Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 6136 - djvu plugin does not work with a GTK2 comiled mozilla-1.0
Summary: djvu plugin does not work with a GTK2 comiled mozilla-1.0
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 8774
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Current packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: x86 Linux
: High normal
Assignee: Martin Schlemmer (RETIRED)
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2002-08-07 04:19 UTC by Christian V. J. Brüssow
Modified: 2005-07-17 13:06 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Christian V. J. Brüssow 2002-08-07 04:19:38 UTC
Hi,

I have noticed, that the djvu plugin (see bug 5504) does not work with
mozilla 1.0, when mozilla is compiled with the USE flag "gtk2". Even
an unmerge of djvu, and a newly emerge didn't solved the problem.
The djvu plugin is not recognized by mozilla (does not show up in about:plugins).

Christian
Comment 1 Martin Schlemmer (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2002-09-08 03:41:57 UTC
I am guessing it uses gtk1, and thus do not work, as it have unresolved symbols.
Comment 2 foser (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2002-10-01 17:51:57 UTC
First of all gtk2 support for mozilla is buggy and in development anyway, so you
can't trust it. You can probably check if comment #1 is true by running mozilla
from the commandline with the plugin installed. 

I wanted to test myself, but i just rebuild my mozilla with gtk1 support again :/
Comment 3 Christian V. J. Brüssow 2002-10-02 09:22:21 UTC
I've also rebuild mozilla-1.0 with gtk1, because it was too buggy for me with
gtk2. The plugin itself does not use gtk at all. So I guess it is definitely a
mozilla/gtk2 problem. BTW, with the new djvu version (see bug #8295) the problem
remains the same. Another reason for me to switch back to mozilla/gtk1.
Comment 4 Martin Schlemmer (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2002-12-01 07:34:37 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 8774 ***