Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 50036 - linux-headers/linux-headers-2.6.5.ebuild -needs- to be unmasked for amd64
Summary: linux-headers/linux-headers-2.6.5.ebuild -needs- to be unmasked for amd64
Status: RESOLVED INVALID
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: AMD64 Linux
: High normal (vote)
Assignee: AMD64 Project
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2004-05-04 15:39 UTC by Ryan Earl
Modified: 2004-05-05 00:19 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Ryan Earl 2004-05-04 15:39:53 UTC
This following documents says to ask for "~amd64" to be added to the header of linux-headers/linux-headers-2.6.5.ebuild, but shouldn't it be "amd64"? 
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/base/amd64/technotes.xml?part=1&chap=4#doc_chap1

I would rate this bug above enchancement because the 2.4 kernel has been deprecated in AMD64 according to some documentation.  Therefore it shouldn't default to the 2.4 kernel headers.  gentoo-dev-sources are currently on 2.6.5-r1.  Using 2.4 headers could mess up glibc compilation.

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Comment 1 Travis Tilley (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2004-05-05 00:19:14 UTC
2.4 headers wont mess anything up. however, many apps break when using 2.6 headers. 2.6 headers simply will not be unmasked for any arch at this time.

feel free to submit fixes for sash or any of the other apps that are totally destroyed by 2.6  kernel headers. even so, i doubt you can test and fix every app in portage that breaks... so why upgrade to the 2.6 headers at all if everything works fine already? the 2.4 /kernel/ is deprecated, and for totally unrelated reasons (like devfs being broken, something that has zero effect on using 2.4 headers in userspace applications).