201132 – sys-fs/gfs2 (new ebuild)

Bug 201132 - sys-fs/gfs2 (new ebuild)

Summary: sys-fs/gfs2 (new ebuild)

Status:	RESOLVED FIXED

Alias:	None

Product:	Gentoo Linux
Classification:	Unclassified
Component:	New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware:	All Linux

Importance:	High enhancement (vote)
Assignee:	Default Assignee for New Packages

URL:	http://sources.redhat.com/cluster/
Whiteboard:
Keywords:	EBUILD

Depends on:	160847
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree

Reported:	2007-12-03 18:06 UTC by r01
Modified:	2010-09-10 20:28 UTC (History)
CC List:	5 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required:	---

Attachments
gfs2-2.01.00.ebuild (gfs2-2.01.00.ebuild,1.53 KB, text/plain) 2007-12-03 18:07 UTC, r01	Details
gfs2.rc (gfs2.rc,4.22 KB, text/plain) 2007-12-03 18:09 UTC, r01	Details
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Description r01 2007-12-03 18:06:37 UTC

new ebuild for redhat gfs2 cluster project

Comment 1 r01 2007-12-03 18:07:38 UTC

Created attachment 137640 [details]
gfs2-2.01.00.ebuild

/usr/local/portage/sys-fs/gfs2/gfs2-2.01.00.ebuild

Comment 2 r01 2007-12-03 18:09:35 UTC

Created attachment 137641 [details]
gfs2.rc

revamped from gfs.rc of gfs-1.04.00, not too much tested yet.

Comment 3 Alex Moore 2007-12-30 13:37:28 UTC

Thanks for this, although it seems that updated ebuilds are still needed for all the dependencies (cman-2.01.00, ccs-2.01.00, etc) in order to be able to test this properly.

Comment 4 r01 2007-12-31 05:26:19 UTC

(In reply to comment #3)
> Thanks for this, although it seems that updated ebuilds are still needed for
> all the dependencies (cman-2.01.00, ccs-2.01.00, etc) in order to be able to
> test this properly.
Really I don't think it is necessary to split redhat cluster suite to discrete packages as gfs2,cman,ccs,fence,...

A better way to package is to provide a single cluster ebuild of all these, but this need further discussion.

>

Comment 5 Alex Moore 2007-12-31 10:52:33 UTC

(In reply to comment #4)
> Really I don't think it is necessary to split redhat cluster suite to discrete
> packages as gfs2,cman,ccs,fence,...
> 
> A better way to package is to provide a single cluster ebuild of all these, but
> this need further discussion.

Actually, I do agree with you that it would make things simpler if the cluster suite wasn't split up into separate ebuilds. I was just pointing out that the ebuild you provided does still depend on the other separate components - dependencies which can't currently be satisfied - so it won't build. (If I could get it to build I would gladly test it for you though, since I am eager to have GFS2 support on a couple of my machines).

Comment 6 r01 2007-12-31 18:32:00 UTC

please pay attention to #203916

Comment 7 Brian Kroth 2008-01-16 14:16:28 UTC

(In reply to comment #6)
> please pay attention to #203916
> 

bug #184850 has a tar with updated gfs2 ebuilds and all of its dependencies.

Comment 8 Christian Zoffoli (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2008-03-17 23:05:11 UTC

2.02.00 in cvs ...closing