92868 – Allow dev-dotnet/gecko-sharp to be built against www-client/mozilla-firefox

Bug 92868 - Allow dev-dotnet/gecko-sharp to be built against www-client/mozilla-firefox

Summary: Allow dev-dotnet/gecko-sharp to be built against www-client/mozilla-firefox

Status:	RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 98839

Alias:	None

Product:	Gentoo Linux
Classification:	Unclassified
Component:	Current packages (show other bugs)
Hardware:	x86 Linux

Importance:	High enhancement (vote)
Assignee:	dotnet project

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends on:
Blocks:

Reported:	2005-05-16 23:43 UTC by Sebastian Bergmann (RETIRED)
Modified:	2005-08-31 19:25 UTC (History)
CC List:	5 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required:	---

Attachments
DEPENDency patch (diff.txt,442 bytes, patch) 2005-05-16 23:44 UTC, Sebastian Bergmann (RETIRED)	Details \| Diff
DEPENDency patch (gecko-sharp-0.10.ebuild_firefox_patch.txt,584 bytes, patch) 2005-07-15 06:49 UTC, Sebastian Bergmann (RETIRED)	Details \| Diff
Show Obsolete (1) View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Description Sebastian Bergmann (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2005-05-16 23:43:32 UTC

As of www-client/mozilla-firefox-1.0.2-r1 packages that depend on gecko can be
built against www-client/mozilla-firefox in addition to www-client/mozilla. An
example for this is www-client/epiphany.

I copied the DEPENDency on www-client/mozilla-firefox or
www-client/mozilla-firefox from the www-client/epiphany-1.6.3 ebuild to the
dev-dotnet/gecko-sharp-0.6 ebuild and gecko-sharp built fine.

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Comment 1 Sebastian Bergmann (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2005-05-16 23:44:30 UTC

Created attachment 59095 [details, diff]
DEPENDency patch

Comment 2 Sebastian Bergmann (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2005-07-15 06:49:35 UTC

Created attachment 63470 [details, diff]
DEPENDency patch

Updated to use the new firefox USE flag that is already used by epiphany and
yelp, for instance, for the same purpose.

Comment 3 Fabian Zeindl 2005-08-30 02:40:50 UTC

This is a duplicate of #98839

Comment 4 Peter Johanson (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2005-08-31 19:25:52 UTC

I agree with fabian on this one. Marking this a dup. There's several patches (of
questionable value, which i'll address there) on that bug. Marking a dup, please
follow that bug for tracking this issue. Thanks.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 98839 ***