New ebuild Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce:
Created attachment 12478 [details] ayttm-0.3.1.ebuild
Nice ebuild, but since the description is the first thing the user checks if he wants to know what an ebuild is for, I suggest to add a better description, e.g. "Are You Talking To Me?", an advanced multi-protocol instant messenger client or something like that.
Created attachment 14170 [details] ayttm-0.3.2.ebuild - Version update - Description change Merges nicely.
*** Bug 26609 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
see also bug #26609
Excuse me to disturb anyone, but I would have liked to know the use of the gnome-dependency ? (I didn't initially satisfy it and it emerged properly) thank you for your answer to my newbee's question. julien
It's about this: <snip> gnome? ( >=gnome-base/gnome-libs-1.4.1.7 ) [...] src_compile() { use gnome \ && myconf="${myconf} --with-gnome" \ || myconf="${myconf} --without-gnome" [...] </snip> If gnome is in your use-flags, ayttm will compile with gnome support. (Whatever the gnome support from ayttm is (maybe http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ as the feature page of ayttm indicates?)...) This is the idea of use-flags working here. If you want something, put it in your flags and you get it. If you do not want it, don't put it in there an so support for it will be compiled in any package...
Created attachment 16743 [details] ebuild for the version 0.3.3-1 of ayttm (beware, I didn't satisfy the gnome dependency (?) )
Created attachment 16744 [details] -v 0.3.3 (with gnome support) allright, now I've understood the use of the gnome dependency, I won't annoy anyone.
Created attachment 16746 [details] ayttm-0.4.0.ebuild (sorry)
I have another newbie question (the last one) : you seem to follow ayttm since a few versions now, but the ebuild isn't still available in the portage tree. Why is that so ? cheers, julien
I don't use instant messaging. Please assign to someone who does. Thanks.
I'm using ICQ and MSN, so I'll assign it to myself (It looks CJK is not supported at the moment, unfortunately ;-p)
I only changed ~x86 keywords and committed. Thanks for your contribution.
Hi there, I've just seen ayttm ebuild has been inserted into the portage tree. I just wanted to signal that the digest is incorrect on my box : * net-im/ayttm [ Masked ] Latest version available: 0.4.1 Latest version installed: 0.4.0 Size of downloaded files: [no/bad digest] Homepage: http://ayttm.sourceforge.net Description: Are you talking to me? - MSN, Jabber, IRC, ICQ, AIM, SMTP instant messenger (an "# ebuild ayttm-0.4.1.ebuild digest" sould fixe I suppose) Thanks again to have put that app in the portage tree, julien
I tested ayttm-0.4.1.ebuild with my fresh Gentoo box and it didn't complain about digest. I deleted my digest and run ebuild ayttm-0.4.1.ebuild digest again but got the same file. Can you reproduce the bug with 1) rm -rf /usr/portage/net-im/ayttm 2) put ayttm in your PORTDIR_OVERLAY aside 3) emerge sync 4) ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~x86" emerge ayttm ?
Mamoru, I think you have FEATURES="digest" set the digest is missing from the portage tree. solar@simple ayttm $ pwd /home/solar/cvsd/gentoo/gentoo-x86/net-im/ayttm solar@simple ayttm $ cvs update solar@simple ayttm $ ls CVS ChangeLog Manifest ayttm-0.4.1.ebuild metadata.xml
Absolutely right. I had FEATURES="digest" on all my machines anddidn't notice the bug. I added the digest to CVS. I'm verry sorry for this (especially to Julien).Thanks to all reporting the bug.
