maekke: ready for stable in order to nuke built_with_use?
pleas do, thanks.
amd64/arm/x86 stable
Sorry to ask here, but is there a special reason that graphviz depends on gd[-fontconfig]? Till now it seemed to be working with gd with USE=fontconfig. And no changelog or ebuild comment i could find explained about the forced disabled use flag.
Yes, after the stabilization, we have the mess with fontconfig USE flag I think ordinary users will be confused with such uninformative error output: emerge: there are no ebuilds built with USE flags to satisfy ">=media-libs/gd-2.0.28[-fontconfig,jpeg,png]". !!! One of the following packages is required to complete your request: - media-libs/gd-2.0.35 (Change USE: -fontconfig) (dependency required by "media-gfx/graphviz-2.24.0" [ebuild]) (dependency required by "media-gfx/imagemagick-6.5.2.9" [installed]) (dependency required by "gnome-extra/libgsf-1.14.11" [installed]) (dependency required by "gnome-base/librsvg-2.22.3" [installed]) (dependency required by "gnome-base/nautilus-2.24.2-r3" [installed]) (dependency required by "gnome-base/gnome-mount-0.8" [installed]) (dependency required by "gnome-base/gnome-vfs-2.24.1" [installed]) (dependency required by "gnome-base/libgnomeui-2.24.1" [installed]) (dependency required by "gnome-base/eel-2.24.1" [installed]) IMHO the ebuild for 2.24.0 version needs some modification so, what's the reason for >=media-libs/gd-2.0.28[-fontconfig,jpeg,png] ?
(In reply to comment #4) > Yes, after the stabilization, we have the mess with fontconfig USE flag > > I think ordinary users will be confused with such uninformative error output: > > emerge: there are no ebuilds built with USE flags to satisfy > ">=media-libs/gd-2.0.28[-fontconfig,jpeg,png]". > !!! One of the following packages is required to complete your request: > - media-libs/gd-2.0.35 (Change USE: -fontconfig) I don't know how "Change USE: -fontconfig" could be any more clear than that (unless we are talking about handholding here :-)
...end after remerging gd with USE=-fontconfig it still links against fontconfig, which makes the whole fontconfig use-flag-play..... ..... confusing? useless? ???? For me it makes no sense anymore. ren ~ # emerge -pq gd [ebuild R ] media-libs/gd-2.0.35 USE="jpeg png truetype xpm -fontconfig" ren ~ # ldd /usr/lib64/libgd.so.2.0.0 linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x00007fff143ff000) libXpm.so.4 => /usr/lib/libXpm.so.4 (0x00007f300cc18000) libX11.so.6 => /usr/lib/libX11.so.6 (0x00007f300c8dd000) libjpeg.so.7 => /usr/lib/libjpeg.so.7 (0x00007f300c6a4000) libfreetype.so.6 => /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6 (0x00007f300c40d000) libpng12.so.0 => /usr/lib/libpng12.so.0 (0x00007f300c1e6000) libz.so.1 => /lib/libz.so.1 (0x00007f300bfcf000) libm.so.6 => /lib/libm.so.6 (0x00007f300bd4c000) libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x00007f300b9da000) libxcb.so.1 => /usr/lib/libxcb.so.1 (0x00007f300b7bb000) libXau.so.6 => /usr/lib/libXau.so.6 (0x00007f300b5b7000) libXdmcp.so.6 => /usr/lib/libXdmcp.so.6 (0x00007f300b3b1000) libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2 (0x00007f300b1ac000) /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007f300d0a3000)
(In reply to comment #5) > I don't know how "Change USE: -fontconfig" could be any more clear than that > (unless we are talking about handholding here :-) You know what I mean :) global USE -fontconfig in make.conf is not acceptable for many people so they should write the according string in their package.use fike IMHO it's bad practice for a _stable_ package PS. It's only IMHO :)
you havent given any reason as to why the gd[-fontconfig] is there. the question is not "what does it mean", it's "wth does graphviz require gd be built with USE=-fontconfig". if you're working around a bug instead of actually fixing it (bug 267373 ?), then this version shouldnt be going stable
especially considering `emerge graphviz --nodeps` worked on my system with gd built with USE=fontconfig. but perhaps there is a runtime failure (not that i have any way of checking -> no docs as to why this requirement exists).
(In reply to comment #8) > you havent given any reason as to why the gd[-fontconfig] is there. the > question is not "what does it mean", it's "wth does graphviz require gd be > built with USE=-fontconfig". > > if you're working around a bug instead of actually fixing it (bug 267373 ?), > then this version shouldnt be going stable > I second this. Some kind of comment in the ebuild explaining why -fontconfig is necessary would be nice.
looks like I had a look at bug #267373 some time ago (and forgot to remove the change), which is only present in graphviz-2.22*. I apologize for this. Could you guys verify that media-gfx/graphviz-2.24.0-r1 works ok? *graphviz-2.24.0-r1 (15 Sep 2009) 15 Sep 2009; Markus Meier <maekke@gentoo.org> -graphviz-2.24.0.ebuild, +graphviz-2.24.0-r1.ebuild: revision bump, remove false dep on media-libs/gd[-fontconfig], remove broken ebuild
This revision bump appears to have removed the stable keywords for amd64/arm/x86 that were present on 2.24.0, forcing a downgrade.
that was by design. the version wasnt really ready for stable yet. once bug 267373 is resolved (it seems to be already), and the new version doesnt cause any other bugs, we will stabilize the new -r1.
In the future, it'd be nice to have a short note that in the changelog when removing the most recent version of a stable package from the tree. Something like "all stable users are recommended to downgrade to the previous version". Otherwise, those of us with perfectly working graphviz installs are left wondering if someone just made a mistake and whether or not we should be worried about it.
just added a new revision (wrt bug #285750), let's give it a few days before re-requesting stabilization.
(In reply to comment #15) > just added a new revision (wrt bug #285750), let's give it a few days before > re-requesting stabilization. > Time to do this?
arches, please do you magic, thanks.
Stable on alpha.
amd64/x86 stable
arm stable
ppc64 done
ia64/s390/sh/sparc stable
Stable for HPPA and closing.
