Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 582736 - net-mail/mailutils-2.99.98-r1 calls functions not in >=net-libs/gnutls-3.4.0
Summary: net-mail/mailutils-2.99.98-r1 calls functions not in >=net-libs/gnutls-3.4.0
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 546150
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Current packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal normal (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo Linux bug wranglers
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks: gnutls-3.5-breakage
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2016-05-11 08:58 UTC by Alex Ford
Modified: 2016-05-12 23:08 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---

Attachments
Failed build log for net-mail/mailutils-2.99.98-r1 (build.log,347.41 KB, text/x-log)
2016-05-11 08:58 UTC, Alex Ford 		Details
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Alex Ford 2016-05-11 08:58:17 UTC 
Created attachment 433942 [details]
Failed build log for net-mail/mailutils-2.99.98-r1

An update to net-libs/gnutls appears to have changed or removed functions, namely gnutls_mac_set_priority, gnutls_protocol_set_priority, gnutls_kx_set_priority, gnutls_cipher_set_priority, and gnutls_compression_set_priority.

This causes net-mail/mailutils to die while compiling libmu_auth.so

build log attached.
Comment 1 Lars Wendler (Polynomial-C) (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2016-05-11 13:04:39 UTC 
Are you sure this issue is limited to gnutls-3.5.x? Can you verify it works with gnutls-3.4.x?
Comment 2 Alex Ford 2016-05-11 15:10:06 UTC 
(In reply to Lars Wendler (Polynomial-C) from comment #1)
> Are you sure this issue is limited to gnutls-3.5.x? Can you verify it works
> with gnutls-3.4.x?

Reproduces with all but identical output for gnutls-3.4.11. How odd.
Comment 3 Lars Wendler (Polynomial-C) (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2016-05-12 23:08:27 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 546150 ***