Bug List: (This bug is not in your last search results)   Show last search results      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 94559
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Gentoo Linux bug wranglers <bug-wranglers@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: tuXXer <bs.net@gmx.de>
Add CC:
CC:
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 94559 depends on: Show dependency tree
Bug 94559 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug


Description:   Opened: 2005-05-30 15:00 0000
Well trying to do my weekly "emerge -Du world" leads to dependency problems.
This is because webapp-config-1.10-r4 was removed from portage. But several
ebuild uses the webapp.eclass and here DEPEND reads DEPEND="$DEPEND
>=net-www/webapp-config-1.10-r14 app-portage/gentoolkit". The current version
of webapp-config is 1.10-r11 which is lower! Please, could you solve this
problem? Thank you.

------- Comment #1 From Jakub Moc (RETIRED) 2005-05-30 15:39:48 0000 -------
You probably meant -r14, not -r4. No, it won

------- Comment #2 From Jakub Moc (RETIRED) 2005-05-30 15:39:48 0000 -------
You probably meant -r14, not -r4. No, it won´t be added back due to the reasons
stated in ChangeLog. 

webapp-config-1.11 (30 May 2005)

  30 May 2005; Stuart Herbert <stuart@gentoo.org>
  -webapp-config-1.10-r14.ebuild, +webapp-config-1.11.ebuild:
  Removed 1.10-r14 (dangerously broken)
  Added 1.11 (includes fixes for all known security problems, and most bugs)

webapp.eclass needs an urgent fix or 1.11 must be marked stable.

------- Comment #3 From tuXXer 2005-05-31 01:30:44 0000 -------
Indeed I mean -r14 (s/r4/r14/gi). Sorry my fault. Well your suggestion is what
I'd in mind when posting. Either a stable webapp-config version greater than
1.10-r14 or a lesser dependency in webapp.eclass...

------- Comment #4 From Peter Westwood 2005-05-31 01:41:50 0000 -------
I think you need to do an `emerge sync` and it will all be fixed - the current
webapp.eclass has no version number in the DEPEND string -
http://www.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/eclass/webapp.eclass?rev=1.31&view=markup

------- Comment #5 From Jakub Moc (RETIRED) 2005-05-31 02:00:42 0000 -------
(In reply to comment #3)
> I think you need to do an `emerge sync` and it will all be fixed - the current
> webapp.eclass has no version number in the DEPEND string -

Yes, it

------- Comment #6 From Jakub Moc (RETIRED) 2005-05-31 02:00:42 0000 -------
(In reply to comment #3)
> I think you need to do an `emerge sync` and it will all be fixed - the current
> webapp.eclass has no version number in the DEPEND string -

Yes, it´s fixed now, nevertheless it was broken at the time this bug was reported.

@tuXXer - please, don´t change assignment of bugs for no apparent reason, the
bug was assigned correctly. Thanks.

Marking as FIXED.

------- Comment #7 From tuXXer 2005-05-31 04:47:25 0000 -------
Changing an assignment??? I didn't change anything, I only replied to your
comment... But in one of the mail it says:

carlo@gentoo.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|bug-wranglers@gentoo.org    |web-apps@gentoo.org

------- Comment #8 From Jakub Moc (RETIRED) 2005-05-31 13:00:15 0000 -------
(In reply to comment #5)
> Changing an assignment??? I didn't change anything, 

Hmm, something is pretty weird then:

bs.net@gmx.de changed:

          What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
        AssignedTo|web-apps@gentoo.org         |bug-wranglers@gentoo.org


Never mind.

------- Comment #9 From tuXXer 2005-06-01 04:06:59 0000 -------
Indeed weird...

There isn't a possiblity to change the "Assigned To" field on my account. Maybe
the status would be resetted, when somebody replies to an entry with a different
"Assignment To" value???

Bug List: (This bug is not in your last search results)   Show last search results      Search page      Enter new bug