First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 78720
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Gentoo Toolchain Maintainers <toolchain@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Joerg Plate <plate@patterner.de>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
kde.eclass-visibility.patch Patch against kde.eclass to allow compilation of kde-3.4.0_beta1 on amd64 for the time being. patch Danny van Dyk (RETIRED) 2005-01-27 14:40 0000 912 bytes Details | Diff
kde-3.4.0_beta-acinclude-visibility.patch Patch against acinclude.m4 to possibly go upstream patch Danny van Dyk (RETIRED) 2005-01-27 14:42 0000 681 bytes Details | Diff
kde.eclass.diff Corrected patch to kde.eclass to disable VISIBILITY_HIDDEN on amd64 for all kde ebuilds patch Dan Armak (RETIRED) 2005-01-29 01:42 0000 759 bytes Details | Diff
gcc-3.4.3-patches-1.2.tar.bz2 Patch tarball. application/x-bzip Simon Strandman 2005-03-14 08:01 0000 95.11 KB Details
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 78720 depends on: Show dependency tree
Bug 78720 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug


Description:   Opened: 2005-01-19 13:29 0000
gcc was compiled with -fPIC.

~amd64 was added

kde-base/arts-3.4.0_beta1  +alsa +arts +artswrappersuid -debug +esd -hardened +jack +mad +oggvorbis -xinerama


Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. emerge kde

Actual Results:  
/bin/sh ../libtool --silent --mode=link --tag=CXX x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-g++ 
-Wnon-virtual-dtor -Wno-long-long -Wundef -ansi -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=500-D_BSD_SOURCE
-Wcast-align -Wconversion -Wchar-subscripts -Wall -W -Wpointer-arith
-Wwrite-strings -DNDEBUG -DNO_DEBUG -O2 -O2 -march=athlon64-pipe -fPIC
-Wformat-security -Wmissing-format-attribute -fno-exceptions -fno-check-new
-fno-common -fno-exceptions -fno-check-new -fno-common-fvisibility=hidden
-fvisibility-inlines-hidden  -ftemplate-depth-99    -o libmcop.la -rpath
/usr/kde/3.4/lib64 -no-undefined -Wl,--no-undefined -Wl,--allow-shlib-undefined
-version-info 1:0 -L/usr/lib64   -L/usr/kde/3.4/lib64 -L/usr/qt/3/lib64
-L/usr/lib64 -Wl,--as-needed -Wl,--enable-new-dtags  buffer.lo connection.lo
core.lo debug.lo dispatcher.lo iomanager.lo object.lo socketconnection.lo
tcpconnection.lo unixconnection.lo tcpserver.lo unixserver.lo objectmanager.lo
factory.lo idlfilereg.lo ifacerepo_impl.lo mcoputils.lo startupmanager.lo md5.lo
md5auth.lo referenceclean.lo datapacket.lo asyncstream.lo notification.lo
flowsystem.lo extensionloader.lo tmpglobalcomm.lo mcopconfig.lo connect.lo
reference.lo type.lo trader_impl.lo dynamicrequest.lo anyref.lo loopback.lo
delayedreturn.lo thread.lo dynamicskeleton.lo  -lgmodule-2.0 -ldl -lgthread-2.0
-lglib-2.0   ../libltdl/libltdlc.la
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/3.4.3/../../../../x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld:
.libs/core.o: relocation R_X86_64_PC32 against `std::basic_string<char,
std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::~basic_string()@@GLIBCXX_3.4'
can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/3.4.3/../../../../x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld:
final link failed: Bad value
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[3]: *** [libmcop.la] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/arts-3.4.0_beta1/work/arts-1.3.91/mcop'
make[2]: *** [all] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/arts-3.4.0_beta1/work/arts-1.3.91/mcop'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/arts-3.4.0_beta1/work/arts-1.3.91'
make: *** [all] Error 2

!!! ERROR: kde-base/arts-3.4.0_beta1 failed.
!!! Function kde_src_compile, Line 142, Exitcode 2
!!! died running emake, kde_src_compile:make



Portage 2.0.51-r14 (default-linux/amd64/2005.0, gcc-3.4.3,
glibc-2.3.4.20041102-r0, 2.6.10-ck4 x86_64)
=================================================================
System uname: 2.6.10-ck4 x86_64 AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 4000+
Gentoo Base System version 1.6.8
Python:              dev-lang/python-2.3.4,dev-lang/python-2.4 [2.4 (#1, Dec 21
2004, 21:22:23)]
ccache version 2.3 [enabled]
dev-lang/python:     2.3.4, 2.4
sys-devel/autoconf:  2.59-r6, 2.13
sys-devel/automake:  1.5, 1.8.5-r2, 1.6.3, 1.4_p6, 1.7.9, 1.9.4
sys-devel/binutils:  2.15.92.0.2-r2, 2.15.92.0.2-r1
sys-devel/libtool:   1.5.10-r2
virtual/os-headers:  2.6.8.1-r3
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="amd64 ~amd64"
AUTOCLEAN="yes"
CFLAGS="-O2 -march=athlon64 -pipe -fPIC"
CHOST="x86_64-pc-linux-gnu"
CONFIG_PROTECT="/etc /opt/openjms/config /usr/kde/2/share/config
/usr/kde/3.3/env /usr/kde/3.3/share/config /usr/kde/3.3/shutdown
/usr/kde/3/share/config /usr/lib/X11/xkb /usr/lib/mozilla/defaults/pref
/usr/share/config /var/qmail/control"
CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK="/etc/gconf /etc/terminfo /etc/texmf/web2c /etc/env.d"
CXXFLAGS="-O2 -march=athlon64 -pipe -fPIC"
DISTDIR="/usr/portage/distfiles"
FEATURES="autoaddcvs autoconfig buildpkg candy ccache distlocks moo sandbox"
GENTOO_MIRRORS="ftp://cs.ubishops.ca/pub/gentoo
ftp://sunsite.ualberta.ca/pub/unix/Linux/gentoo/ ftp://gentoo.risq.qc.ca/
ftp://ftp.ucsb.edu/pub/mirrors/linux/gentoo/ http://mirror.tucdemonic.org/gentoo/"
MAKEOPTS="-j2"
PKGDIR="/usr/portage/packages"
PORTAGE_TMPDIR="/var/tmp"
PORTDIR="/usr/portage"
SYNC="rsync://rsync.gentoo.org/gentoo-portage"

------- Comment #1 From Andrew Nelson 2005-01-19 21:38:40 0000 -------
You are not alone.

------- Comment #2 From Simone Gotti (RETIRED) 2005-01-20 00:11:24 0000 -------
If I'm not wrong I can understand that this problem is amd64 only. So I'll CC
the amd64 herd, and feel free to reassign the bug to you.

There's also a similare bug: #62419.

------- Comment #3 From Andrew Nelson 2005-01-23 00:46:54 0000 -------
i reported this bug on kde's bugzilla

------- Comment #4 From Caleb Tennis 2005-01-23 05:30:06 0000 -------
This isn't an upstream issue, it's a local compilation issue.  I doubt the KDE
developers are going to be able to help.

------- Comment #5 From Jure Repinc 2005-01-24 13:15:48 0000 -------
I have the same problem trying to compile KDE 3.4 from CVS sources.

------- Comment #6 From Andrew Nelson 2005-01-24 23:08:33 0000 -------
Re: #4
you're right, they said it's a compiler error, i'm not sure what patch to gcc would cause it.

------- Comment #7 From Gregorio Guidi (RETIRED) 2005-01-27 05:41:53 0000 -------
*** Bug 79690 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #8 From Gregorio Guidi (RETIRED) 2005-01-27 05:45:14 0000 -------
toolchain herd: reassigning to you since we are seeing more and more of these 
errors or similar ones, can you see if there's something wrong with our 
libstdc++/binutils setup?

Joseph: please post your 'emerge info'

------- Comment #9 From Alexander Gabert (RETIRED) 2005-01-27 10:01:42 0000 -------
Kugelfang and i are looking at this one at the moment, stay tuned.

------- Comment #10 From Danny van Dyk (RETIRED) 2005-01-27 11:21:32 0000 -------
*** Bug 79711 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #11 From Danny van Dyk (RETIRED) 2005-01-27 13:09:48 0000 -------
Consensus seems to be to remove -fvisibilit=hidden and
-fvisibility-inlines-hidden
with a specifically taylored gcc SPECS file.

For this, see also "GCC-3.4, -fvisibility* and KDE/QT on amd64", mail on
gentoo-dev mailing list.

------- Comment #12 From Gregorio Guidi (RETIRED) 2005-01-27 13:23:50 0000 -------
*** Bug 77592 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #13 From Gregorio Guidi (RETIRED) 2005-01-27 13:25:41 0000 -------
note that for bug 77592 the error is a bit different:
"relocation R_X86_64_32 against `a local symbol' can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC"

------- Comment #14 From Alexander Gabert (RETIRED) 2005-01-27 14:14:13 0000 -------
Issue is mentioned upstream:

http://groups.google.de/groups?q=relocation+R_X86_64_PC32+against+making+a+shared+object&hl=de&lr=&selm=ct12kj%242njo%241%40FreeBSD.csie.NCTU.edu.tw&rnum=2


------- Comment #15 From Alexander Gabert (RETIRED) 2005-01-27 14:20:55 0000 -------
http://dev.gentoo.org/~pappy/arts-vs-gcc-visibility/gentoo_toolchain.log

our progress so far, thanks for the teams for working on this together.

-Alex

------- Comment #16 From Alexander Gabert (RETIRED) 2005-01-27 14:35:59 0000 -------
Internal Problem Report regarding RELOCATION errors with PIC generated code:

Any given CXXFLAGS containing -fvisibility-inlines-hidden and -fvisibility="hidden" being used by libtool to construct object files (ending with the extension .o) for building a statically linked shared library (ending with .a) and being also used for constructing this same object code with -fPIC leads to the linker emitting hard to understand errors about false relocations in the object files that are demonstrable and evidently created as -fPIC object code.

This is due to a yet to be investigated strange and unwanted gcc behaviour.
 
(this can be proven by adding -v to the CXXFLAGS of libtool) 

Danny worked out a solution to filter -fvisibility-inlines-hidden from all respective CXXFLAGS that are instrumented for generating such object code and can give a positive feedback and will trigger a wide range of testing plus notification of the appropriate upstream contacts about this issue.

This is an issue of gcc generating incorrect object code that the linker cannot subsequently process into transforming this "malformed" object code into the contents a shared library. 


Thank you to the AMD team for your fast problem solution skills and help regarding this "deeper" problem in the gcc-3.4 toolchain.

Danny is currently working on a solution regarding kde.eclass filtering this evil compiler flag out of possibly infected kde ebuilds.

Thanks again for the good supprt and have fun with the (now a little more less broken) toolchain,


Alex

References: http://people.redhat.com/drepper/dsohowto.pdf

------- Comment #17 From Danny van Dyk (RETIRED) 2005-01-27 14:40:14 0000 -------
Created an attachment (id=49689) [details]
Patch against kde.eclass to allow compilation of kde-3.4.0_beta1 on amd64 for
the time being.

This patch allows to build arts-3.4.0_beta1 and packagtes with similar
problems.
It removes the offending -fvisible-inlines-hidden flag from CXXFLAGS w/o
touching
the desired -fvisible=hidden.

------- Comment #18 From Danny van Dyk (RETIRED) 2005-01-27 14:42:43 0000 -------
Created an attachment (id=49691) [details]
Patch against acinclude.m4 to possibly go upstream

KDE-herd: Please review attached patch. The upstream KDE devs might want to
include it until this gcc-{3.4,4.0} BUG vanishes.

------- Comment #19 From Andreas Pokorny 2005-01-27 16:45:23 0000 -------
Paolo Carlini from suse could confirm the problem for amd64, but neither on x86
nor on ia64. 
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2005-01/msg00302.html

------- Comment #20 From Andreas Pokorny 2005-01-27 22:46:33 0000 -------
Finally wrote a minimum failing example, it seems that the extern-template
feature of gcc makes gcc break, see the bug report at gcc.gnu.org:

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19664

------- Comment #21 From Heinrich Wendel (RETIRED) 2005-01-28 05:05:34 0000 -------
It may be related to this change in binutils: 
 
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-alpha/2004-12/msg00062.html 
 
Changes from binutils 2.15.91.0.1: 
2. Fix the x86_64 linker to prevent non-PIC code in shared library.

------- Comment #22 From Dan Armak (RETIRED) 2005-01-29 01:40:59 0000 -------
The patch to kde.eclass can't be used as-is. If make -f admin/Makefile.common
is triggered for whatever reason, changes to configure.in will be lost.
We should rather modify all configure.in.in files in src_unpack. I'll attach a
patch doing that.

Other than that I'm OK with applying this. Anyone else? (I don't have an AMD64
to play with; I'm just commenting on the patch to kde.eclass.)

------- Comment #23 From Dan Armak (RETIRED) 2005-01-29 01:42:17 0000 -------
Created an attachment (id=49805) [details]
Corrected patch to kde.eclass to disable VISIBILITY_HIDDEN on amd64 for all kde
ebuilds

------- Comment #24 From Andreas Pokorny 2005-01-29 03:12:38 0000 -------
Are you talking about the acinclude.m4 patch, which avoids setting the
-fvisiblity-inlines-hidden compiler flags, but which allows the HAVE_VISIBILITY
to pass?

In my opinion that feature should not be disabled in general. As you can read
in the gcc bug report, the binutils do their job good, it is just gcc that
defines bad symbols when the extern template feature is used, from what i know
this is only used in the libstdc++-library. 

I would rather suggest to only remove the part that makes all inlines hidden no
matter what general visibility is choseen. Kugelfangs patch worked fine here. 

------- Comment #25 From Dan Armak (RETIRED) 2005-01-29 03:32:47 0000 -------
You're right, the acinclude.m4 patch is better if it suffices. Since the
visibility thing is only used in KDE 3.4, which is masked, we can introduce
this patch globally without much testing first.

kugelfang: why did you make two patches, with the kde.eclass one removing
all visibility functionality and the acinclude.m4 one removing only the
problematic inlines flag? We can apply the acinclude.m4 patch globally if
needed.

amd64 people: OK to commit the patch to acinclude.m4 for all kde 3.4b1 ebuilds?
AFAIK noone on the kde team has an amd64 box to test on.

------- Comment #26 From Danny van Dyk (RETIRED) 2005-01-29 04:06:40 0000 -------
Sorry, i forgot to mark my first patch as obsolete ;-)

Can we patch acinclude.m4 from within kde.eclass, or will we have to
patch all ebuilds manually ?

------- Comment #27 From Dan Armak (RETIRED) 2005-01-29 05:43:36 0000 -------
I've applied your patch to acinclude.m4.in from kde_src_unpack and committed
the eclass. This should only affect kde 3.4 ebuilds on amd64.

This is kde.eclass rev 1.110. I used a sed because a patch would have to
go into all the digests.

------- Comment #28 From Gregorio Guidi (RETIRED) 2005-01-29 06:22:38 0000 -------
From the gcc bug (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19664),
which was closed as INVALID:

>> It is a compiler bug. VisTest<char>::VisTest() is never defined.
>> R_X86_64_PC32 relocation may not reach it at runtime when it is
>> called. The new linker catches this particular bug at linktime.
>
> Actually this is not a gcc or a linker bug but a programmers.
> Basically -fvisibility=hidden -fvisibility-inlines-hidden says all I repeat > all functions (defined or not) as hidden.

What does this mean for us, can anyone explain?

------- Comment #29 From Simone Gotti (RETIRED) 2005-01-29 06:34:16 0000 -------
Gregorio: I cannot understand well that comment. It says that that flags make
all the functions hidded, but this is normal as the kde developers exports only
the externally needed functions (like is always done in ms windows.). 
Probably it's saying that something on the kde side isn't correctly exported?
dunno. 

------- Comment #30 From Heinrich Wendel (RETIRED) 2005-01-29 13:06:54 0000 -------
the comment you quoted is wrong, they found the bug in the libstdc++ headers

------- Comment #31 From Carsten Lohrke 2005-01-30 03:12:55 0000 -------
*** Bug 80034 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #32 From Esben Mose Hansen 2005-02-24 01:45:38 0000 -------
Shouldn't sys-devel/binutils-2.15.92.0.2-r1 be marked as ~amd64?

------- Comment #33 From Danny van Dyk (RETIRED) 2005-03-02 05:53:20 0000 -------
Removing pappy@g.o from CC: He has resigned as a Gentoo Developer.

@Mike: According to LukeJr, the -fivisibility-* options are part of a backported
patch and this BUG can by fixed by excluding these patches:

13_all_gcc34-visibility1.patch.bz2 
14_all_gcc34-visibility2.patch.bz2
15_all_gcc34-visibility3.patch.bz2

Can we take them out and put 'em back in when upstream fixes it ?

------- Comment #34 From Simon Strandman 2005-03-03 03:53:17 0000 -------
Mandrakelinux 10.2 Beta1 for x86_64 was relased today. It contains a gcc 3.4
with backported symbol visibility patches, just like gentoo, and KDE is
compiled with -fvisibility=hidden and -fvisibility-inlines-hidden according to
the release notes. I wonder how they have managed to work around this problem!

http://www.mandrakelinux.com/en/102beta-x86-64.php3

------- Comment #35 From Andreas Pokorny 2005-03-04 00:17:20 0000 -------
I guess they use an older, and less correct binutils packages. So this
libstdc++ and gcc bug will not show up.

Should we patch again, combinging the final result of [1], the patch at [2] and
a patched libstdc++?

[1] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20218
[2] http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-02/msg01835.html

Are there other packages than kde, that use -fvisibility?

------- Comment #36 From Gregorio Guidi (RETIRED) 2005-03-08 01:53:40 0000 -------
*** Bug 84460 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #37 From Simon Strandman 2005-03-14 07:58:49 0000 -------
Acctually mandrake uses the same version of binutils that gentoo so I decided
to investigate this a bit further. It seems that something is wrong with
gentoo's symbol visibility patches. I replaced the patches with those from
Mandrake and the problem disappeared. Now KDE 3.4-rc1 and 3.3 compiles without
problems with -fvisibility-inlines-hidden on my amd64. I'm going to attatch an
updated patch tarball with the mandrake patches.

Portage 2.0.51.19 (default-linux/amd64/2004.3, gcc-3.4.3,
glibc-2.3.4.20050125-r0, 2.6.11-ck2 x86_64)
=================================================================
System uname: 2.6.11-ck2 x86_64 AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3500+
Gentoo Base System version 1.4.16
Python:              dev-lang/python-2.3.4-r1 [2.3.4 (#1, Feb 20 2005,
21:53:44)]
dev-lang/python:     2.3.4-r1
sys-devel/autoconf:  2.59-r6, 2.13
sys-devel/automake:  1.7.9-r1, 1.8.5-r3, 1.5, 1.4_p6, 1.6.3, 1.9.4
sys-devel/binutils:  2.15.94.0.2.2
sys-devel/libtool:   1.5.10-r4
virtual/os-headers:  2.6.8.1-r3
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="amd64"
AUTOCLEAN="yes"
CFLAGS="-Os -march=athlon64 -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer -fweb"
CHOST="x86_64-pc-linux-gnu"
CONFIG_PROTECT="/etc /usr/kde/2/share/config /usr/kde/3/share/config
/usr/lib/X11/xkb /usr/lib/mozilla/defaults/pref /usr/share/config
/var/qmail/control"
CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK="/etc/gconf /etc/terminfo /etc/env.d"
CXXFLAGS="-Os -march=athlon64 -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer -fweb
-fvisibility-inlines-hidden -fno-enforce-eh-specs"
DISTDIR="/usr/portage/distfiles"
FEATURES="autoaddcvs autoconfig ccache distlocks sandbox"
GENTOO_MIRRORS="http://snigel.no-ip.com/ http://mirror.pudas.net/gentoo
ftp://ftp.rhnet.is/pub/gentoo/ ftp://linux.rz.ruhr-uni-bochum.de/gentoo-mirror/
http://ftp.rhnet.is/pub/gentoo/"
LANG="sv_SE.ISO8859-1"
LC_ALL="sv_SE.ISO8859-1"
LDFLAGS="-Wl,-O1"
MAKEOPTS="-j2"
PKGDIR="/usr/portage/packages"
PORTAGE_TMPDIR="/var/tmp"
PORTDIR="/usr/portage"
PORTDIR_OVERLAY="/usr/local/portage"
SYNC="rsync://rsync.gentoo.org/gentoo-portage"
USE="amd64 X aalib acpi alsa artswrappersuid berkdb caps cdr crypt curl dga dvd
dvdr dvdread eds f77 fam fbcon fortran gcj gif gnome gphoto2 gpm gtk gtk2 hal
imlib ipv6 jack jack-tmpfs java javascript jp2 jpeg kdeenablefinal lzw lzw-tiff
mad mikmod mng motif mozilla mp3 mpeg multilib ncurses nls nptl nptlonly nvidia
objc offensive oggvorbis opengl pam perl pic png pnp python qt quicktime
readline samba ssl svg tcpd tiff truetype truetype-fonts type1-fonts unicode
usb userlocales vidix xine xml xml2 xmms xpm xrandr xv xvid zlib
video_cards_nvidia linguas_sv"
Unset:  ASFLAGS, CBUILD, CTARGET

------- Comment #38 From Simon Strandman 2005-03-14 08:01:57 0000 -------
Created an attachment (id=53432) [details]
Patch tarball.

This is the updated patch tarball with the mandrake patches. I bumped the
version to 1.2. I can't reproduce the bug with this.

------- Comment #39 From SpanKY 2005-03-14 08:06:46 0000 -------
gcc patch tarball ?

which gcc version ?

------- Comment #40 From Simon Strandman 2005-03-14 08:12:59 0000 -------
Sorry. I'm using the latest stable, gcc 3.4.3-r1.

------- Comment #41 From SpanKY 2005-03-14 08:15:46 0000 -------
ok, i'll see about a 3.4.3-r2 then

------- Comment #42 From SpanKY 2005-03-14 08:55:54 0000 -------
*** Bug 85144 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #43 From SpanKY 2005-03-18 19:37:39 0000 -------
ok, danny and i both verified this works nicely, thanks Simon :)

i'm going to add gcc-3.4.3.20050110-r1 with these fixes once i verify a few other patches work sanely ... should happen tomorrow or sunday at the latest

------- Comment #44 From SpanKY 2005-03-20 12:32:06 0000 -------
gcc-3.4.3.20050110-r1 now in portage, thanks all !

------- Comment #45 From Blu3 2005-03-22 23:11:46 0000 -------
Hmm, am I missing something?

gcc -shared -Wl,-soname -Wl,libnspr4.so -o libnspr4.so ./prvrsion.o io/./prfdcach.o io/./prmwait.o io/./prmapopt.o io/./priometh.o io/./pripv6.o io/./prlayer.o io/./prlog.o io/./prmmap.o io/./prpolevt.o io/./prprf.o io/./prscanf.o io/./prstdio.o threads/./prcmon.o threads/./prrwlock.o threads/./prtpd.o linking/./prlink.o malloc/./prmem.o md/./prosdep.o memory/./prshm.o memory/./prshma.o memory/./prseg.o misc/./pralarm.o misc/./pratom.o misc/./prcountr.o misc/./prdtoa.o misc/./prenv.o misc/./prerr.o misc/./prerror.o misc/./prerrortable.o misc/./prinit.o misc/./prinrval.o misc/./pripc.o misc/./prlog2.o misc/./prlong.o misc/./prnetdb.o misc/./prolock.o misc/./prrng.o misc/./prsystem.o misc/./prthinfo.o misc/./prtpool.o misc/./prtrace.o misc/./prtime.o malloc/./prmalloc.o pthreads/./ptsynch.o pthreads/./ptio.o pthreads/./ptthread.o pthreads/./ptmisc.o md/unix/./unix.o md/unix/./unix_errors.o md/unix/./uxproces.o md/unix/./uxrng.o md/unix/./uxshm.o md/unix/./uxwrap.o md/unix/./linux.o md/unix/./os_Linux_x86_64.o  -lpthread -ldl
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/3.4.3-20050110/../../../../x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld: io/./priometh.o: relocation R_X86_64_PC32 against `memcpy@@GLIBC_2.2.5' can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/3.4.3-20050110/../../../../x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld: final link failed: Bad value
[...]

david@Scott /usr/src/cvs/mozilla $ gcc --version
gcc (GCC) 3.4.3-20050110 (Gentoo Hardened Linux 3.4.3.20050110-r1, ssp-3.4.3.20050110-0, pie-8.7.7)

------- Comment #46 From Yuta SATOH (RETIRED) 2005-03-30 11:01:47 0000 -------
*** Bug 86391 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #47 From Caleb Tennis 2005-04-01 04:45:39 0000 -------
*** Bug 87448 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #48 From Simon Stelling (RETIRED) 2005-04-10 05:13:31 0000 -------
i still run into bug 87448: 

/bin/sh ../libtool --silent --mode=link --tag=CXX x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-g++  -Wnon-virtual-dtor -Wno-long-long -Wundef -ansi -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=500 -D_BSD_SOURCE -Wcast-align -Wconversion -Wchar-subscripts -Wall -W -Wpointer-arith -Wwrite-strings -g3 -fno-inline -g -ggdb -pipe -Wformat-security -Wmissing-format-attribute -fno-exceptions -fno-check-new -fno-common -fno-exceptions -fno-check-new -fno-common -fvisibility=hidden  -DQT_CLEAN_NAMESPACE -DQT_NO_ASCII_CAST -DQT_NO_STL -DQT_NO_COMPAT -DQT_NO_TRANSLATION     -o libkdecore.la -rpath /usr/kde/3.4/lib -L/usr/qt/3/lib -R /usr/kde/3.4/lib -R /usr/kde/3.4/lib -R /usr/qt/3/lib -R /usr/lib64  -L/usr/lib64  -version-info 6:0:2 -no-undefined -Wl,--no-undefined -Wl,--allow-shlib-undefined libintl.lo kapplication.lo kdebug.lo netwm.lo kconfigbase.lo kconfig.lo ksimpleconfig.lo kconfigbackend.lo kmanagerselection.lo kdesktopfile.lo kstandarddirs.lo ksock.lo kpty.lo kprocess.lo kprocctrl.lo klocale.lo krfcdate.lo kiconeffect.lo kicontheme.lo kiconloader.lo kwin.lo kwinmodule.lo krootprop.lo kcharsets.lo kckey.lo kshortcut.lo kkeynative_x11.lo kkeyserver_x11.lo kaccelaction.lo kshortcutmenu.lo kaccelbase.lo kaccel.lo kglobalaccel_x11.lo kglobalaccel.lo kstdaccel.lo kshortcutlist.lo kcrash.lo kurl.lo kregexp.lo kglobal.lo kglobalsettings.lo kallocator.lo kvmallocator.lo kmimesourcefactory.lo kinstance.lo kpalette.lo kipc.lo klibloader.lo ktempfile.lo kuniqueapplication.lo kaccelmanager.lo ksavefile.lo krandomsequence.lo kstringhandler.lo kcompletion.lo kcmdlineargs.lo kaboutdata.lo kcompletionbase.lo knotifyclient.lo kaudioplayer.lo kdcoppropertyproxy.lo ksockaddr.lo kextsock.lo netsupp.lo kprocio.lo kbufferedio.lo kpixmapprovider.lo kurldrag.lo kmdcodec.lo ksocks.lo fakes.lo vsnprintf.lo ksycoca.lo ksycocadict.lo ksycocafactory.lo kxmessages.lo kstartupinfo.lo kcatalogue.lo kasyncio.lo kmultipledrag.lo kstaticdeleter.lo kappdcopiface.lo kclipboard.lo kcheckaccelerators.lo kdeversion.lo kdebugdcopiface.lo kcalendarsystem.lo kcalendarsystemgregorian.lo kcalendarsystemhijri.lo kcalendarsystemhebrew.lo kcalendarsystemfactory.lo kmacroexpander.lo kidna.lo ktempdir.lo kshell.lo kmountpoint.lo kcalendarsystemjalali.lo kprotocolinfo_kdecore.lo kprotocolinfofactory.lo kxerrorhandler.lo kuser.lo kconfigskeleton.lo kconfigdialogmanager.lo klockfile.lo ksycoca_skel.lo kappdcopiface_skel.lo kdebugdcopiface_skel.lo malloc/libklmalloc.la network/libkdecorenetwork.la svgicons/libkdesvgicons.la ../dcop/libDCOP.la ../libltdl/libltdlc.la -lXext -lresolv -lutil -L/usr/lib -lart_lgpl_2 -lm -lidn ../kdefx/libkdefx.la
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/3.4.3-20050110/../../../../x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld: .libs/kglobal.o: relocation R_X86_64_PC32 against `KGlobal::_locale' can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/3.4.3-20050110/../../../../x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld: final link failed: Bad value
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[4]: *** [libkdecore.la] Error 1
make[4]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/kdelibs-3.4.0/work/kdelibs-3.4.0/kdecore'
make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/kdelibs-3.4.0/work/kdelibs-3.4.0/kdecore'
make[2]: *** [all] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/kdelibs-3.4.0/work/kdelibs-3.4.0/kdecore'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/kdelibs-3.4.0/work/kdelibs-3.4.0'
make: *** [all] Error 2

!!! ERROR: kde-base/kdelibs-3.4.0 failed.
!!! Function kde_src_compile, Line 166, Exitcode 2
!!! died running emake, kde_src_compile:make

Portage 2.0.51.19 (default-linux/amd64/2004.3, gcc-3.4.3-20050110, glibc-2.3.4.20050125-r1, 2.6.9-gentoo-r14 x86_64)
=================================================================
System uname: 2.6.9-gentoo-r14 x86_64 AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 242
Gentoo Base System version 1.6.10
Python:              dev-lang/python-2.3.5 [2.3.5 (#1, Feb 23 2005, 21:43:38)]
dev-lang/python:     2.3.5
sys-devel/autoconf:  2.13, 2.59-r6
sys-devel/automake:  1.5, 1.8.5-r3, 1.7.9-r1, 1.6.3, 1.4_p6, 1.9.5
sys-devel/binutils:  2.15.92.0.2-r7
sys-devel/libtool:   1.5.14
virtual/os-headers:  2.6.8.1-r4
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="amd64 ~amd64"
AUTOCLEAN="yes"
CFLAGS="-g -ggdb -pipe"
CHOST="x86_64-pc-linux-gnu"
CONFIG_PROTECT="/etc /usr/kde/2/share/config /usr/kde/3/share/config /usr/lib/X11/xkb /usr/lib/mozilla/defaults/pref /usr/share/config /var/qmail/alias /var/qmail/control"
CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK="/etc/gconf /etc/terminfo /etc/env.d"
CXXFLAGS="-g -ggdb -pipe"
DISTDIR="/usr/portage/distfiles"
FEATURES="autoaddcvs autoconfig buildpkg ccache cvs debug distlocks multilib-strict sandbox"
GENTOO_MIRRORS="http://distfiles.gentoo.org http://distro.ibiblio.org/pub/Linux/distributions/gentoo"
MAKEOPTS="-j2"
PKGDIR="/usr/portage/packages"
PORTAGE_TMPDIR="/var/tmp"
PORTDIR="/usr/portage"
SYNC="rsync://buggy"
USE="amd64 X acpi alsa berkdb bitmap-fonts cdr crypt curl debug dvd esd fam flac font-server fortran gdbm gif gnome gpm gstreamer gtk gtk2 imagemagick imlib ipv6 java jp2 jpeg lzw lzw-tiff mad motif mozilla mp3 mpeg mysql ncurses network nls nptl ogg oggvorbis opengl oss pam perl png python qt readline ruby sdl ssl svg tcltk tcpd tiff truetype truetype-fonts type1-fonts usb userlocales utf8 vorbis xml xml2 xpm xrandr xv zlib"
Unset:  ASFLAGS, CBUILD, CTARGET, LANG, LC_ALL, LDFLAGS, PORTDIR_OVERLAY

------- Comment #49 From SpanKY 2005-04-10 13:30:18 0000 -------
what version of gcc are you using

------- Comment #50 From Gregorio Guidi (RETIRED) 2005-04-12 14:59:14 0000 -------
*** Bug 88892 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #51 From Gregorio Guidi (RETIRED) 2005-04-17 09:59:36 0000 -------
*** Bug 89425 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #52 From Jakub Moc (RETIRED) 2005-05-12 19:20:32 0000 -------
*** Bug 92460 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #53 From Gregorio Guidi (RETIRED) 2005-05-25 07:23:52 0000 -------
*** Bug 93653 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #54 From SpanKY 2005-05-25 17:20:08 0000 -------
this is fixed

------- Comment #55 From Gregorio Guidi (RETIRED) 2005-06-06 07:06:36 0000 -------
*** Bug 95218 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #56 From Jakub Moc (RETIRED) 2005-08-15 12:57:24 0000 -------
*** Bug 102642 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #57 From Gregorio Guidi (RETIRED) 2005-08-27 07:47:39 0000 -------
*** Bug 103915 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #58 From Christophe Saout 2005-09-13 05:55:39 0000 -------
I've seen this too, with gcc 4.0. I just assumed this was the fault of gcc 4,
but now I see this is a general problem. Anyway, I've seen this with subversion
too, for example (I don't currently remember the other one):

cd subversion/bindings/java/javahl/native && /bin/sh
/var/tmp/portage/subversion-1.2.3-r1/work/subversion-1.2.3/libtool --tag=CXX
--silent --mode=link x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-g++  -O2 -march=athlon64 -pipe
-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=1 -DLINUX=2 -D_REENTRANT -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=500 -D_BSD_SOURCE
-D_SVID_SOURCE -D_GNU_SOURCE   -pthread -DNEON_ZLIB -DNEON_SSL  -L/usr/lib64 
-lstdc++ -rpath /usr/lib64 -o libsvnjavahl-1.la  BlameCallback.lo
CommitMessage.lo EnumMapper.lo Inputer.lo JNIByteArray.lo JNICriticalSection.lo
JNIMutex.lo JNIStackElement.lo JNIStringHolder.lo JNIThreadData.lo JNIUtil.lo
MessageReceiver.lo Notify.lo Notify2.lo Outputer.lo Path.lo Pool.lo Prompter.lo
Revision.lo SVNAdmin.lo SVNBase.lo SVNClient.lo Targets.lo libsvnjavahl.la.lo
org_tigris_subversion_javahl_SVNAdmin.lo
org_tigris_subversion_javahl_SVNClient.lo
../../../../../subversion/libsvn_repos/libsvn_repos-1.la
../../../../../subversion/libsvn_client/libsvn_client-1.la
../../../../../subversion/libsvn_wc/libsvn_wc-1.la
../../../../../subversion/libsvn_ra/libsvn_ra-1.la
../../../../../subversion/libsvn_delta/libsvn_delta-1.la
../../../../../subversion/libsvn_subr/libsvn_subr-1.la
/usr/lib64/libaprutil-0.la -lldap -llber -lgdbm -ldb-4.3 -lexpat
/usr/lib64/libapr-0.la -lrt -lm -lcrypt -lnsl  -lpthread -ldl -L/usr/lib64
-lneon -lz -lssl -lcrypto -ldl -L/usr/lib64 -Wl,-rpath -Wl,/usr/lib64 -O2
-march=athlon64 -pipe -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=1 -lgssapi_krb5 -lkrb5 -lk5crypto
-lkrb5support -lcom_err -lresolv -lxml2 -lz -lm -lz
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.0.2-beta20050908/../../../../x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld:
warning: creating a DT_TEXTREL in object.
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.0.2-beta20050908/../../../../x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld:
.libs/Path.o: relocation R_X86_64_PC32 against `std::basic_string<char,
std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::basic_string()@@GLIBCXX_3.4' can
not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.0.2-beta20050908/../../../../x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld:
final link failed: Bad value
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make: *** [subversion/bindings/java/javahl/native/libsvnjavahl-1.la] Fehler 1

!!! ERROR: dev-util/subversion-1.2.3-r1 failed.
!!! Function src_compile, Line 128, Exitcode 2

Portage 2.0.52-r1 (default-linux/amd64/2005.1/no-symlinks,
gcc-4.0.2-beta20050908-hardenednopie, glibc-2.3.5.20050725-r0, 2.6.12-rc1-cs2
x86_64)
=================================================================
System uname: 2.6.12-rc1-cs2 x86_64 AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3000+
Gentoo Base System version 1.12.0_pre8
distcc 2.18.3 x86_64-pc-linux-gnu (protocols 1 and 2) (default port 3632) [disabled]
dev-lang/python:     2.4.1-r1
sys-apps/sandbox:    1.2.13
sys-devel/autoconf:  2.13, 2.59-r7
sys-devel/automake:  1.4_p6, 1.5, 1.6.3, 1.7.9-r1, 1.8.5-r3, 1.9.6
sys-devel/binutils:  2.16.91.0.3
sys-devel/libtool:   1.5.20
virtual/os-headers:  2.6.11-r2
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="amd64 ~amd64"
AUTOCLEAN="yes"
CBUILD="x86_64-pc-linux-gnu"
CFLAGS="-O2 -march=athlon64 -pipe -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=1"
CHOST="x86_64-pc-linux-gnu"
CONFIG_PROTECT="/etc /usr/kde/2/share/config /usr/kde/3/share/config
/usr/lib/X11/xkb /usr/share/config /var/bind /var/qmail/alias /var/qmail/control"
CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK="/etc/gconf /etc/terminfo /etc/env.d"
CXXFLAGS="-O2 -march=athlon64 -pipe -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=1 -fvisibility-inlines-hidden"
DISTDIR="/usr/portage/distfiles"
FEATURES="autoconfig distlocks multilib-strict sandbox sfperms strict"
GENTOO_MIRRORS="http://gentoo.inode.at/ ftp://gentoo.inode.at/source/
http://ftp.uni-erlangen.de/pub/mirrors/gentoo
ftp://ftp.uni-erlangen.de/pub/mirrors/gentoo"
LANG="de_DE@euro"
LINGUAS="de en"
MAKEOPTS="-j5"
PKGDIR="/home/system/packages"
PORTAGE_TMPDIR="/var/tmp"
PORTDIR="/usr/portage"
PORTDIR_OVERLAY="/usr/local/portage"
SYNC="rsync://rsync.europe.gentoo.org/gentoo-portage"
USE="X aalib acl acpi alsa amd64 apache2 authdaemond avi berkdb bitmap-fonts
bzip2 cairo caps cdb crypt curl devmap droproot eds emboss encode exif fam
foomaticdb fortran gcj gd gdbm gif gmp gpm gs gstreamer gtk2 guile hardened
iconv idn imagemagick imap imlib ipv6 java jpeg junit kerberos lcms ldap libg++
libgda libwww lzw lzw-tiff maildir mcal motif mp3 mpeg mysql ncurses nfsv4 nls
nptl odbc oggvorbis opengl pam pdf pdflib perl php pic png postgres postscript
python quicktime quotas readline samba sasl sdl slang snmp source spamassassin
spell ssl tcl tcpd tiff truetype truetype-fonts type1-fonts unicode usb
userlocales utf8 webdav xinerama xml xml2 xpm xv zlib linguas_de linguas_en
userland_GNU kernel_linux elibc_glibc"
Unset:  ASFLAGS, CTARGET, LC_ALL, LDFLAGS

------- Comment #59 From Gregorio Guidi (RETIRED) 2005-09-25 10:14:06 0000 -------
*** Bug 107193 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #60 From Jose daLuz 2005-09-25 10:50:23 0000 -------
I just filed bug 107193 which is a duplicate of this one (ksvg-3.5_beta1 and
kgamma-3.5_beta1 were the packages that caused this error).  Having read through
this, I'm not certain what the actual status is since it's marked resolved but
the error is still occurring.

------- Comment #61 From Heinrich Wendel (RETIRED) 2005-09-25 12:53:20 0000 -------
I'm wondering as well. Is it possible to build kde with  
-fvisibility-inlines-hidden now? If, with which gcc version, 3.4 or 4.0? the  
upstream bug seems not to be fixed yet:  
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19664  

------- Comment #62 From SpanKY 2005-09-25 15:18:01 0000 -------
never force visibility flags in your CFLAGS/CXXFLAGS

if you do and things break, it's your fault

------- Comment #63 From Heinrich Wendel (RETIRED) 2005-09-25 22:46:39 0000 -------
I don't talk about force, but kde claims to support it out of the box 

------- Comment #64 From Carsten Lohrke 2005-09-26 06:24:21 0000 -------
Heinrich, KDE supports it with the following Qt patch applied:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109386

------- Comment #65 From Heinrich Wendel (RETIRED) 2005-09-26 07:02:30 0000 -------
is this stable? what about putting it in portage, at least as use flag or 
experimental or something like that?

------- Comment #66 From Carsten Lohrke 2005-09-26 09:05:34 0000 -------
Probably time to reopen, since the discussion is ging on...

(In reply to comment #65)
> is this stable? what about putting it in portage, at least as use flag or 
> experimental or something like that?

I did not try. Personally I vote for applying the patch to Qt-3.3.5 and
supporting it with KDE 3.5, but not 3.4.x, if we do not encounter a lot of other
applications breaking due to -fvisibilty*.

------- Comment #67 From Diego E. 'Flameeyes' Pettenò 2005-09-26 09:41:16 0000 -------
I'm for NOT patching and NOT trying it at all. 
We already saw a lot of problems between KDE and Qt, with patches that were 
told to fix Qt problems. This is not the case, as I blogged, I had to disable 
the visibility stuff from 3.5 to have arts working. 
It tries to force an ABI setting in kde libraries and programs WITHOUT control 
over the ABI settings of the imported library. Every other C++ library would 
have the SAME exact problem as Qt. 
 

------- Comment #68 From Heinrich Wendel (RETIRED) 2005-09-26 09:49:16 0000 -------
I don't really know about the technical stuff here, but KDE claims to properly 
support it with 3.5. Still you have problems with arts, but did you use the qt 
patch, maybe it's even something that will be fixed if you report it. 

------- Comment #69 From Diego E. 'Flameeyes' Pettenò 2005-09-26 09:58:09 0000 -------
See this bug: http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109386 
 
I know for sure of arts/knotify because they are the only thing in my system 
that were built with visibility enabled (it was still disabled in kde-meta, 
but enable in kde eclass). Recompiled without visibility, arts, knotify and 
kmail doesn't crash anymore. 
 

------- Comment #70 From Heinrich Wendel (RETIRED) 2005-09-26 10:03:45 0000 -------
that might have been the problem, maybe something of the rest needed 
visibility as well for arts to work correctly 

------- Comment #71 From Diego E. 'Flameeyes' Pettenò 2005-09-26 10:26:36 0000 -------
arts has NO dependency on the rest of kde, it would work WITHOUT anything else 
in kde... 
it was SEGFAULTING within STL code. 
It was NOT because visibility was missing 
it was because the visibility WAS PRESENT. 
 
They said 3.4 would have used it correctly, it didn't. 
They said 3.4.2 with the Qt patch would have used it correctly, it doesn't. 
They say 3.5 with another Qt patch will work, but I'm not sure if it's the 
case. As I said, Qt is NOT the ONLY C++ lib that is used by KDE, and basically 
NO lib are safe with -fvisibility=hidden enabled in user program. 
 

------- Comment #72 From Carsten Lohrke 2005-09-26 10:31:16 0000 -------
(In reply to comment #67)
> I'm for NOT patching and NOT trying it at all. 

As I said I didn't tried it yet and Qt 3.3.5 is hard masked, so it doesn't harm
to test as you apparently did. I can live without the visibility support.

------- Comment #73 From SpanKY 2005-09-26 10:33:04 0000 -------
why is this re-opened ?

if you want a bug to track KDE visibility stuff, file a new one

the toolchain issues for which this bug exists are resolved

------- Comment #74 From Jose daLuz 2005-09-26 10:42:42 0000 -------
I opened bug 107193, now closed as a duplicate, but that was just for
ksvg/kgamma.  If someone who understands the broader issue of visibility much
better than I do would open a new bug, I do still have questions regarding what
workarounds are available.

------- Comment #75 From Carsten Lohrke 2005-09-26 10:57:11 0000 -------
(In reply to comment #73)
> why is this re-opened ?

Sorry, I assumed this bug would still be assigned to kde when reopening.

------- Comment #76 From Heinrich Wendel (RETIRED) 2005-09-26 11:25:24 0000 -------
ok, but fact is that you didn't test arts with qt and the visibility patch 

------- Comment #77 From Diego E. 'Flameeyes' Pettenò 2005-12-30 05:14:51 0000 -------
*** Bug 116873 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #78 From Diego E. 'Flameeyes' Pettenò 2006-01-10 16:39:42 0000 -------
*** Bug 118554 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #79 From Michael Dale Long 2006-01-11 08:44:38 0000 -------
I'm having problems with this in kdegraphics.  Nothing else on my system is
having problems with this.  My info is in Bug 118554.

------- Comment #80 From Simon Strandman 2006-01-11 12:57:14 0000 -------
@Michael:

You could try applying this patch to your gcc:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-05/msg00391.html

But I can't promise it wont break anything. :)

------- Comment #81 From Diego E. 'Flameeyes' Pettenò 2006-02-15 13:27:01 0000 -------
*** Bug 122957 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #82 From Diego E. 'Flameeyes' Pettenò 2006-03-05 05:48:55 0000 -------
*** Bug 125048 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #83 From Diego E. 'Flameeyes' Pettenò 2006-03-11 14:50:57 0000 -------
*** Bug 125856 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #84 From Diego E. 'Flameeyes' Pettenò 2006-03-18 09:43:23 0000 -------
*** Bug 121134 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #85 From Jakub Moc (RETIRED) 2006-03-29 10:40:49 0000 -------
*** Bug 128016 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #86 From Diego E. 'Flameeyes' Pettenò 2006-04-25 11:34:49 0000 -------
*** Bug 131247 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug