Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 85337 - View source broken in epiphany-1.6.0
Summary: View source broken in epiphany-1.6.0
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: [OLD] GNOME (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High normal (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo Linux Gnome Desktop Team
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks: 84701
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2005-03-15 06:00 UTC by Erik Grinaker
Modified: 2005-03-15 13:41 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments
Patch from GNOME bugzilla (epiphany-1.6.0-view_source_fix.patch,10.95 KB, patch)
2005-03-15 06:02 UTC, Erik Grinaker
Details | Diff
Patch from epiphany cvs (epiphany-1.6.0-view_source_fix.patch,10.92 KB, patch)
2005-03-15 08:08 UTC, Erik Grinaker
Details | Diff

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Erik Grinaker 2005-03-15 06:00:07 UTC
View source doesn't work in epiphany 1.6.0 - the application registered for the text/html MIME type is launched, but with a new/empty file, not the page source. See <a href="http://bugs.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=169039">this GNOME bug</a> for details.

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Open any page with epiphany 1.6.0
2. View -> Page Source
Actual Results:  
The source viewer/editor was opened with an empty/new file.

Expected Results:  
The viewer/editor should have opened with the page source code.
Comment 1 Erik Grinaker 2005-03-15 06:02:13 UTC
Created attachment 53518 [details, diff]
Patch from GNOME bugzilla

Here's the patch from the GNOME bugzilla, it works for me. This has been
applied to epiphany cvs, but I don't know when to expect a new release.
Comment 2 foser (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-03-15 07:18:01 UTC
is this the same code that went into CVS ?

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 84701 ***
Comment 3 foser (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-03-15 07:18:26 UTC
yay wasn't thinking
Comment 4 Erik Grinaker 2005-03-15 08:08:38 UTC
Created attachment 53539 [details, diff]
Patch from epiphany cvs

No, it was a patch from bugzilla, which apparently doesn't match what was
committed to epiphany cvs. Here is the patch from cvs (on the gnome 2.10
branch).
Comment 5 Joe McCann (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-03-15 13:41:43 UTC
Added to cvs, thank you much for tracking it.