Bug 58940 – xtla-0.9 (new package)

• Status: RESOLVED FIXED
• Product: Gentoo Linux

[Description Esben Mose Hansen 2004-07-30 14:39:29 UTC]

Hi!

Please find attached xta-0.01.ebuild

xtla is a emacs front-end to the arch version control system. The arch version control system is already in portage under dev-util/tla. You could call tla a modern and better CVS, if you please.

I suggest app-xemacs/xtla.

Please note that the author does not specify a version number, so the 0.01 is just a bogus number. I'm not sure if this is the way to work around this issue. The ebuild should be renamable without any impact.

Please be gentle --- this is my first real ebuild :)

Esben

[Comment 1 Esben Mose Hansen 2004-07-30 14:40:37 UTC]

Created attachment 36483 [details]
xtla ebuild

[Comment 2 Anders Rune Jensen (RETIRED) 2004-08-20 08:05:13 UTC]

I have xtla installed from the latest arch version. It doesn't depend on xemacs in anyway.

[Comment 3 Esben Mose Hansen 2004-09-05 12:24:23 UTC]

Created attachment 39006 [details]
Ebuild for xtla 0.9 alpha

Of course xtla depends on XEmacs --- it's a elisp package! And there is a
similar package now under app-emacs/xtla. If there is a reason why this package
is ignored, please do tell and I'll fix it directly. 

Anyway, here's a version bump. It appear that the first released version  will
be 0.9, so I'm calling the release until then 0.9_alpha. Also, the build I
submitted earlier to XEmacs didn't work too well --- this one appears to do so.

Use/ignore.

[Comment 4 Anders Rune Jensen (RETIRED) 2004-09-05 12:41:13 UTC]

What I meant is that a the package or a similar package should be created for Emacs because xtla work just fine with my emacs-cvs version. Anyway I can see that it's now here so I remove myself from this bug.

[Comment 5 Esben Mose Hansen 2004-09-05 13:15:33 UTC]

I still don't get it. emerge app-emacs/xtla won't get you xtla in XEmacs --- and there is plenty of packages that are common between app-emacs and app-xemacs. 

I would still love to see this one committed. 

From IRC I gather that this bug is wrongly assigned in any case :-/

[Comment 6 Mamoru KOMACHI (RETIRED) 2004-09-05 15:06:31 UTC]

Sorry for not reassigning it to xemacs herd.

[Comment 7 Esben Mose Hansen 2004-11-08 10:14:13 UTC]

xtla 0.9 was released recently. I've adjusted the ebuild accordingly.

[Comment 8 Esben Mose Hansen 2004-11-08 10:17:15 UTC]

Created attachment 43535 [details]
Version 0.9 (first official release)

use/ignore.

[Comment 9 Marien Zwart (RETIRED) 2004-12-12 08:29:51 UTC]

Created attachment 45826 [details, diff]
patch from xtla-0.1_p525 to xtla-0.9

There is now a more official 0.9 release. The xtla ebuild already in the tree
can be simplified a bit when you use this one: the configure doesn't need to be
redone as far as I can tell, and the version number is more sane.

[Comment 10 Matteo Settenvini 2005-06-06 23:33:39 UTC]

version 1.0 is out since a while now.

[Comment 11 Matthew Kennedy (RETIRED) 2005-06-07 07:28:58 UTC]

I'm going to update xtla to 1.0 for app-emacs/xtla

[Comment 12 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) 2005-07-21 17:03:03 UTC]

app-emacs/xtla-1.0 in portage, closing.