Bug 325069 – sci-libs/netcdf-4.1.1-r4 please stable

• Status: RESOLVED FIXED
• Product: Gentoo Linux

[Description Justin Lecher (RETIRED) 2010-06-22 14:19:22 UTC]

Please stable

[Comment 1 Justin Lecher (RETIRED) 2010-06-22 14:28:55 UTC]

Test suite included.

[Comment 2 Pacho Ramos 2010-06-24 20:51:22 UTC]

amd64 stable

[Comment 3 Thomas Kahle (RETIRED) 2010-07-01 11:14:45 UTC]

Archtested on x86: Everything fine.

[Comment 4 Christian Faulhammer (RETIRED) 2010-07-09 13:39:45 UTC]

stable x86, thanks Thomas

[Comment 5 Samuli Suominen (RETIRED) 2010-07-09 14:12:46 UTC]

ppc64 stable

[Comment 6 Raúl Porcel (RETIRED) 2010-07-17 18:58:41 UTC]

alpha/ia64/sparc stable

[Comment 7 Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) 2010-07-25 14:25:58 UTC]

Stable for HPPA. Adding PPC.

[Comment 8 Andrey 2010-08-05 08:58:08 UTC]

(In reply to comment #0)
> Please stable

What about adding bug #296174 as a blocker for this stablereq?

[Comment 9 Justin Lecher (RETIRED) 2010-08-05 09:55:31 UTC]

(In reply to comment #8)
> (In reply to comment #0)
> > Please stable
> 
> What about adding bug #296174 as a blocker for this stablereq?
> 

No as long as the ebuild forces -j1. Its not perfect, but doesn't influence the functionality of the package.

[Comment 10 Andrey 2010-08-05 12:03:41 UTC]

(In reply to comment #9)
> (In reply to comment #8)
> > What about adding bug #296174 as a blocker for this stablereq?
> No as long as the ebuild forces -j1. Its not perfect, but doesn't influence the
> functionality of the package.

But the ebuild in the CVS doesn't enforce -j1 [1]:
75	        emake || die "emake failed"


[1] http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/sci-libs/netcdf/netcdf-4.1.1.ebuild?revision=1.7&view=markup

[Comment 11 Kacper Kowalik (Xarthisius) (RETIRED) 2011-02-26 07:38:04 UTC]

OK, Arches we will have another round with netcdf, this time rev4.
Changes include:
 * parallel build fixes
 * various QA
 * proper detecion of fortran

Targets:
=sci-libs/netcdf-4.1.1-r4 ~alpha ~amd64 ~hppa ~ia64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~sparc ~x86

Please do your magic. Thanks!

[Comment 12 Agostino Sarubbo 2011-02-26 14:19:11 UTC]

amd64 ok

[Comment 13 Tobias Klausmann (RETIRED) 2011-02-27 10:28:00 UTC]

Stable on alpha.

[Comment 14 Markos Chandras (RETIRED) 2011-02-27 13:57:04 UTC]

amd64 done. Thanks Agostino

[Comment 15 Michael Weber (RETIRED) 2011-03-01 12:39:03 UTC]

ppc/sparc stable

[Comment 16 Myckel Habets 2011-03-04 06:05:22 UTC]

Builds fine on x86 (including tests), builds rdeps without problems. Don't know how to test further. Please mark stable for x86.

[Comment 17 Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) 2011-03-05 15:52:18 UTC]

Stable for HPPA.

[Comment 18 Thomas Kahle (RETIRED) 2011-03-09 10:07:55 UTC]

x86 done. Thanks Myckel.

[Comment 19 Raúl Porcel (RETIRED) 2011-03-20 11:30:02 UTC]

ia64 stable

[Comment 20 Kacper Kowalik (Xarthisius) (RETIRED) 2011-03-20 18:19:36 UTC]

+  20 Mar 2011; Kacper Kowalik <[e-mail]> -netcdf-4.1.1.ebuild,
+  -netcdf-4.1.1-r3.ebuild, netcdf-4.1.1-r4.ebuild:
+  ppc64 stable wrt #325069. Drop old.