First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 69343
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: REOPENED
Resolution:
Assigned To: Gentoo Linux Gnome Desktop Team <gnome@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Brant Gurganus <bugs.gentoo.org@gurganus.name>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
gnome2.eclass-srctest.patch Modify src_test() for gnome2 packages to use a temporary home directory patch Kevin F. Quinn (RETIRED) 2006-08-09 12:16 0000 855 bytes Details | Diff
emerge.info emerge --info text/plain Dustin Polke 2006-12-11 08:54 0000 6.48 KB Details
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 69343 depends on: 95805 100523 126643 126847 129079 132501 139974 142585 147448 147680 148808 150709 157820 162044 165098 166293 176202 176809 181906 188043 190066 191535 192302 192406 192640 192641 192732 196490 206671 212983 216146 218235 228683 237498 238995 239339 241612 242146 245103 262324 262325 264219 264817 265205 265911 270105 270107 272450 285675 285687 285706 285715 286375 292478 Show dependency tree
Bug 69343 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.








View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug


Description:   Opened: 2004-10-28 19:43 0000
The test-async-cancel test for gnome-vfs-2.8.1 fails.

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Emerge gnome-vfs-2.8.1 with FEATURES="makecheck"
Actual Results:  
make  check-TESTS
make[2]: Entering directory
`/var/tmp/portage/gnome-vfs-2.8.1/work/gnome-vfs-2.8.1/test'
Testing get file info...
Testing open, close...
Testing read, close...
Testing cancellation...
Testing failed opens...
Testing read, cancel, closes...
Testing directory loads** Message: test failed: load directory cancel 2: job
never went away delay 1
** Message: test failed: load directory cancel 2: job never went away delay 10
...
Testing directory finds...
Testing shutdown...
FAIL: test-async-cancel
PASS: test-escape
PASS: test-uri
You should see a warning and 2 critical errors below.

(process:30986): libgnomevfs-WARNING **: Attempt to set the thread_count_limit
below 2
Trying to start a job with priority = -11; should result in a critical error

(process:30986): libgnomevfs-CRITICAL **: file gnome-vfs-async-ops.c: line 688
(gnome_vfs_async_get_file_info): assertion `priority >= GNOME_VFS_PRIORITY_MIN'
failed
Trying to start a job with priority = 11; should result in a critical error

(process:30986): libgnomevfs-CRITICAL **: file gnome-vfs-async-ops.c: line 689
(gnome_vfs_async_get_file_info): assertion `priority <= GNOME_VFS_PRIORITY_MAX'
failed
No warning or error messages are expected beyond this point
I/O warning : failed to load external entity "../test/queue-test-config.xml"
Didn't find a valid settings file at ../test/queue-test-config.xml
Use the GNOME_VFS_TEST_CONFIG_FILE environment variable to specify a different
location.

(process:30986): gnome-vfs-modules-WARNING **: failed to create trash item cache
file

(process:30986): gnome-vfs-modules-WARNING **: failed to create trash item cache
file

(process:30986): gnome-vfs-modules-WARNING **: failed to create trash item cache
file
PASS: test-queue
Initializing gnome-vfs...
Creating async context...
Starting open for `./test.input'...
Main loop running.
Open failed: Invalid URI.
Main loop finished.
Test async queue efficiency ...Passed
All done
Test passed
PASS: ./auto-test
===================
1 of 5 tests failed
===================


Expected Results:  
All tests should pass or be changed to work within the sandbox.

Portage 2.0.51-r2 (default-x86-2004.2, gcc-3.4.2, glibc-2.3.4.20041006-r0,
2.6.9-gentoo-r1 i686)
=================================================================
System uname: 2.6.9-gentoo-r1 i686 Mobile Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 - M CPU 2.20GHz
Gentoo Base System version 1.6.4
distcc 2.16 i686-pc-linux-gnu (protocols 1 and 2) (default port 3632)
[disabled]ccache version 2.3 [enabled]
Autoconf: sys-devel/autoconf-2.59-r5
Automake: sys-devel/automake-1.8.5-r1
Binutils: sys-devel/binutils-2.15.92.0.2-r1
Headers:  sys-kernel/linux26-headers-2.6.8.1-r1
Libtools: sys-devel/libtool-1.5.2-r5
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="x86 ~x86"
AUTOCLEAN="yes"
CFLAGS="-O3 -march=pentium4m -mtune=pentium4m -maccumulate-outgoing-args
-fprefetch-loop-arrays -ftracer -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer -frename-registers
-ffast-math"
CHOST="i686-pc-linux-gnu"
COMPILER=""
CONFIG_PROTECT="/etc /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/xkb /usr/kde/2/share/config
/usr/kde/3.3/env /usr/kde/3.3/share/config /usr/kde/3.3/shutdown
/usr/kde/3/share/config /usr/lib/mozilla/defaults/pref /usr/share/config
/var/qmail/control"
CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK="/etc/gconf /etc/terminfo /etc/env.d"
CXXFLAGS="-O3 -march=pentium4m -mtune=pentium4m -maccumulate-outgoing-args
-fprefetch-loop-arrays -ftracer -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer -frename-registers
-ffast-math"
DISTDIR="/usr/portage/distfiles"
FEATURES="autoaddcvs ccache distlocks fixpackages maketest sandbox strict"
GENTOO_MIRRORS="ftp://hercules.cs.rose-hulman.edu/linux/gentoo"
MAKEOPTS="-j2"
PKGDIR="/usr/portage/packages"
PORTAGE_TMPDIR="/var/tmp"
PORTDIR="/usr/portage"
PORTDIR_OVERLAY=""
SYNC="rsync://hercules.cs.rose-hulman.edu/portage"
USE="X acpi alsa avi berkdb bitmap-fonts cdr crypt cups dga dvd encode esd f77
foomaticdb gdbm gif gnome gnutls gpm gstreamer gtk gtk2 imlib java jpeg kde
kerberos krb4 ldap libg++ libwww mad mikmod mmap mmx mng motif mozilla mpeg
mysql ncurses nls nptl offensive oggvorbis opengl pam pcre pdflib perl pic png
pnp ppds python qt quicktime readline samba sasl sdl slang spell sse ssl svg
tcpd tiff truetype unicode wmf x86 xml xml2 xmms xprint xv zlib"

------- Comment #1 From foser (RETIRED) 2004-10-29 02:47:40 0000 -------
just ditch maketest from features.

And maybe lower your cflags.

If you want to look into it, fine. But I don't think it's wise to spend time on tests that aren't maintained half of the time.

------- Comment #2 From foser (RETIRED) 2004-10-29 03:12:27 0000 -------
*** Bug 69347 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #3 From foser (RETIRED) 2004-11-02 03:22:38 0000 -------
*** Bug 69797 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #4 From John Altstadt 2004-11-13 09:13:54 0000 -------
If maketest fails, shouldn't the problem be reported upstream?

------- Comment #5 From foser (RETIRED) 2004-11-14 01:39:05 0000 -------
*** Bug 71061 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #6 From foser (RETIRED) 2004-11-15 10:26:07 0000 -------
*** Bug 71061 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #7 From foser (RETIRED) 2004-11-20 09:21:46 0000 -------
*** Bug 71775 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #8 From Mike Gardiner (RETIRED) 2004-11-22 09:38:00 0000 -------
Taken from #71070

I'm going to propose something for these maketest "bugs". 

While we, the GNOME team, are not in any way opposed to fixing bugs in the software we maintain, we do not currently have the time required to catch these "maketest bugs", and patch them. This is compounded by the fact that only a small number of users use FEATURES="maketest".

Although we will not have the time to fix these "bugs" ourselves, we will happily test any patch you can supply to us, or any formed solution to the problem. Should you be unable to provide such a patch, then the easiest course of action may be upstream - where they have a better understanding of the software, even than us.

While FEATURES="maketest" is available in portage, you must understand it is not uniformly supported across all upstream developers, and more often than not, the tests performed by "make test" are outdated, and are known to fail.

------- Comment #9 From Mike Gardiner (RETIRED) 2004-11-22 09:39:18 0000 -------
*** Bug 71070 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #10 From Mike Gardiner (RETIRED) 2004-11-26 23:03:27 0000 -------
*** Bug 72592 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #11 From Mike Gardiner (RETIRED) 2004-12-21 17:01:26 0000 -------
*** Bug 75244 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #12 From foser (RETIRED) 2005-01-17 10:34:01 0000 -------
*** Bug 67006 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #13 From Sascha Silbe 2005-01-21 18:13:10 0000 -------
Then please add RESTRICT=maketest to all the ebuilds you maintain, so we can
use this feature (that's very useful in many cases) for the rest of the system.

------- Comment #14 From Joe McCann (RETIRED) 2005-02-09 02:11:41 0000 -------
*** Bug 81340 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #15 From Lars Strojny 2005-02-09 02:57:34 0000 -------
I fully agree with Sascha Silbe's post. Please add RESTRICT!

------- Comment #16 From foser (RETIRED) 2005-02-09 08:28:18 0000 -------
*** Bug 81314 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #17 From Mike Gardiner (RETIRED) 2005-02-11 17:46:20 0000 -------
*** Bug 81681 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #18 From Joe McCann (RETIRED) 2005-03-09 20:57:15 0000 -------
*** Bug 84698 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #19 From Mike Gardiner (RETIRED) 2005-04-16 04:27:22 0000 -------
*** Bug 83915 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #20 From foser (RETIRED) 2005-05-18 16:45:10 0000 -------
*** Bug 92407 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #21 From foser (RETIRED) 2005-06-14 08:39:07 0000 -------
*** Bug 96083 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #22 From Attila Stehr 2005-06-14 09:37:31 0000 -------
(In reply to comment #8)
> Taken from #71070
> 
> I'm going to propose something for these maketest "bugs". 
> 
> While we, the GNOME team, are not in any way opposed to fixing bugs in the
software we maintain, we do not currently have the time required to catch these
"maketest bugs", and patch them. This is compounded by the fact that only a
small number of users use FEATURES="maketest".

Hum ... Probably they should ... what says the handbook about this?!

------- Comment #23 From Jakub Moc (RETIRED) 2005-07-03 10:47:01 0000 -------
*** Bug 97842 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #24 From John N. Laliberte (RETIRED) 2005-07-29 16:23:14 0000 -------
*** Bug 99424 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #25 From John N. Laliberte (RETIRED) 2005-07-29 16:23:41 0000 -------
*** Bug 99429 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #26 From John N. Laliberte (RETIRED) 2005-08-06 04:43:42 0000 -------
*** Bug 100523 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #27 From Mike Gardiner (RETIRED) 2005-09-24 05:09:32 0000 -------
*** Bug 107075 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #28 From John N. Laliberte (RETIRED) 2005-09-30 06:24:56 0000 -------
*** Bug 107700 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #29 From Brian Harring 2005-10-08 05:16:57 0000 -------
Re-opening.

As a general rule of thumb, we don't leave landmines (known failings) in the
tree to try and get others to fix it (yes that's rude and presumptious also).

If it doesn't work, restrict the bugger so that those who want it to work for
those packages do the work, rather then those who do testing getting bit in the
ass by it.

------- Comment #30 From Benno Schulenberg 2005-10-11 11:23:53 0000 -------
One more request for RESTRICT="test" on ebuilds where the tests don't work.

------- Comment #31 From Mike Gardiner (RETIRED) 2005-11-01 01:31:06 0000 -------
*** Bug 110891 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #32 From Jakub Moc (RETIRED) 2006-01-11 13:26:45 0000 -------
*** Bug 118688 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #33 From Saleem Abdulrasool (RETIRED) 2006-01-21 23:06:24 0000 -------
Add libbonoboui to that list.  It fails with access to /root/.gnome2_private

------- Comment #34 From Attila Stehr 2006-01-23 16:04:51 0000 -------
still present with file-roller-2.12.2


Making check in help
make[1]: Entering directory
`/var/tmp/portage/file-roller-2.12.2/work/file-roller-2.12.2/help'
xmllint --noout --noent --path C:./C --xinclude --postvalid ./C/file-roller.xml
./C/file-roller.xml:92: element revnumber: validity error : Element application
is not declared in revnumber list of possible children
./C/file-roller.xml:141: element releaseinfo: validity error : Element
application is not declared in releaseinfo list of possible children
Document ./C/file-roller.xml does not validate
xmllint --noout --noent --path de:./de --xinclude --postvalid
./de/file-roller.xml
./de/file-roller.xml:98: element revnumber: validity error : Element
application is not declared in revnumber list of possible children
./de/file-roller.xml:147: element releaseinfo: validity error : Element
application is not declared in releaseinfo list of possible children
Document ./de/file-roller.xml does not validate
xmllint --noout --noent --path es:./es --xinclude --postvalid
./es/file-roller.xml
./es/file-roller.xml:98: element revnumber: validity error : Element
application is not declared in revnumber list of possible children
./es/file-roller.xml:147: element releaseinfo: validity error : Element
application is not declared in releaseinfo list of possible children
./es/file-roller.xml:480: element para: validity error : Element xef is not
declared in para list of possible children
./es/file-roller.xml:480: element xef: validity error : No declaration for
element xef
./es/file-roller.xml:480: element xef: validity error : No declaration for
attribute linkend of element xef
Document ./es/file-roller.xml does not validate
xmllint --noout --noent --path fr:./fr --xinclude --postvalid
./fr/file-roller.xml
./fr/file-roller.xml:98: element revnumber: validity error : Element
application is not declared in revnumber list of possible children
./fr/file-roller.xml:147: element releaseinfo: validity error : Element
application is not declared in releaseinfo list of possible children
Document ./fr/file-roller.xml does not validate
xmllint --noout --noent --path it:./it --xinclude --postvalid
./it/file-roller.xml
./it/file-roller.xml:98: element revnumber: validity error : Element
application is not declared in revnumber list of possible children
./it/file-roller.xml:147: element releaseinfo: validity error : Element
application is not declared in releaseinfo list of possible children
Document ./it/file-roller.xml does not validate
xmllint --noout --noent --path ja:./ja --xinclude --postvalid
./ja/file-roller.xml
./ja/file-roller.xml:98: element revnumber: validity error : Element
application is not declared in revnumber list of possible children
./ja/file-roller.xml:147: element releaseinfo: validity error : Element
application is not declared in releaseinfo list of possible children
Document ./ja/file-roller.xml does not validate
xmllint --noout --noent --path ko:./ko --xinclude --postvalid
./ko/file-roller.xml
./ko/file-roller.xml:98: element revnumber: validity error : Element
application is not declared in revnumber list of possible children
./ko/file-roller.xml:147: element releaseinfo: validity error : Element
application is not declared in releaseinfo list of possible children
Document ./ko/file-roller.xml does not validate
xmllint --noout --noent --path ru:./ru --xinclude --postvalid
./ru/file-roller.xml
./ru/file-roller.xml:98: element revnumber: validity error : Element
application is not declared in revnumber list of possible children
./ru/file-roller.xml:147: element releaseinfo: validity error : Element
application is not declared in releaseinfo list of possible children
Document ./ru/file-roller.xml does not validate
xmllint --noout --noent --path sv:./sv --xinclude --postvalid
./sv/file-roller.xml
./sv/file-roller.xml:98: element revnumber: validity error : Element
application is not declared in revnumber list of possible children
./sv/file-roller.xml:147: element releaseinfo: validity error : Element
application is not declared in releaseinfo list of possible children
Document ./sv/file-roller.xml does not validate
xmllint --noout --noent --path uk:./uk --xinclude --postvalid
./uk/file-roller.xml
./uk/file-roller.xml:98: element revnumber: validity error : Element
application is not declared in revnumber list of possible children
./uk/file-roller.xml:147: element releaseinfo: validity error : Element
application is not declared in releaseinfo list of possible children
Document ./uk/file-roller.xml does not validate
xmllint --noout --noent --path zh_CN:./zh_CN --xinclude --postvalid
./zh_CN/file-roller.xml
./zh_CN/file-roller.xml:98: element revnumber: validity error : Element
application is not declared in revnumber list of possible children
./zh_CN/file-roller.xml:147: element releaseinfo: validity error : Element
application is not declared in releaseinfo list of possible children
Document ./zh_CN/file-roller.xml does not validate
xmllint --noout --noent --path zh_HK:./zh_HK --xinclude --postvalid
./zh_HK/file-roller.xml
./zh_HK/file-roller.xml:98: element revnumber: validity error : Element
application is not declared in revnumber list of possible children
./zh_HK/file-roller.xml:147: element releaseinfo: validity error : Element
application is not declared in releaseinfo list of possible children
Document ./zh_HK/file-roller.xml does not validate
xmllint --noout --noent --path zh_TW:./zh_TW --xinclude --postvalid
./zh_TW/file-roller.xml
./zh_TW/file-roller.xml:98: element revnumber: validity error : Element
application is not declared in revnumber list of possible children
./zh_TW/file-roller.xml:147: element releaseinfo: validity error : Element
application is not declared in releaseinfo list of possible children
Document ./zh_TW/file-roller.xml does not validate
make[1]: *** [check-doc-docs] Fehler 3
make[1]: Leaving directory
`/var/tmp/portage/file-roller-2.12.2/work/file-roller-2.12.2/help'
make: *** [check-recursive] Fehler 1

!!! ERROR: app-arch/file-roller-2.12.2 failed.

------- Comment #35 From Attila Stehr 2006-01-23 16:11:00 0000 -------
btw: 
I agree with Mr. Brian Harring! I think that tests are not implemented to annoy
people but to point out possible problems. Maybe the failing tests help with
finding a solution for other bugs - like (file-roller) bug #114780...

------- Comment #36 From Saleem Abdulrasool (RETIRED) 2006-01-24 13:38:34 0000 -------
The tests are not a major priority at this point.  We are planning on dealing
with these soon though.

------- Comment #37 From Attila Stehr 2006-01-24 16:04:39 0000 -------
ok =)

------- Comment #38 From Brian Harring 2006-01-25 04:01:32 0000 -------
(In reply to comment #36)
> The tests are not a major priority at this point.  We are planning on dealing
> with these soon though.
Dealing with 'em how though?

Foser's last decree was that they would be left as landmines; goes without
saying that's a no go :)

RESTRICT="test" would at least keep the ebuilds functional, and not annoy
people enough to disable test globally (since most don't know they can disable
it per package via bashrc).

------- Comment #39 From Attila Stehr 2006-01-25 04:11:41 0000 -------
Or simply alter make.conf an emerging the 'faulty' package manually...

I wouln't like test restricted since I usually assume that tests _are_ made.
The next problem, which devs are making a list, kepping that list in their mind
and reenable tests for new version?!

Anyway, please give (me) a link where the bashrc - thing is explained?

------- Comment #40 From foser (RETIRED) 2006-02-26 08:05:10 0000 -------
Adding restricts is like having your minesweepers only search the areas that
are known landmine-free, in portage terms it's like disabling sandbox, because
there's a sandbox violation.

If you really want to run tests, then you should be able to assume the tests
actually get run, whatever their outcome is.

------- Comment #41 From John N. Laliberte (RETIRED) 2006-03-30 18:34:18 0000 -------
*** Bug 100523 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #42 From John N. Laliberte (RETIRED) 2006-03-30 18:34:45 0000 -------
*** Bug 126643 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #43 From Jakub Moc (RETIRED) 2006-04-07 00:07:11 0000 -------
*** Bug 129079 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #44 From Jakub Moc (RETIRED) 2006-05-06 23:06:01 0000 -------
*** Bug 132523 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #45 From SpanKY 2006-05-06 23:55:51 0000 -------
so how does duping all the broken packages to this bug help ?

it's a tracker, not a dupe dump

------- Comment #46 From Jakub Moc (RETIRED) 2006-05-07 03:19:42 0000 -------
*** Bug 132523 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #47 From Daniel Gryniewicz 2006-07-15 13:42:28 0000 -------
*** Bug 140221 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #48 From Jakub Moc (RETIRED) 2006-07-31 15:57:58 0000 -------
*** Bug 142347 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #49 From Kevin F. Quinn (RETIRED) 2006-08-09 12:16:15 0000 -------
Created an attachment (id=93862) [details]
Modify src_test() for gnome2 packages to use a temporary home directory

This is a start.  Many gnome packages get upset when the tests are run because
they try to access the default gnome home directory, ~/.gnome2.  Obviously this
isn't a good idea.  Setting GNOME22_USER_DIR overrides this default; the patch
implements a tweaked src_test() in gnome2.eclass as I figure it won't hurt to
do this for all gnome packages; it's likely they all do the same thing.

This gets gnome-vfs-2.14.2 to pass its tests with a vanilla compiler (fails
with the hardened compiler because the test makefile misses out some link
dependencies on the test executables, but I'll deal with that another time).

------- Comment #50 From Brant Gurganus 2006-08-09 13:28:00 0000 -------
I haven't tested it since I'm at work, but that looks reasonable to me Kevin.
It is probably worth suggesting that upstream since if the tests ever do any
modification of user directory state, they shouldn't mess with the *real* user
directory state.

------- Comment #51 From Abraham Marin Perez 2006-11-09 03:48:55 0000 -------
I've encountered a bug that _I believe_ is not listed here yet nor it is
related with the gnome-home directory issue; if so, I'm sorry. 

The problem is in gnome-base/gnome-libs-1.4.2, the failing test being
metadata.test. The given error message:

make[3]: Entering directory
`/var/tmp/portage/gnome-libs-1.4.2/work/gnome-libs-1.4.2/test-suite'
FAIL: metadata.test
PASS: parse-path.test
PASS: skel.test
PASS: split.test
PASS: trigs.test
===================
1 of 5 tests failed
===================
make[3]: *** [check-TESTS] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory
`/var/tmp/portage/gnome-libs-1.4.2/work/gnome-libs-1.4.2/test-suite'
make[2]: *** [check-am] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory
`/var/tmp/portage/gnome-libs-1.4.2/work/gnome-libs-1.4.2/test-suite'
make[1]: *** [check-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory
`/var/tmp/portage/gnome-libs-1.4.2/work/gnome-libs-1.4.2/test-suite'
make: *** [check-recursive] Error 1

####################
emerge --info

Portage 2.1.1-r1 (default-linux/x86/2006.0, gcc-3.4.6, glibc-2.3.5-r2,
2.6.17-gentoo-r4 i686)
=================================================================
System uname: 2.6.17-gentoo-r4 i686 AMD Athlon(tm) XP 1700+
Gentoo Base System version 1.12.6
Last Sync: Wed, 08 Nov 2006 09:50:01 +0000
distcc 2.16 i686-pc-linux-gnu (protocols 1 and 2) (default port 3632)
[disabled]
ccache version 2.3 [enabled]
app-admin/eselect-compiler: [Not Present]
dev-java/java-config: 1.3.7, 2.0.30
dev-lang/python:     2.3.5-r2, 2.4.3-r4
dev-python/pycrypto: 2.0.1-r5
dev-util/ccache:     2.3
dev-util/confcache:  [Not Present]
sys-apps/sandbox:    1.2.17
sys-devel/autoconf:  2.13, 2.60
sys-devel/automake:  1.4_p6, 1.5, 1.6.3, 1.7.9-r1, 1.8.5-r3, 1.9.6-r2
sys-devel/binutils:  2.16.1-r3
sys-devel/gcc-config: 1.3.13-r4
sys-devel/libtool:   1.5.22
virtual/os-headers:  2.6.8.1-r1, 2.6.17-r1
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="x86"
AUTOCLEAN="yes"
CBUILD="i686-pc-linux-gnu"
CFLAGS="-O2 -pipe -march=athlon-xp"
CHOST="i686-pc-linux-gnu"
CONFIG_PROTECT="/etc /usr/kde/3.3/env /usr/kde/3.3/share/config
/usr/kde/3.3/shutdown /usr/kde/3.4/env /usr/kde/3.4/share/config
/usr/kde/3.4/shutdown /usr/share/X11/xkb /usr/share/config
/usr/share/texmf/dvipdfm/config/ /usr/share/texmf/dvips/config/
/usr/share/texmf/tex/generic/config/ /usr/share/texmf/tex/platex/config/
/usr/share/texmf/xdvi/"
CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK="/etc/env.d /etc/env.d/java/ /etc/gconf
/etc/java-config/vms/ /etc/revdep-rebuild /etc/splash /etc/terminfo"
CXXFLAGS="-O2 -pipe -march=athlon-xp"
DISTDIR="/usr/portage/distfiles"
FEATURES="autoconfig ccache distlocks metadata-transfer sandbox sfperms strict
stricter test"
GENTOO_MIRRORS="http://ftp.caliu.info/pub/gentoo/
http://mirror.ovh.net/gentoo-distfiles/"
LANG="es_ES.UTF-8@euro"
LC_ALL="es_ES.UTF-8@euro"
LINGUAS="es en"
MAKEOPTS="-j2"
PKGDIR="/usr/portage/packages"
PORTAGE_RSYNC_OPTS="--recursive --links --safe-links --perms --times --compress
--force --whole-file --delete --delete-after --stats --timeout=180
--exclude='/distfiles' --exclude='/local' --exclude='/packages'"
PORTAGE_TMPDIR="/var/tmp"
PORTDIR="/usr/portage"
PORTDIR_OVERLAY="/usr/local/portage"
SYNC="rsync://rsync.europe.gentoo.org/gentoo-portage"
USE="3dnow X a52 acpi alsa apache2 asf audiofile avi bash-completion bidi
bitmap-fonts bzip2 bzlib canna cdr cjk cli cracklib crypt cups dbus dga
directfb divx4linux dlloader doc dri dvb dvd dvdr dvdread eds elibc_glibc
emboss encode esd evo exif fbcon fftw firefox flac foomaticdb freewnn ftp gb
gcj gd gdbm gif glut gmp gnome gpm gstreamer gtk gtk2 gtkhtml hal iconv imlib
input_devices_evdev input_devices_keyboard input_devices_mouse iodbc isdnlog
java jikes jpeg kde kernel_linux libg++ libwww linguas_en linguas_es mad
memlimit mikmod mime mmx motif mozilla mp3 mpeg msn nas nls nptl nptlonly
nsplugin nvidia odbc offensive ogg oggvorbis openal opengl pam pcre pdflib perl
png pnp posix ppds pppd qt3 qt4 quicktime readline reflection sdl session
sharedmem simplexml spell spl ssl svg svga sysvipc szip tcltk tcpd tetex theora
threads tiff truetype truetype-fonts type1-fonts udev unicode usb userland_GNU
video_cards_nvidia videos vorbis win32codecs wmf x86 xine xml xorg xprint xv
xvid zlib"
Unset:  CTARGET, EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS, INSTALL_MASK, LDFLAGS,
PORTAGE_RSYNC_EXTRA_OPTS

------- Comment #52 From Dustin Polke 2006-12-11 08:53:11 0000 -------
Here is another one: gnome-python-desktop-2.16.0

Dies with the following output:

Making check in tests
make[1]: Entering directory
`/var/tmp/portage/gnome-python-desktop-2.16.0/work/gnome-python-desktop-2.16.0/tests'
make  check-local
make[2]: Entering directory
`/var/tmp/portage/gnome-python-desktop-2.16.0/work/gnome-python-desktop-2.16.0/tests'
Trying to import module gnomeapplet...  ok.
Trying to import module gnomeprint...  ok.
Trying to import module gnomeprint.ui...  ok.
Trying to import module gtksourceview...  ok.
Trying to import module wnck...  ok.
Trying to import module totem.plparser...  ok.
Trying to import module gtop...  ok.
Trying to import module nautilusburn... 
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "./runtests.py", line 6, in ?
    import common
  File
"/var/tmp/portage/gnome-python-desktop-2.16.0/work/gnome-python-desktop-2.16.0/tests/common.py",
line 32, in ?
    __import__(module) # try to import the module to catch undefined symbols
ImportError: libnautilus-burn.so.3: cannot open shared object file: No such
file or directory
make[2]: *** [check-local] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory
`/var/tmp/portage/gnome-python-desktop-2.16.0/work/gnome-python-desktop-2.16.0/tests'
make[1]: *** [check-am] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory
`/var/tmp/portage/gnome-python-desktop-2.16.0/work/gnome-python-desktop-2.16.0/tests'
make: *** [check-recursive] Error 1

emerge --info follows as attachment.

BR,
Dustin

------- Comment #53 From Dustin Polke 2006-12-11 08:54:10 0000 -------
Created an attachment (id=103812) [details]
emerge --info

First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug