Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 222825 - Missing dep for openoffice-2.4 on amd64 : imagemagick
Summary: Missing dep for openoffice-2.4 on amd64 : imagemagick
Status: VERIFIED DUPLICATE of bug 212566
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Current packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: AMD64 Linux
: High normal (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo Linux bug wranglers
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2008-05-19 15:55 UTC by Cédric Jeanneret
Modified: 2008-05-20 08:20 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Cédric Jeanneret 2008-05-19 15:55:14 UTC
Compilation failed on my computer due to missing "imagemagick" dependence.
Here are my use :

cups firefox gtk kde linguas_en linguas_en_GB linguas_en_US linguas_fr opengl

When OOo compiles, it fails to find convert binary, which is provided by imagemagick package.

Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. ensure imagemagick is absent
2. compile OOo


Actual Results:  
Compilation failed : missing "convert" binary

Expected Results:  
should simply compile, install and run

just add imagemagick package in deps for OOo-2.4 amd64.

I DON'T know if there is this problem on other arch !
Comment 1 Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2008-05-19 16:38:52 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 212566 ***
Comment 2 Cédric Jeanneret 2008-05-19 17:21:35 UTC
I don't see why it's a duplicate of the imagemagick bug, which doesn't mention this dependence story......
it is NOT an imagemagick bug.
Comment 3 Carsten Lohrke (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2008-05-19 20:12:41 UTC
(In reply to comment #2)
> I don't see why it's a duplicate of the imagemagick bug, which doesn't mention
> this dependence story......
> it is NOT an imagemagick bug.
> 

Which story? The ebuild does depend on imagemagick. Assuming Jeroen was right with this dupe. Please do only reopen after having a look at the bugs already marked as duplicate there and if so provide your exact error message.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 212566 ***
Comment 4 Cédric Jeanneret 2008-05-20 06:48:32 UTC
(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #2)
> > I don't see why it's a duplicate of the imagemagick bug, which doesn't mention
> > this dependence story......
> > it is NOT an imagemagick bug.
> > 
> 
> Which story? The ebuild does depend on imagemagick. Assuming Jeroen was right
> with this dupe. Please do only reopen after having a look at the bugs already
> marked as duplicate there and if so provide your exact error message.
> 
> *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 212566 ***
> 

it was NOT an imagemagick problem....... but seems to be fixed now, as I removed imagemagick and tried to re-emerge OOo. now it install imagemagick.

but NO, it was NOT a dup of 212566, as 212566 explain a "convert" error, not a failed dependency in another programme !
Comment 5 Jan Kundrát (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2008-05-20 08:20:12 UTC
(In reply to comment #4)
> failed dependency in another programme !

You might want to read the previous comment again, the dependancy on imagemagick *has been present* for a long time.