Graphviz-2.2.1 is now the stable release from: http://www.graphviz.org/ 2.2.1 is primarily to fix up the CPL header text in some source files that I'd missed before. This fix means that RMS is now willing to list Graphviz in the Free Software Directory. 2.2.1 also contains a number of bug fixes: 183, 247, 419, 615, 616, 625, 626, 627, 643, 646, 651, 658, 661, 664, 674 as described on: http://www.graphviz.org/bugs/buglist.html Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3.
Created attachment 59175 [details] graphviz-2.2.1.ebuild Please test this on all archs. It has been tested on x86 and ppc.
Committed a revbump, I'll have a look at the new ebuild now, thanks for the update
question: 1- X support is available even if tcltk isn't turn on? Osx team could you please have a look at the ebuild and fix if necessary?
I am not sure, as the X option seems to be independent of tcl/tk though, so I would assume as such.
FYI. X is also used by lefty (and dotty and lneato)
That I was unaware of. Thank you John. Luca, yes, the X suppose is available without tcl/tk (according to configure.ac).
Created attachment 59485 [details] graphviz-2.2.1.ebuild Added support for the cairo useflag as well as dynagraph (the later hasnt been tested yet). Test and comment please :-)
Emerges just fine on ppc-macos, and creates dylibs as it should. They are all versioned 0.0.0 though. Is this the correct behavior? I'd tend to think not, but I don't have my linux box to test it on right now. Secondly, how exactly should I test this package. I am unfamiliar with it personally. Thanks
Verified with JoseJX that linux has the same versioning on their .so's. I played with lefty and dotty a bit. Without knowing anything about them, it seems like they work. If someone can give me a more definitive way to test, that'd be great. Otherwise, I'm comfortable that it's fine.
Playing around with it a bit is pretty much the best way to test it imo. If someone else thinks there is a better way, please let me know.
committed, thanks everybody
