* QA Notice: Missing soname symlink(s): * * usr/lib64/opengl/nvidia/lib/libGLESv2.so.2 -> libGLESv2.so.334.16 * usr/lib32/opengl/nvidia/lib/libGLESv2.so.2 -> libGLESv2.so.334.16 * Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. emerge nvidia-drivers -v 2. 3. Actual Results: usr/lib64/opengl/nvidia/lib/libGLESv2.so.2 doesn't exist usr/lib32/opengl/nvidia/lib/libGLESv2.so.2 doesn't exist Expected Results: usr/lib64/opengl/nvidia/lib/libGLESv2.so.2 should exists, and be symlink to libGLESv2.so.334.16 usr/lib64/opengl/nvidia/lib/libGLESv2.so.2 should exists, and be symlink to libGLESv2.so.334.16
Created attachment 369906 [details] Fixed ebuild Ebuild that fixes bugs #500708 and #500710 (this bug)
Try with -r3.
(In reply to Jeroen Roovers from comment #2) > Try with -r3. Yes, with -r3 should be fine (just synced portage) - that bug is for -r2. But the second bug I reported is also for -r3.
(In reply to Jeroen Roovers from comment #2) > Try with -r3. (In reply to Mariusz Ceier from comment #3) > (In reply to Jeroen Roovers from comment #2) > > Try with -r3. > > Yes, with -r3 should be fine (just synced portage) - that bug is for -r2. > But the second bug I reported is also for -r3. Hmm, looking at ebuild, shouldn't ${PV} in doexe libGLESv2.so.${PV} dosym libGLESv2.so.${PV} ${GL_ROOT}/libGLESv2.so.2 dosym libGLESv2.so.2 ${GL_ROOT}/libGLESv2.so be ${NV_SOVER} ? Won't this fail for FreeBSD/Gentoo ?
(In reply to Mariusz Ceier from comment #4) > Won't this fail for FreeBSD/Gentoo ? I'll be looking forward to the bug report.