394131 – app-portage/portage-utils-0.6 failed because of missing O_CLOEXEC

Bug 394131 - app-portage/portage-utils-0.6 failed because of missing O_CLOEXEC

Summary: app-portage/portage-utils-0.6 failed because of missing O_CLOEXEC

Status:	RESOLVED FIXED

Alias:	None

Product:	Gentoo/Alt
Classification:	Unclassified
Component:	FreeBSD (show other bugs)
Hardware:	All FreeBSD

Importance:	Normal normal (vote)
Assignee:	Gentoo/BSD Team

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends on:
Blocks:	393163
	Show dependency tree

Reported:	2011-12-09 12:11 UTC by Naohiro Aota
Modified:	2011-12-09 16:55 UTC (History)
CC List:	1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required:	---

Attachments
0001-Add-O_CLOEXEC-fallback-define.patch (0001-Add-O_CLOEXEC-fallback-define.patch,647 bytes, patch) 2011-12-09 12:11 UTC, Naohiro Aota	Details \| Diff
Show Obsolete (1) View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Description Naohiro Aota gentoo-dev

2011-12-09 12:11:59 UTC

Created attachment 295279 [details, diff]
0001-Add-O_CLOEXEC-fallback-define.patch

Failed with:

In file included from libq/libq.c:17:0,
                 from main.c:91:
libq/md5_sha1_sum.c: In function ‘hash_file_at_cb’:
libq/md5_sha1_sum.c:55:38: error: ‘O_CLOEXEC’ undeclared (first use in this function)
libq/md5_sha1_sum.c:55:38: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in

Comment 1 SpanKY gentoo-dev

2011-12-09 16:53:18 UTC

Comment on attachment 295279 [details, diff]
0001-Add-O_CLOEXEC-fallback-define.patch

O_CLOEXEC gets used in a lot more places than this one file

Comment 2 SpanKY gentoo-dev

2011-12-09 16:55:58 UTC

this was easy enough to make work

http://sources.gentoo.org/gentoo-projects/portage-utils/main.h?r1=1.9&r2=1.10