This ebuild works good for all my x86 and amd64 systems. Reproducible: Always
Created attachment 184466 [details] ebuild
Reassigning to maintainer-wanted, CCing desktop-misc herd.
Created attachment 205988 [details] version for KDE 4.3
New version is fork, that provides KDE 4.3 look for GTK+ applications, also links the GTK theme with the Oxygen icon set.
Created attachment 205993 [details] repack with removed dolphin's ".directory" files, screenshot, *pdf, *odt and *.colors
this theme is great!!! i can see some minor grey changes but it's ok and it's really stable for me. question: do we really need murrine as deps?
Answer: grep -Ri murr /usr/share/themes/kde43-oxygen-molecule/ /usr/share/themes/kde43-oxygen-molecule/gtk-2.0/gtkrc:style "murrine" /usr/share/themes/kde43-oxygen-molecule/gtk-2.0/gtkrc: engine "murrine" /usr/share/themes/kde43-oxygen-molecule/gtk-2.0/gtkrc:class "GtkRadioMenuItem" style "murrine" /usr/share/themes/kde43-oxygen-molecule/gtk-2.0/gtkrc:class "GtkCheckMenuItem" style "murrine" If you do not want murrine, fix theme.
me dump, i did the grep but with a typo that's why i missed it. would be nice the author to "merge" murrine changes in this theme in order to keep it independent. can you ping the author about this? thx anyhow
Hi :-) I just wanted to let you know that the ebuild worked fine for me. This theme is great for keeping consistent look between QT and GTK apps :-) Together with kcm_gtk, it's also a great replacement for the, now masked, gtk-engines-qt. Thank you for your work! Best regards, Maciek
x11-themes/oxygen-molecule in portage
Fix archive or ebuild, we do not need .directory files in /usr/, odt and pdf is unnecessary too - we know how to install because we use portage. diff /tmp/l1* 2a3,10 > /usr/share/doc > /usr/share/doc/oxygen-molecule-2.1 > /usr/share/doc/oxygen-molecule-2.1/odt > /usr/share/doc/oxygen-molecule-2.1/odt/Oxygen-Molecule 2.1 setup guide.odt > /usr/share/doc/oxygen-molecule-2.1/pdf > /usr/share/doc/oxygen-molecule-2.1/pdf/Oxygen-Molecule 2.1 setup guide.pdf > /usr/share/oxygen-molecule > /usr/share/oxygen-molecule/OxygenMolecule.colors 6a15 > /usr/share/themes/kde43-oxygen-molecule/gtk-2.0/Buttons/.directory 12a22 > /usr/share/themes/kde43-oxygen-molecule/gtk-2.0/Check-Radio/.directory 27a38 > /usr/share/themes/kde43-oxygen-molecule/gtk-2.0/Combo/.directory 34a46 > /usr/share/themes/kde43-oxygen-molecule/gtk-2.0/ListHeaders/.directory 38a51 > /usr/share/themes/kde43-oxygen-molecule/gtk-2.0/Menu-Menubar/.directory 42a56 > /usr/share/themes/kde43-oxygen-molecule/gtk-2.0/Range/.directory 50a65 > /usr/share/themes/kde43-oxygen-molecule/gtk-2.0/Scrollbars/.directory 69a85 > /usr/share/themes/kde43-oxygen-molecule/gtk-2.0/Shadows/.directory 84a101 > /usr/share/themes/kde43-oxygen-molecule/gtk-2.0/Spin/.directory 94a112 > /usr/share/themes/kde43-oxygen-molecule/gtk-2.0/Tabs/.directory 119a138 > /usr/share/themes/kde43-oxygen-molecule/gtk-2.0/Tree/.directory 128a148 > /usr/share/themes/kde43-oxygen-molecule/gtk-2.0/others/.directory 145a166 > /usr/share/themes/kde43-oxygen-molecule/gtk-2.0/panel/.directory
(In reply to comment #11) > Fix archive or ebuild, we do not need .directory files in /usr/, odt and pdf is > unnecessary too - we know how to install because we use portage. Wrong, the .odt/.pdf has instructions howto use the .colors file which wouldn't be clear otherwise.
fixed the .directory issue without revbump, + 31 Dec 2009; Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@gentoo.org> + oxygen-molecule-2.1.ebuild: + Remove empty stray .directory directories.
Hi everyone. I just wanted you to know that I've updated Oxygen-Molecule to version 2.2, and it no longer requires the Murrine engine (among other improvements). You can check it out here: [url]http://www.kde-look.org/content/show.php?content=103741[/url]
fixed url: http://www.kde-look.org/content/show.php?content=103741
Christian, thank you.
that's lovely Samuli can you please bump it? :) (actually the reopen procedure is not really right, we should open a new bug and keep the old fixed)
Created attachment 215482 [details] ebuild, works for me
Created attachment 215483 [details, diff] diff
Bumped. Thanks, but open a new bug next time (doesn't make sense to reference same bug in ChangeLog over and over again) plus this bug is clearly misassigned, it's not a maintainer-wanted package when it's in portage, is it?
