Created attachment 382816 [details] net-libs:libgadu-1.12.0:20140813-113931.log And here you see why you should have dropped the relevant keywords from =net-libs/libgadu-1.12.0. Build with protobuf-c : no Build with pthread... : yes Build with zlib...... : yes Enable tests......... : yes Build with glibc..... : yes Build with libcurl... : yes Build with libexpat.. : yes Build with libxml2... : yes Build with perl...... : yes configure complete, now type 'make' >>> Source configured. >>> Compiling source in /dev/shm/portage/net-libs/libgadu-1.12.0/work/libgadu-1.12.0 ... >>> Working in BUILD_DIR: "/dev/shm/portage/net-libs/libgadu-1.12.0/work/libgadu-1.12.0" make -j6 make all-recursive make[1]: Entering directory '/dev/shm/portage/net-libs/libgadu-1.12.0/work/libgadu-1.12.0' Making all in include make[2]: Entering directory '/dev/shm/portage/net-libs/libgadu-1.12.0/work/libgadu-1.12.0/include' make all-am make[3]: Entering directory '/dev/shm/portage/net-libs/libgadu-1.12.0/work/libgadu-1.12.0/include' cd .. ; sh protobufgen.sh protobufgen.sh: line 3: protoc-c: command not found Makefile:585: recipe for target 'packets.pb-c.h' failed make[3]: *** [packets.pb-c.h] Error 255
Aside from the bug (which is there in buildsystem anyway), is hppa actually interested in libgadu?
(In reply to Maciej Mrozowski from comment #1) > Aside from the bug (which is there in buildsystem anyway), is hppa actually > interested in libgadu? This bug is not about HPPA.
