Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 62664 - dev-java/bsh-2.0_beta2 ebuild (from sources)
Summary: dev-java/bsh-2.0_beta2 ebuild (from sources)
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All All
: High enhancement (vote)
Assignee: Java team
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: EBUILD
: 63248 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks: 81879
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2004-09-02 15:25 UTC by Andrew Kirilenko
Modified: 2005-03-10 09:47 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments
ebuild itself (bsh-2.0_beta2.ebuild,2.04 KB, text/plain)
2004-09-02 15:27 UTC, Andrew Kirilenko
Details
build patch (bsh2-build.patch,1.66 KB, patch)
2004-09-02 15:27 UTC, Andrew Kirilenko
Details | Diff
optional readline patch (bsh2-readline.patch,5.30 KB, patch)
2004-09-02 15:28 UTC, Andrew Kirilenko
Details | Diff
console with readline support (bsh.Console,835 bytes, text/plain)
2004-09-02 15:28 UTC, Andrew Kirilenko
Details
interpreter with readline support (bsh.Interpreter,850 bytes, text/plain)
2004-09-02 15:29 UTC, Andrew Kirilenko
Details
improved ebuild (bsh-2.0_beta2.ebuild,2.08 KB, text/plain)
2004-09-02 16:05 UTC, Andrew Kirilenko
Details
another ebuild :) (bsh-2.0_beta2.ebuild,2.07 KB, text/plain)
2004-09-02 17:32 UTC, Andrew Kirilenko
Details
bsh-2.0_beta2.ebuild (bsh-2.0_beta2.ebuild,1.79 KB, text/plain)
2005-02-14 10:46 UTC, Saleem Abdulrasool (RETIRED)
Details
Bsh Ebuild that compiles from sources and do not modifies classpath. (bsh-2.0_beta2.ebuild,1.51 KB, text/plain)
2005-02-15 10:43 UTC, Francisco José Cañizares Santofimia
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Andrew Kirilenko 2004-09-02 15:25:25 UTC
Hello!

Here is ebuild/supprting files for new bsh to build it from sources. I have added all necessary deps (and, probably, some unnecessary). The main problem is tomcat-5 dep (which I have found in dev-java/bsf).

Best regards,
Andrew.
Comment 1 Andrew Kirilenko 2004-09-02 15:27:17 UTC
Created attachment 38780 [details]
ebuild itself
Comment 2 Andrew Kirilenko 2004-09-02 15:27:43 UTC
Created attachment 38781 [details, diff]
build patch
Comment 3 Andrew Kirilenko 2004-09-02 15:28:07 UTC
Created attachment 38782 [details, diff]
optional readline patch
Comment 4 Andrew Kirilenko 2004-09-02 15:28:49 UTC
Created attachment 38783 [details]
console with readline support
Comment 5 Andrew Kirilenko 2004-09-02 15:29:11 UTC
Created attachment 38784 [details]
interpreter with readline support
Comment 6 Andrew Kirilenko 2004-09-02 16:05:34 UTC
Created attachment 38785 [details]
improved ebuild
Comment 7 Andrew Kirilenko 2004-09-02 17:32:48 UTC
Created attachment 38787 [details]
another ebuild :)

Alwaus check your ebuilds before submitting :)))
Comment 8 Thomas Matthijs (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2004-09-19 14:46:26 UTC
*** Bug 63248 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 9 Karl Trygve Kalleberg (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2004-12-18 13:58:40 UTC
See #50306.

Please use java-pkg_jar-from instead of modifying the CLASSPATH env var.

See http://gentoo-wiki.com/Gentoo_Java_Policy for details.
Comment 10 Saleem Abdulrasool (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-02-14 10:46:38 UTC
Created attachment 51221 [details]
bsh-2.0_beta2.ebuild

Here is a probably broken ebuild that someone should test and try to fix.  It
was quickly hacked up when I wanted to put off some assembly coding :-p.  It
does however fix a few QA issues with the current ebuild, and merges the
changes from the blocked bug.
Comment 11 Francisco José Cañizares Santofimia 2005-02-15 10:43:11 UTC
Created attachment 51287 [details]
Bsh Ebuild that compiles from sources and do not modifies classpath.
Comment 12 Jan Brinkmann (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2005-03-10 09:47:13 UTC
> Here is a probably broken ebuild that someone should test and try to fix.  It
> was quickly hacked up when I wanted to put off some assembly coding :-p.  It
> does however fix a few QA issues with the current ebuild, and merges the
> changes from the blocked bug.

infact, that ebuild was broken :P. as you're a dev on your own, you should have recognized it since it was broken in many ways. you've got cvs access, so finish your work and commit things on your own. =)