First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 249663
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Gentoo's Team for Core System packages <base-system@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Björn <mastamind@users.sourceforge.net>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 249663 depends on: Show dependency tree
Bug 249663 blocks: 234907
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug

Description:   Opened: 2008-12-02 22:42 0000 
util-linux falsely depends on sys-libs/e2fsprogs and should instead (or at
least additionally) depend on sys-libs/e2fsprogs-libs for libblkid.

------- Comment #1 From Wormo 2008-12-03 07:37:37 0000 ------- 
Actually it could be an alternative, because libblkid moved out of e2fsprogs
starting in 1.41
|| ( <=sys-fs/e2fsprogs-1.40  
     sys-libs/e2fsprogs-libs )

------- Comment #2 From SpanKY 2008-12-30 04:31:05 0000 ------- 
fixed in cvs

http://sources.gentoo.org/sys-apps/util-linux/util-linux-2.14.1.ebuild?r1=1.12&r2=1.13

------- Comment #3 From Panagiotis Christopoulos 2008-12-30 12:44:46 0000 ------- 
Mike, your change, is in conflict with bug 234907. Before some weeks zmedico
removed e2fsprogs from system set to fix bug 234907. I copy paste the line from
the changelog of profiles/base/packages

Remove sys-fs/e2fsprogs from the system set in order to allow
automatic blocker resolution for bug #234907. This change shouldn't
hurt since the sys-fs/e2fsprogs package is pulled in as a dependency
of sys-apps/util-linux, which is a member of the system set for
relevant profiles.

I see that one way or another, e2fsprogs pull in e2fsprogs-libs, so why we did
that change anyway? I cc dev-portage@ and I hope there isn't a false alarm of
my side.

------- Comment #4 From Panagiotis Christopoulos 2008-12-30 13:26:52 0000 ------- 
I increase severity, cause the change pulls out e2fsprogs from every box, if
someone does today a depclean.

------- Comment #5 From Panagiotis Christopoulos 2008-12-30 20:58:48 0000 ------- 
bah, don't change anything, we probably have solved bug 234907 another
way(writing a revbumped ebuild of e2fsprogs-libs in EAPI=2 where with 2.1.6
portage, blockers get solved automatically). I'll leave the open for a while,
and resolve it as fixed again, in some hours.

------- Comment #6 From David Fletcher 2008-12-31 22:33:05 0000 ------- 
I am the unlucky sap that happened to do emerge --depclean today and not notice
that e2fsprogs was in the list (probably because I didn't know what it was).
I lost fsck and system refused to boot after that. Spent several hours tracking
down what was missing and manually installing e2fsprogs from livecd...

This definitely ought to be fixed.

------- Comment #7 From Zac Medico 2008-12-31 23:01:00 0000 ------- 
Sorry, I guess you happened to sync before it got fixed. It's already been
fixed though:

http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/sys-libs/e2fsprogs-libs/e2fsprogs-libs-1.41.3-r1.ebuild?rev=1.1&view=log#rev1.1
http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/profiles/base/packages?rev=1.44&view=log#rev1.44
First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug