Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 54972 - can't emerge linux-headers-2.6.6-r1 in amd64
Summary: can't emerge linux-headers-2.6.6-r1 in amd64
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 54949
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: [OLD] Core system (show other bugs)
Hardware: AMD64 Linux
: High normal (vote)
Assignee: x86-kernel@gentoo.org (DEPRECATED)
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2004-06-23 23:29 UTC by Peter Bleszynski
Modified: 2005-07-17 13:06 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Peter Bleszynski 2004-06-23 23:29:03 UTC
i have linux-headers 2.6.6.  i'm trying to emerge emerge linux-headers 2.6.6-r1.  it fails with the error about "linux-headers-2.6.6-tcp_info-DRS-backport.patch!"


Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. emerge linux-headers


Actual Results:  
# emerge linux-headers
Calculating dependencies ...done!
>>> emerge (1 of 1) sys-kernel/linux-headers-2.6.6-r1 to /
>>> md5 src_uri ;-) linux-2.6.6.tar.bz2
>>> Unpacking source...
>>> Unpacking linux-2.6.6.tar.bz2 to /var/tmp/portage/linux-headers-2.6.6-r1/work
Makefile:434: .config: No such file or directory
  CHK     include/linux/version.h
  UPD     include/linux/version.h
>>> version.h compiled successfully.
 * Applying linux-headers-2.6.6-appCompat.patch...                             
                                                                               
               [ ok ]
 * Applying linux-headers-2.6.3-strict-ansi-fix.patch...                       
                                                                               
               [ ok ]
 * Applying linux-headers-2.6.0-sysctl_h-compat.patch...                       
                                                                               
               [ ok ]
 * Applying linux-headers-2.6.0-fb.patch...                                    
                                                                               
               [ ok ]
amd64
 * Applying linux-headers-2.6.4-unistd-nptl-fix.patch...                       
                                                                               
               [ ok ]
 * Applying linux-headers-2.6.6-tcp_info-DRS-backport.patch...

 * Failed Patch: linux-headers-2.6.6-tcp_info-DRS-backport.patch!
 *
 * Include in your bugreport the contents of:
 *
 *  
/var/tmp/portage/linux-headers-2.6.6-r1/temp/linux-headers-2.6.6-tcp_info-DRS-backport.patch-25126.out


!!! ERROR: sys-kernel/linux-headers-2.6.6-r1 failed.
!!! Function epatch, Line 322, Exitcode 0
!!! Failed Patch: linux-headers-2.6.6-tcp_info-DRS-backport.patch!



contents of 
/var/tmp/portage/linux-headers-2.6.6-r1/temp/linux-headers-2.6.6-tcp_info-DRS-backport.patch-25126.out


***** linux-headers-2.6.6-tcp_info-DRS-backport.patch *****

===========================================================

PATCH COMMAND:  patch -p0 -g0 <
/usr/portage/sys-kernel/linux-headers/files/linux-headers-2.6.6-tcp_info-DRS-backport.patch

===========================================================
can't find file to patch at input line 3
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- linux-2.6.6/include/linux/tcp.h    2004-06-22 10:14:17 -07:00
|+++ linux-2.6.7/include/linux/tcp.h    2004-06-22 10:14:17 -07:00
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored
===========================================================

PATCH COMMAND:  patch -p1 -g0 <
/usr/portage/sys-kernel/linux-headers/files/linux-headers-2.6.6-tcp_info-DRS-backport.patch

===========================================================
can't find file to patch at input line 3
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- linux-2.6.6/include/linux/tcp.h    2004-06-22 10:14:17 -07:00
|+++ linux-2.6.7/include/linux/tcp.h    2004-06-22 10:14:17 -07:00
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored
===========================================================

PATCH COMMAND:  patch -p2 -g0 <
/usr/portage/sys-kernel/linux-headers/files/linux-headers-2.6.6-tcp_info-DRS-backport.patch

===========================================================
can't find file to patch at input line 3
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- linux-2.6.6/include/linux/tcp.h    2004-06-22 10:14:17 -07:00
|+++ linux-2.6.7/include/linux/tcp.h    2004-06-22 10:14:17 -07:00
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored
===========================================================

PATCH COMMAND:  patch -p3 -g0 <
/usr/portage/sys-kernel/linux-headers/files/linux-headers-2.6.6-tcp_info-DRS-backport.patch

===========================================================
can't find file to patch at input line 3
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- linux-2.6.6/include/linux/tcp.h    2004-06-22 10:14:17 -07:00
|+++ linux-2.6.7/include/linux/tcp.h    2004-06-22 10:14:17 -07:00
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored
===========================================================

PATCH COMMAND:  patch -p4 -g0 <
/usr/portage/sys-kernel/linux-headers/files/linux-headers-2.6.6-tcp_info-DRS-backport.patch

===========================================================
missing header for unified diff at line 3 of patch
can't find file to patch at input line 3
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- linux-2.6.6/include/linux/tcp.h    2004-06-22 10:14:17 -07:00
|+++ linux-2.6.7/include/linux/tcp.h    2004-06-22 10:14:17 -07:00
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored
Comment 1 Tim Yamin (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2004-06-24 01:27:18 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 54949 ***