First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 213790
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Portage team <dev-portage@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: mjh <amalsechsplusb@yahoo.com>
Add CC:
CC:
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 213790 depends on: Show dependency tree
Bug 213790 blocks: 216231
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug


Description:   Opened: 2008-03-18 08:32 0000
Emerge -pv output for non-slotted ebuilds does let you compare easily what
version number of an ebuild would get installed and what version number might
already be installed.

Not so for slotted stuff, as you can see in the additional information field:
It is not immediately clear there's jdk 1.5 installed already when you do
emerge -pv jdk

I was told on irc there's "emerge -pvC <virtual>" to get information about
previously filled slots -- but that can't be it, can it?



Reproducible: Always




com ~ # emerge -pv jdk

These are the packages that would be merged, in order:

Calculating dependencies... done!
[ebuild  NS   ] dev-java/sun-jdk-1.6.0.03  USE="-X -alsa -doc -examples -jce
(-nsplugin) -odbc" 60,724 kB 
[ebuild  NS   ] virtual/jdk-1.6.0  0 kB 

Total: 2 packages (2 in new slots), Size of downloads: 60,724 kB

com ~ # emerge -pvC jdk

>>> These are the packages that would be unmerged:

 virtual/jdk
    selected: 1.5.0 
   protected: none 
     omitted: none 

>>> 'Selected' packages are slated for removal.
>>> 'Protected' and 'omitted' packages will not be removed.

------- Comment #1 From SpanKY 2008-03-18 11:43:12 0000 -------
no idea what "sth" means ... going to guess you actually meant "examples"

------- Comment #2 From Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis 2008-03-20 18:06:12 0000 -------
Fixed in r9488 and released in sys-apps/portage-2.2_pre5.

This bug should be RESOLVED FIXED and block bug #210077.

------- Comment #3 From Marius Mauch (RETIRED) 2008-03-20 18:15:12 0000 -------
This is supposed to be fixed in portage-2.2_pre5 or earlier.

------- Comment #4 From Marius Mauch (RETIRED) 2008-03-20 18:15:58 0000 -------
This is supposed to be fixed in portage-2.2_pre5 or earlier.

First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug