93177 – mail-mta/postfix: g/fbsd and openpam compatibility

Bug 93177 - mail-mta/postfix: g/fbsd and openpam compatibility

Summary: mail-mta/postfix: g/fbsd and openpam compatibility

Status:	RESOLVED FIXED

Alias:	None

Product:	Gentoo/Alt
Classification:	Unclassified
Component:	Other (show other bugs)
Hardware:	All All

Importance:	High normal (vote)
Assignee:	Tuan Van (RETIRED)

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends on:	93118
Blocks:	93119
	Show dependency tree

Reported:	2005-05-19 03:44 UTC by Diego Elio Pettenò (RETIRED)
Modified:	2006-04-12 10:50 UTC (History)
CC List:	2 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required:	---

Attachments
Ebuild patch (postfix.patch,2.12 KB, patch) 2005-05-19 03:45 UTC, Diego Elio Pettenò (RETIRED)	Details \| Diff
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Description Diego Elio Pettenò (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2005-05-19 03:44:45 UTC

Currently pamd file for postfix is incompatible with openpam, as it uses pam_stack module which is unportable.
The attached patch applied over current ebuild uses the pam eclass (not in tree for now, see bug #93118) which creates the pamd file on the fly using include directive which works fine on openpam and sys-libs/pam-0.78.

I've also added dependency over virtual/pam if pam useflag is enabled.

Misc fixes: removed || die "epatch failed" on epatch, fixed sed syntax to be compatible with non-gnu seds (and gnu sed, too).

Thanks, Diego

Comment 1 Diego Elio Pettenò (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2005-05-19 03:45:08 UTC

Created attachment 59282 [details, diff]
Ebuild patch

Comment 2 Fernando J. Pereda (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2005-05-20 09:24:42 UTC

Fixed in CVS. Though postfix-2.2.3-r1 (the one with these fixes) is p.masked
until mailer.eclass goes testing.

Thanks
Ferdy