calling chown within portage seems to use "user.group"-syntax, but newer coreutils requires "user:group" (which was about time). :-) Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: emerge the latest coreutils and emerge anything that likes to use chown, vanilla-sources or a webapp will do nicely. Actual Results: nice messages about "invalid user apache.apache" and stuch tidbits, todays ugliest error message of course, since a syntax change just made the '.' available in a username. :-) Expected Results: chown within portage should use the correct syntax, which is also backward compatible. Portage 2.0.49-r15 (default-x86-1.4, gcc-3.3.2, glibc-2.3.2-r8, 2.6.0-test8) ================================================================= System uname: 2.6.0-test8 i686 AMD Athlon(tm) XP 3200+ Gentoo Base System version 1.4.3.11 ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="x86 ~x86" AUTOCLEAN="yes" CFLAGS="-O3 -mcpu=athlon-xp -funroll-loops -pipe" CHOST="i686-pc-linux-gnu" COMPILER="gcc3" CONFIG_PROTECT="/etc /var/qmail/control /usr/kde/2/share/config /usr/kde/3/share/config /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/xkb /usr/kde/3.1/share/config /usr/share/config" CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK="/etc/gconf /etc/env.d" CXXFLAGS="-O3 -mcpu=athlon-xp -funroll-loops -pipe" DISTDIR="/usr/portage/distfiles" FEATURES="sandbox autoaddcvs buildpkg ccache distcc" GENTOO_MIRRORS="ftp://ftp.uninett.no/pub/linux/Gentoo ftp://ftp.rhnet.is/pub/gentoo/ ftp://mirror.pudas.net/gentoo ftp://gentoo.linux.no/pub/gentoo/" MAKEOPTS="-j2" PKGDIR="/usr/portage/packages" PORTAGE_TMPDIR="/var/tmp" PORTDIR="/usr/portage" PORTDIR_OVERLAY="" SYNC="rsync://rsync.gentoo.org/gentoo-portage" USE="x86 oss apm avi crypt cups foomaticdb gif jpeg libg++ mad mikmod mpeg ncurses nls pdflib png quicktime spell truetype xml2 xmms zlib gtkhtml gdbm berkdb slang readline arts aalib bonobo svga mysql sdl gpm tcpd pam libwww ssl perl python esd imlib oggvorbis qt motif opengl ldap cdr mmx sse 3dnow X gtk gtk2 gnome alsa kde encode xv leim gphoto2 dvd pda mozilla mozsvg lirc dvdr"
This is supposed to be fixed, can you give an exact error message ?
This seems to be a duplicate of Bug 31926, Bug 30596 and Bug 23116. I think we should duplicate it to Bug 23116, as this is where the required changes are tracked now. Can somebody with enough Bugzilla-Power duplicate this Bug, please?
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 23116 ***