Bug 301034 – dev-db/sqlite-3.6.22 Failed Patch: sqlite-3.6.22-interix-no-estale.patch

• Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 300940
• Product: Gentoo Linux

[Description Davide Pesavento (RETIRED) 2010-01-14 22:19:22 UTC]

>>> Preparing source in /var/tmp/portage/dev-db/sqlite-3.6.22/work/sqlite-3.6.22 ... 
 * Applying sqlite-3.6.22-interix-no-estale.patch ... 

 * Failed Patch: sqlite-3.6.22-interix-no-estale.patch !
 *  ( /usr/portage/dev-db/sqlite/files/sqlite-3.6.22-interix-no-estale.patch )
 *
 * Include in your bugreport the contents of:
 *
 *   /var/tmp/portage/dev-db/sqlite-3.6.22/temp/sqlite-3.6.22-interix-no-estale.patch.out

 * ERROR: dev-db/sqlite-3.6.22 failed:
 *   Failed Patch: sqlite-3.6.22-interix-no-estale.patch!
 *
 * Call stack:
 *     ebuild.sh, line   48:  Called src_prepare
 *   environment, line 3264:  Called epatch '/usr/portage/dev-db/sqlite/files/sqlite-3.6.22-interix-no-estale.patch'
 *   environment, line 1722:  Called die
 * The specific snippet of code:
 *               die "Failed Patch: ${patchname}!";
 *

[Comment 1 Davide Pesavento (RETIRED) 2010-01-14 22:21:56 UTC]

Created attachment 216549 [details]
failed patch output

[Comment 2 Jeremy Olexa (darkside) (RETIRED) 2010-01-14 23:10:56 UTC]

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 300940 ***

[Comment 3 Davide Pesavento (RETIRED) 2010-01-14 23:16:08 UTC]

(In reply to comment #2)
> 
> *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 300940 ***
> 

This isn't a duplicate.

[Comment 4 Davide Pesavento (RETIRED) 2010-01-14 23:18:28 UTC]

Sorry, I didn't see you reopened the other bug.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 300940 ***