Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 245027 - dev-lang/R-2.8.0 failes to build without X support
Summary: dev-lang/R-2.8.0 failes to build without X support
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Current packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High normal (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo Science Mathematics related packages
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2008-10-31 00:13 UTC by Andrew Savchenko
Modified: 2008-10-31 15:06 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments
Typo fix to allow build without X (R-2.8.0-without-X.patch,262 bytes, patch)
2008-10-31 00:15 UTC, Andrew Savchenko
Details | Diff
ebuild for the patch above (R-2.8.0.ebuild,4.02 KB, text/plain)
2008-10-31 01:33 UTC, Andrew Savchenko
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Andrew Savchenko gentoo-dev 2008-10-31 00:13:48 UTC
dev-lang/R-2.8.0 failes to build without X support due to a typo in the source code. Error message follows:
platform.c: In function ‘do_capabilities’:
platform.c:1661: error: expected ‘,’ or ‘;’ before ‘Rf_checkArityCall’
make[3]: *** [platform.o] Error 1

An attached patch fixes this. Patch is sent upstream.
Comment 1 Andrew Savchenko gentoo-dev 2008-10-31 00:15:09 UTC
Created attachment 170367 [details, diff]
Typo fix to allow build without X

It is sent upstream.
Comment 2 Andrew Savchenko gentoo-dev 2008-10-31 01:33:53 UTC
Created attachment 170371 [details]
ebuild for the patch above

Oops, forgot to add an appropriate ebuild.
Comment 3 Markus Dittrich (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2008-10-31 13:06:58 UTC
Hi Andrew,

Thank you very much for your patch and sending it 
upstream. I've just added this to portage since
the source is indeed broken.

cheers,
Markus
Comment 4 Andrew Savchenko gentoo-dev 2008-10-31 15:06:30 UTC
Hi, Markus

This bug turns out to be already fixed in their SVN after release was done. So I was just blamed out for unneeded report )). Anyway this is fixed now.