Bug List: (This bug is not in your last search results)   Show last search results      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 26151
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: DUPLICATE of bug 8799
Assigned To: James Boddington <aiken@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Scott Price <prices@dflytech.com>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
avr-libc-20030512.ebuild Ebuild for version 20030512 text/plain Scott Price 2003-08-07 12:58 0000 1.37 KB Details
LICENSE License file text/plain Scott Price 2003-08-07 12:59 0000 3.67 KB Details
avr-libc-20030512.ebuild ebuld for version 20030512 text/plain Scott Price 2003-08-07 13:24 0000 1.37 KB Details
avr-libc-1.0.2.ebuild Avr Libc version 1.0.2 for the Atmel microcontrollers text/plain Brian Korsedal 2003-12-01 09:17 0000 1.36 KB Details
avr-libc-1.0.2-r1.ebuild avr-libc-1.0.2-r1.ebuild application/octet-stream Scott Price 2004-02-06 09:51 0000 1.35 KB Details
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 26151 depends on: Show dependency tree
Bug 26151 blocks: 26146
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug

Description:   Opened: 2003-08-07 12:57 0000 
This is a libc for the Atmel AVR microcontroller.  

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.





***NOTE*** I am not sure how to classify this for the LICENSE variable. 
Different parts of it are under different licenses.  To quote the LICENSE file:

"All of this is supposed to be Free Software, Open Source, DFSG-free,
GPL-compatible, and OK to use in both free and proprietary applications."

I will attach the license file so someone can make the determination.

------- Comment #1 From Scott Price 2003-08-07 12:58:07 0000 ------- 
Created an attachment (id=15702) [details]
Ebuild for version 20030512

------- Comment #2 From Scott Price 2003-08-07 12:59:13 0000 ------- 
Created an attachment (id=15703) [details]
License file

------- Comment #3 From Scott Price 2003-08-07 13:24:21 0000 ------- 
Created an attachment (id=15705) [details]
ebuld for version 20030512

This ebuild puts things in the correct places.

------- Comment #4 From Brian Korsedal 2003-12-01 09:17:22 0000 ------- 
Created an attachment (id=21545) [details]
Avr Libc version 1.0.2 for the Atmel microcontrollers

I don't know if this works or not, I am testing it now.  The older version of
the file does not work.  It tries to download a snapshot that no longer exists.

------- Comment #5 From Scott Price 2003-12-03 17:40:43 0000 ------- 
Thanks, in my current projects I am not using the C compiler, so I have not
gotten around to continued testing of this.  I will download this new ebuild
and try it out.

Any idea how we can get these ebuilds submitted to CVS?  I put mine through the
ebuild lint program that is available and there are no errors.  I just don't
know what else to do.

Thanks!

Scott  =)

------- Comment #6 From Scott Price 2003-12-03 17:56:30 0000 ------- 
Well, so much for trying to test it this evening.  Evidentally the Savanah
systems were hacked, and they are upgrading the hardware and security so I
can't download the tarball.  ;)

I will test it when I can download the tarball.

Also, I think all future ebuilds should be based in the dev-embedded directory.
 It seems logical they should go there.  I will update the GCC and binutils
ebuilds when I get a chance.

Thanks!

Scott  =)

------- Comment #7 From Scott Price 2004-02-06 09:51:16 0000 ------- 
Created an attachment (id=25086) [details]
FTP file location changed.

Savanah.nongnu.org changed the layout of their FTP server.  This new ebuild
changed the download location so that it is correctly retrieved.

------- Comment #8 From Scott Price 2004-02-06 09:53:16 0000 ------- 
So how do we get this ebuild into portage?

Scott  =)

------- Comment #9 From Alexander Gabert (RETIRED) 2004-03-11 00:38:09 0000 ------- 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 8799 ***
Bug List: (This bug is not in your last search results)   Show last search results      Search page      Enter new bug