Bug 72620 – balsa-2.0.15-r2.ebuild alpha keyword wanted and old version removal to support old gpgme (dependancy) version removal

• Status: RESOLVED FIXED
• Product: Gentoo Linux

[Description Daniel Black (RETIRED) 2004-11-27 04:22:12 UTC]

Can the following ebuild be stablised.
mail-client/balsa/balsa-2.0.15-r2.ebuild x86 alpha

Can the following ebuilds please be removed:
mail-client/balsa/balsa-2.0.14.ebuild
mail-client/balsa/balsa-2.0.15-r1.ebuild
app-crypt/seahorse/seahorse-0.6.3.ebuild

[Comment 1 Mike Gardiner (RETIRED) 2004-11-30 04:04:41 UTC]

stablising:
x86: mail-client/balsa/balsa-2.0.15-r2.ebuild

removal:
rm: mail-client/balsa/balsa-2.0.14.ebuild
rm: app-crypt/seahorse/seahors-0.6.3.ebuild
mail-client/balsa/balsa-2.0.15-r1.ebuild can't be removed until -r2 is alpha.

[Comment 2 Daniel Black (RETIRED) 2004-12-11 13:50:36 UTC]

alpha people: forgot to add a test plan

differences between mail-client/balsa/balsa-2.0.15-r1.ebuild and -r2 are:
1. it depends on the next revision of gpgme (0.3.14-r1) which installs libraries to a different location. 
2. It does some checking for gnupg-1.9+ and uses gpg2 if present.

test stratergy:
ensure that only gpgme-0.3.14-r1 is installed an no other pre 0.9.0 ebuilds. 0.9.0+ ebuilds of gpgme are on their own slot and won't affect the test.

See if  mail-client/balsa/balsa-2.0.15-r2 compiles/installs. A quick run of the balsa gui should be enought to confirm.

[Comment 3 Daniel Black (RETIRED) 2004-12-11 17:11:18 UTC]

thanks for the alpha keyword test kloeri and thanks foser for allowing me to remove lots of pain in the neck gpgme ebuilds.