Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 478786 - dev-lang/fpc : does not respect LDFLAGS
Summary: dev-lang/fpc : does not respect LDFLAGS
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Current packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal QA (vote)
Assignee: Amy Liffey
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks: ldflags
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2013-07-30 10:05 UTC by Agostino Sarubbo
Modified: 2016-12-25 19:04 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Agostino Sarubbo gentoo-dev 2013-07-30 10:05:46 UTC 
You receive this bug because this package does not respect my system's LDFLAGS ( -Wl,-O1 -Wl,--as-needed -Wl,--hash-style=gnu )

 * Messages for package dev-lang/fpc-2.6.2:                                                                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                                                                    
 * QA Notice: Files built without respecting LDFLAGS have been detected                                                                                                             
 *  Please include the following list of files in your report:                                                                                                                      
 * /usr/bin/fpdoc
Comment 1 Julian Ospald 2013-07-30 21:20:11 UTC 
This might need more work than it's worth and should not really be a stabilization blocker.

Mind that fpc is a toolchain package and needs special carefulness.
Comment 2 Agostino Sarubbo gentoo-dev 2013-08-02 15:03:29 UTC 
which rule are you following?
Comment 3 Julian Ospald 2013-08-02 15:16:58 UTC 
(In reply to Agostino Sarubbo from comment #2)
> which rule are you following?

the rule that a missing QA_FLAGS_IGNOREDS="foo" is not a reason to block stabilization
Comment 4 Amy Liffey gentoo-dev 2016-12-20 09:52:31 UTC 
How would you like to see this implememented? Converting all LDFLAGS elements to appropriate -k<x> and hope it will work as expected with FPC linkerscript?
Comment 5 Agostino Sarubbo gentoo-dev 2016-12-22 10:20:32 UTC 
If technically is not possible use the LDFLAGS, please add a way to hide the issue.
Comment 6 Amy Liffey gentoo-dev 2016-12-22 10:34:24 UTC 
If it would be technically possible I would not close this bug as invalid.
Comment 7 Agostino Sarubbo gentoo-dev 2016-12-22 10:59:05 UTC 
QA_FLAGS_IGNORED ?
Comment 8 Amy Liffey gentoo-dev 2016-12-25 11:58:45 UTC 
(In reply to Agostino Sarubbo from comment #7)
> QA_FLAGS_IGNORED ?

However I am not able to reproduce it with 2.6.4 or 3.0.0 version.
Can you please confirm that the problem still exist?
Comment 9 Agostino Sarubbo gentoo-dev 2016-12-25 19:01:04 UTC 
It seems to be fine now.
Comment 10 Amy Liffey gentoo-dev 2016-12-25 19:04:00 UTC 
(In reply to Agostino Sarubbo from comment #9)
> It seems to be fine now.

Thank you !