from the new profile in an already
       * running shell, please remember to do:
       *   # source /etc/profile 

The workaround:
Edit /etc/ld.so.conf, adding the correct path to the directory containing
libstdc++.so.6, then re-run gcc-config.
Comment 2 Daniel Drake (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-06-03 16:40:21 UTC
Correction. Edit /etc/ld.so.conf, adding the correct path to the directory
containing libstdc++.so.6, then run ldconfig, then run gcc-config.
Comment 3 Doug Goldstein (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-06-03 16:43:28 UTC
ok well lemme try to explain this a little better...

essentially I grabbed a 2005.0 stage3. did the following
tar -jxpf stage3*
chroot /mnt/gentoo /bin/bash
env-update
source /etc/profile
emerge --sync
emerge gentoo-sources
emerge -auDv world

after a handful of other ebuilds... python merged then gcc and then glibc was
suppose to merge but here's where problem strikes.

 * Checking gcc for __thread support ... no

 * Could not find a gcc that supports the __thread directive!
 * please update to gcc-3.2.2-r1 or later, and try again.

We know that's baloney cause the 2005.0 stage3 has gcc 3.3.5.

So I tried to give it a little env-update love...

# env-update
/usr/bin/python: error while loading shared libraries: libstdc++.so.5: cannot
open shared object file: No such file or directory

Well obviously gcc-config and env-update didn't update the environment correctly.


So...

# gcc-config 1
 * Switching to i686-pc-linux-gnu-3.3.5-20050130 compiler...
/usr/bin/python: error while loading shared libraries: libstdc++.so.5: cannot
open shared object file: No such file or directory
 * /usr/bin/gcc-config: Could not get portage CHOST!
/usr/bin/gcc-config: line 1: env: command not found
 * /usr/bin/gcc-config: Could not get portage CHOST!
/usr/bin/python: error while loading shared libraries: libstdc++.so.5: cannot
open shared object file: No such file or directory
 * /usr/bin/gcc-config: Could not get portage CHOST!
/usr/bin/python: error while loading shared libraries: libstdc++.so.5: cannot
open shared object file: No such file or directory
 * /usr/bin/gcc-config: Could not get portage CHOST!
/usr/bin/python: error while loading shared libraries: libstdc++.so.5: cannot
open shared object file: No such file or directory
 * /usr/bin/gcc-config: Could not get portage CHOST!                      [ ok ]
 * If you intend to use the gcc from the new profile in an already
 * running shell, please remember to do:

 *   # source /etc/profile


And here we have it... /etc/ld.so.conf still points to the old gcc location.
Modifying this to the correct updated location and then running ldconfig.
Followed by an immediate gcc-config 1 and env-update and source /etc/profile is
the only way to recover from this..

Not too good for a fresh out of the box x86 install following the 2005.0
handbook using the 2005.0 stages.. :(

Daniel Drake confirms a similar issue but I believe he's going to post his stuff
here.
Comment 4 SpanKY gentoo-dev 2005-06-03 16:46:16 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 84961 ***
Comment 5 Robert T Childers 2005-06-03 17:13:57 UTC
Thanks for the information. I was able to get the second box back up and
running. I am in the process of upgrading my primary box at the moment. Just to
make things a little easier on myself I am upgrading just GCC at first so I can
verify my paths. I forgot about /etc/ld.so.conf . Its not a file that I manually
handle because of emerge's scripts. So once again, I thank you all for you
knowledge of unix in general and linux and gentoo in particular.
Comment 6 Marien Zwart (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-06-04 05:44:54 UTC
I'm pretty sure this is not a duplicate of bug 84961. Notice how dsd got this
with libstdc++.so.6. I'm pretty sure this bug is about /etc/ld.so.conf not
getting the right path to libstdc++.so.whatever, which breaks some pythons, not
people removing libstdc++-v3 while python still uses it.
Comment 7 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-06-04 14:03:49 UTC
I also can
Comment 8 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-06-04 14:03:49 UTC
I also can´t see how it this a duplicate. Reopened.
Comment 9 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-06-04 14:04:16 UTC
*** Bug 95062 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 10 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-06-04 14:06:07 UTC
*** Bug 95013 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 11 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-06-04 14:08:51 UTC
Also not limited to gcc-3.4 (Bug 95013), failes with gcc-3.3.5.20050130-r1 as well.
Comment 12 Mark Knecht 2005-06-04 18:51:03 UTC
I've gotten hit by this. Brand new machine x86 built today. Essentially emerge
system killed it I think. How can this happen on the stable branch? 

Anyway, mine is more like Bug 95050 so maybe someone should mark that bug as a
duplicate of this one.

I tried Doug's instructions as best I could by modifying them for my version:

"And here we have it... /etc/ld.so.conf still points to the old gcc location.
Modifying this to the correct updated location and then running ldconfig.
Followed by an immediate gcc-config 1 and env-update and source /etc/profile is
the only way to recover from this.."

1) I added the last line:
# ld.so.conf autogenerated by env-update; make all changes to
# contents of /etc/env.d directory
/usr/local/lib
/usr/i686-pc-linux-gnu/lib
/usr/lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.3.5
/usr/lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.3.5-20050130/libstdc++.so.5

2) I then ran ldconfig, but at the gcc-config 1 step it fights back so obviously
I'm not doing this right:

localhost root # gcc-config 1
 * Switching to i686-pc-linux-gnu-3.3.5-20050130 compiler...
/usr/bin/python: error while loading shared libraries: libstdc++.so.5: cannot
open shared object file: No such file or directory
 * /usr/bin/gcc-config: Could not get portage CHOST!
/usr/bin/gcc-config: line 1: env: command not found
 * /usr/bin/gcc-config: Could not get portage CHOST!
/usr/bin/python: error while loading shared libraries: libstdc++.so.5: cannot
open shared object file: No such file or directory
 * /usr/bin/gcc-config: Could not get portage CHOST!
/usr/bin/python: error while loading shared libraries: libstdc++.so.5: cannot
open shared object file: No such file or directory
 * /usr/bin/gcc-config: Could not get portage CHOST!
/usr/bin/python: error while loading shared libraries: libstdc++.so.5: cannot
open shared object file: No such file or directory
 * /usr/bin/gcc-config: Could not get portage CHOST!                           
            [ ok ]
 * If you intend to use the gcc from the new profile in an already
 * running shell, please remember to do:

 *   # source /etc/profile

localhost root #

Since this is aq brand new machine is there some way I can just load all the
portage stuff off the CD again to recover, or has it gone too far for that to
work now?
Comment 13 Adam Scheblein 2005-06-04 20:38:50 UTC
error:
/usr/bin/python: error while loading shared libraries: libstdc++.so.5: cannot
open shared object file: No such file or directory

workaround:
edit /etc/env.d/05gcc changing all version numbers to 3.4.4
move  /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-linux-gnu/[oldversion] to 3.4.4
run source /etc/profile
run LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.4.4/ env-update
Comment 14 Adam Scheblein 2005-06-04 21:38:49 UTC
additional steps to fix the 3.4.4 libstdc++.so.6 missing bug:
link libstdc++.so.6.0.3 files from /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.4.4/ to
/usr/lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.4.4/libstdc++.so.6 and libstdc++.so and
also link them to /usr/lib
then run env-update

this fix was used when the libstdc++.so.6 is missing bug for kde-libs 3.4.1
Comment 15 pee 2005-06-05 07:38:09 UTC
My aborted emerge log. Python -> gcc-config -> gcc -> (dead). Might help
track stuff down.

1117859666:  >>> emerge (6 of 156) dev-lang/python-2.3.5 to /
1117859666:  === (6 of 156) Cleaning
(dev-lang/python-2.3.5::/usr/portage/dev-lang/python/python-2.3.5.ebuild)
1117859667:  === (6 of 156) Compiling/Merging
(dev-lang/python-2.3.5::/usr/portage/dev-lang/python/python-2.3.5.ebuild)
1117859856:  === (6 of 156) Post-Build Cleaning
(dev-lang/python-2.3.5::/usr/portage/dev-lang/python/python-2.3.5.ebuild)
1117859857:  >>> AUTOCLEAN: dev-lang/python
1117859862: === Unmerging... (dev-lang/python-2.3.4-r1)
1117859864:  >>> unmerge success: dev-lang/python-2.3.4-r1
1117859865:  ::: completed emerge (6 of 156) dev-lang/python-2.3.5 to /
1117859865:  >>> emerge (7 of 156) sys-devel/gcc-config-1.3.10-r2 to /
1117859865:  === (7 of 156) Cleaning
(sys-devel/gcc-config-1.3.10-r2::/usr/portage/sys-devel/gcc-config/gcc-config-1.3.10-r2.ebuild)
1117859866:  === (7 of 156) Compiling/Merging
(sys-devel/gcc-config-1.3.10-r2::/usr/portage/sys-devel/gcc-config/gcc-config-1.3.10-r2.ebuild)
1117859876:  === (7 of 156) Post-Build Cleaning
(sys-devel/gcc-config-1.3.10-r2::/usr/portage/sys-devel/gcc-config/gcc-config-1.3.10-r2.ebuild)
1117859877:  >>> AUTOCLEAN: sys-devel/gcc-config
1117859882: === Unmerging... (sys-devel/gcc-config-1.3.8-r4)
1117859885:  >>> unmerge success: sys-devel/gcc-config-1.3.8-r4
1117859886:  ::: completed emerge (7 of 156) sys-devel/gcc-config-1.3.10-r2 to /
1117859886:  >>> emerge (8 of 156) sys-devel/gcc-3.3.5.20050130-r1 to /
1117859886:  === (8 of 156) Cleaning
(sys-devel/gcc-3.3.5.20050130-r1::/usr/portage/sys-devel/gcc/gcc-3.3.5.20050130-r1.ebuild)
1117859887:  === (8 of 156) Compiling/Merging
(sys-devel/gcc-3.3.5.20050130-r1::/usr/portage/sys-devel/gcc/gcc-3.3.5.20050130-r1.ebuild)
1117861190:  === (8 of 156) Post-Build Cleaning
(sys-devel/gcc-3.3.5.20050130-r1::/usr/portage/sys-devel/gcc/gcc-3.3.5.20050130-r1.ebuild)
1117861204:  >>> AUTOCLEAN: sys-devel/gcc
1117861209: === Unmerging... (sys-devel/gcc-3.3.5-r1)
1117861223:  >>> unmerge success: sys-devel/gcc-3.3.5-r1
1117861223:  ::: completed emerge (8 of 156) sys-devel/gcc-3.3.5.20050130-r1 to /
1117861223:  >>> emerge (9 of 156) dev-util/dialog-1.0.20050206 to /
1117861223:  === (9 of 156) Cleaning
(dev-util/dialog-1.0.20050206::/usr/portage/dev-util/dialog/dialog-1.0.20050206.ebuild)
1117861224:  === (9 of 156) Compiling/Merging
(dev-util/dialog-1.0.20050206::/usr/portage/dev-util/dialog/dialog-1.0.20050206.ebuild)
1117861225:  *** terminating.
Comment 16 Daniel Drake (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-06-05 08:54:59 UTC
Confirmed on an x86 system going from 3.3.5 to 3.3.5.20050130

Mark: /etc/ld.so.conf should only contain paths, so add the path of the parent
directory, not the full path to the .so file itself.
Comment 17 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-06-05 10:48:50 UTC
(In reply to comment #15)
> Confirmed on an x86 system going from 3.3.5 to 3.3.5.20050130

Hmm, eclass is broken? Never have had such issues before. :/
Comment 18 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-06-05 11:34:31 UTC
*** Bug 95117 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 19 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-06-05 11:37:36 UTC
*** Bug 95050 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 20 Daniel Drake (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-06-05 12:33:21 UTC
Explanation of the problem:

python is compiled by default against libstdc++.so.X.
During a gcc upgrade of the same SLOT, the path to libstdc++.so.X changes.
Presumably there is python magic involved to handle the path changes, however
python cannot run because it can't find libstdc++.so.X - this is where
everything breaks.

I've looked into fixing this but I'm not exactly sure what to do and I don't
want to break anything further. Here's the relevant IRC conversation if it is of
any use:

19:40 <@SpanKY> dsd_: building python with C++ support is just asking for
trouble (and hey
                look, it is causing trouble)
19:42 <@dsd_> SpanKY: its more than that
19:43 <@dsd_> SpanKY: if you correct the paths in ld.so.conf then things start
working
19:43 <@dsd_> its not automatically changing from 3.3.5 to 3.3.5-20050130 or
whatever
19:43 <@SpanKY> *shrug*
19:43 <@dsd_> or is that because python breaks at that point in time..?
19:43 <@dsd_> its affecting every single stage1 installation and gcc upgrade
19:44 <@dsd_> !meta python
19:44 <+jeeves> dsd_: Package: dev-lang/python  Herd: python Maintainer:
liquidx@gentoo.org
19:44 <@dsd_> i'll see if we can get nocxx temporarily forced on
19:45 <@kloeri_> dsd_: forcing nocxx is fine but doesn't really solve gcc being
broken..
19:46 <@dsd_> kloeri_: it does, i think
19:46 <@kloeri_> dsd_: I've been through many gcc updates without any troubles
19:47 <@kloeri_> dsd_: so I haven't seen that happen myself at least
19:47 <@dsd_> kloeri_: which version of python is installed, and which USE flags?
19:48 <@dsd_> kloeri_: when did you last upgrade gcc, and does "ldd $(which
python)" include
              libstdc++.so.X ?
19:48 <@kloeri_> dsd_: all the different python version on several different
archs - all
                 with -nocxx
19:48 <@kloeri_> dsd_: 10 hours ago and yes :)
19:50 <@kloeri_> dsd_: I upgraded from gcc-3.3.2 to 3.4.4
19:55 <+hydrogen> kloeri_, what I asked dsd_, and I am not quite sure of this,
but the
                  problem would not have appeared for you because 3.4.4 was in a
different
                  slot, so you did not lose the 3.3.x links, therefore not
breaking it,
                  correct?
19:56 <@kloeri_> hydrogen: could be.. but I've done quite a few
upgrades/downgrades between
                 3.3.2 and 3.3.5 as well


19:58 <@Flameeyes> when you install <gcc3.4.4 you also get libstdc++-v3, which
is added to
                   the search path
19:59 <@Flameeyes> so when you change gcc you doesn't lost libstdc++.so.5 anyway


edit: note that the above isn't relevent, when you experience this bug in the
gcc-3.4 slot it complains about libstdc++.so.6

20:02 <@dsd_> Kugelfang: correct.  but during an upgrade from 3.3.x to 3.3.y,
the path to
              libstdc++.so.5 changes
20:02 <@Kugelfang> yes
20:02 <@dsd_> (i guess) there is python magic in place to update the paths
20:03 <@dsd_> but since python is compiled against that file in the first place
it fails
20:03 <@dsd_> making more sense now
20:03 <@Flameeyes> dsd_, the solution can be running env-update *before*
unmerging the old
                   version
20:03 <@Kugelfang> dsd_: well then the ebuild should issue
                   LD_LIBRARY_PATH=${new_path_to_libstdc++.so.5} gcc-config 1
20:03 <@Flameeyes> Kugelfang, no, env-update, gcc-config isn't needed
20:03 <@Kugelfang> or LD_LIBRARY_PATH="..:" env-update
20:04 <@Kugelfang> Flameeyes: right...
20:04 <@Flameeyes> [the other is to build python with nocxx :P]


Could one of the toolchain maintainers please look into this? It is breaking
every stage1 install and gcc upgrade (where the upgrade exists in the same slot).
Comment 21 Daniel Drake (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-06-05 12:36:11 UTC
CCing python maintainer for information reasons (although I don't think
enforcing nocxx is a good solution...)
Comment 22 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-06-05 12:49:58 UTC
(In reply to comment #19)

I
Comment 23 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-06-05 12:49:58 UTC
(In reply to comment #19)

I´m pretty sure it worked without a hitch a few weeks ago (and even a few days
ago!) - so the error must be somewhere else then in python. 
Comment 24 Daniel Drake (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-06-05 12:56:45 UTC
This is what appears at the end of a (broken) gcc merge .. nothing really of
interest

--- !empty dir /lib/rcscripts/awk
--- !empty dir /lib/rcscripts
--- !empty dir /lib
--- !empty dir /etc/env.d/gcc
--- !empty dir /etc
 * Scanning libtool files for hardcoded gcc library paths...
/usr/bin/python: error while loading shared libraries: libstdc++.so.5: cannot
open shared object file: No such file or directory
:0: assertion failed: (/usr/bin/portageq envvar 'CHOST') | getline CHOST
 * Scanning libtool files for hardcoded gcc library paths...
/usr/bin/python: error while loading shared libraries: libstdc++.so.5: cannot
open shared object file: No such file or directory
:0: assertion failed: (/usr/bin/portageq envvar 'CHOST') | getline CHOST
>>> Regenerating /etc/ld.so.cache...
 * Caching service dependencies...
Comment 25 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-06-05 14:31:26 UTC
Bug 93125 can probably give a more accurate picture about when this started to
get broken.
Comment 26 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-06-05 14:35:59 UTC
*** Bug 93125 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 27 Daniel Drake (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-06-05 14:37:26 UTC
I think I have a fix.. Need to test it.. Give me 25 mins.
Comment 28 Daniel Drake (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-06-05 15:00:09 UTC
I believe a mistake is here:

http://www.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/eclass/toolchain.eclass?r1=1.162&r2=1.160

Behaviour has been changed, look at the bottom hunk (should_we_gcc_config)

However, changing this back to "|| return 1" hasn't solved the problem either. :(
Comment 29 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-06-05 15:23:29 UTC
(In reply to comment #26)

What about this one:

http://www.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/eclass/toolchain.eclass?r1=1.162&r2=1.161
Comment 30 Daniel Drake (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-06-05 15:27:46 UTC
What specifically about it? That diff is included inside mine. I posted the diff
between 1.160 and 1.162, and you follow up with the diff between 1.161 and 1.162
...?
Comment 31 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-06-05 15:31:31 UTC
(In reply to comment #28)
> What specifically about it? 

Look at should_we_gcc_config() - just an idea
Comment 32 Daniel Drake (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-06-05 15:40:21 UTC
Sorry if I'm being slow. What exactly are you pointing out? I can't see how it
is has different consequences from the diff that I posted. Both 1.161 and 1.162
give different behaviour for ROOT=/ compared to 1.160
Comment 33 Daniel Drake (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-06-05 16:37:53 UTC
Comment #26 does solve this. The reason it failed is because downgrading gcc is
broken, but thats another issue, for tomorrow.

gcc upgrades and stage1 installs will now be working - the fix is committed to CVS.
Comment 34 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-06-06 13:50:41 UTC
*** Bug 95261 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 35 SpanKY gentoo-dev 2005-06-09 17:22:17 UTC
*** Bug 95589 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***