Bug List: (This bug is not in your last search results)   Show last search results      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 41979
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: DUPLICATE of bug 50138
Assigned To: Gentoo Linux bug wranglers <bug-wranglers@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Peter Simons <simons@cryp.to>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
crm114-20040212.ebuild app-text/crm114/crm114-20040212.ebuild text/plain Peter Simons 2004-02-17 18:04 0000 1.49 KB Details
ChangeLog ChangeLog text/plain Peter Simons 2004-02-17 18:07 0000 628 bytes Details
crm114-20040419.diff Update ebuild to crm114-20040419-BlameStPatrick patch John Hampton 2004-04-30 16:41 0000 2.13 KB Details | Diff
crm114-20040419.diff fix for BlameStPatrick patch patch John Hampton 2004-04-30 21:12 0000 338 bytes Details | Diff
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 41979 depends on: Show dependency tree
Bug 41979 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug


Description:   Opened: 2004-02-17 17:59 0000
Attached is an updated ebuild for the latest version of the program. I have
successfully built it on x86, using hardened-gcc and everything. Works fine.

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

------- Comment #1 From Peter Simons 2004-02-17 18:04:17 0000 -------
Created an attachment (id=25814) [details]
app-text/crm114/crm114-20040212.ebuild

------- Comment #2 From Peter Simons 2004-02-17 18:07:36 0000 -------
Created an attachment (id=25815) [details]
ChangeLog

Note that I have edited my e-mail address in the old entry _and_ added a new
entry.

------- Comment #3 From Briz 2004-02-25 07:56:31 0000 -------
procmail should be a dependency, since /usr/share/mailfilter.crm depends on
formail.

Also, suggest making a link called 'crm' to /usr/bin/crm114, since the .crm
files in /usr/share/crm114 reference 'crm' only.

------- Comment #4 From Seemant Kulleen (RETIRED) 2004-03-22 02:29:12 0000 -------
Peter, what do you think of comment #3 then?

------- Comment #5 From Peter Simons 2004-04-05 08:51:17 0000 -------
I'll submit an updated ebuild any time soon. I just want to use the opportunity
to actually test the spam filter software that comes along with crm114, to make
sure everything works. So far, I haven't been using the spam filter, so I
wouldn't know -- the ebuild just install the files into /usr/share/crm114.

Give me a week or two, then I'll have it.

------- Comment #6 From Martin Holzer (RETIRED) 2004-04-22 11:28:41 0000 -------
any news Peter ?

------- Comment #7 From John Hampton 2004-04-30 16:41:27 0000 -------
Created an attachment (id=30416) [details]
Update ebuild to crm114-20040419-BlameStPatrick

I modified the ebuild to build the latest version of crm114 which fixes many
bugs and adds some nice new features like forced learning.  I also use crm114
for spam filtering, so I modified the ebuild to install the mailfilter.cf and
associated *.mfp files to /usr/share/crm114 with the rest of the *.crm files. 
It also creates a symlink from /usr/bin/crm to the /usr/bin/crm114 binary. 
Finally, I added dependencies on procmail, mimencode or mew, and tre (if
dynamically linked).  I have created a tre ebild which I will submit, but if
the "static" use flag is not set, then it will try to emerge tre.  If static is
set, then a staticly compiled crm114 binary is created from the tre sources
packaged with crm114.  I know that there is some talk about splitting the
mailfilter out into another package, but what about a use flag?  Seems to me
that most people use crm114 for spam filtering, and maybe if -spam is set then
it doesn't install the mailfiter stuff.  Ideas?

------- Comment #8 From John Hampton 2004-04-30 21:12:01 0000 -------
Created an attachment (id=30428) [details]
fix for BlameStPatrick patch

Ok, I don't know what I was smoking but there is a patch to my patch.  Fixes a
stupid error with using the emacs use flag.

------- Comment #9 From Martin Holzer (RETIRED) 2004-05-17 03:50:57 0000 -------

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 50138 ***

Bug List: (This bug is not in your last search results)   Show last search results      Search page      Enter new bug