First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 200878
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: DUPLICATE of bug 217039
Assigned To: Desktop Misc. Team <desktop-misc@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Tobias Jakobi <liquid.acid@gmx.net>
Add CC:
CC:
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
emelfm2-0.3.6.ebuild emelfm2-0.3.6.ebuild text/plain Samuli Suominen 2007-12-01 09:11 0000 1.60 KB Details
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 200878 depends on: Show dependency tree
Bug 200878 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug

Description:   Opened: 2007-11-30 21:45 0000 
Hi there,

a new version of emelfm2, the gtk2 port of emelfm, was released in the last
days. Now the current stable version is 0.3.6, the most recent version in
portage is 0.3.5. It would be very nice to get a version bump of this fine (and
lightweight) filemanager.

You can find additional information about the new release in the ChangeLog:
http://emelfm2.net/ChangeLog

This release should also permanently close an emelfm2 bug I posted some time
ago on this bugtracker.

Thanks,
Tobias

------- Comment #1 From Samuli Suominen 2007-12-01 09:11:37 0000 ------- 
Created an attachment (id=137435) [details]
emelfm2-0.3.6.ebuild

Can you try this ebuild? I've changed my hardware to ~amd64 and emelfm2 isn't
keyworded for ~amd64, and when I tried, it segmentation faults.

------- Comment #2 From Tobias Jakobi 2007-12-02 18:21:05 0000 ------- 
I'm currently using this ebuild on an intel 32bit machine (Pentium M) and it
seems to work. At least I didn't get emelfm2 to segfault.
Going to try the ebuild on my 64bit machine in the next week.

Appearently the bug I mentioned before was not completly fixed, so I might want
to talk about it again on the mailing list :-(

------- Comment #3 From Tobias Jakobi 2007-12-06 20:23:40 0000 ------- 
I have succesfully build the application on my 64bit machine, an AMD Athlon64
3500+. emelfm2 starts up and I can do regular work. No crashes.

------- Comment #4 From Tobias Jakobi 2007-12-29 17:30:41 0000 ------- 
Anything new? I'm still using your supplied ebuild and emelfm2 works like a
charm. No major problems so far.

------- Comment #5 From Samuli Suominen 2007-12-30 09:12:52 0000 ------- 
(In reply to comment #4)
> Anything new? I'm still using your supplied ebuild and emelfm2 works like a
> charm. No major problems so far.
> 

I'm hoping someone with ~x86 hardware would add the ebuild, which is why I
assigned this bug to desktop-misc team. 

I can't get it to work on my ~amd64.

------- Comment #6 From Tobias Jakobi 2007-12-30 12:31:55 0000 ------- 
Hmm,

most of the time I'm using my laptop system (with a Celeron-M 32bit CPU) but I
didn't encounter any segfaults when using emelfm2 0.3.6 on my 64bit based
system.

Maybe you can trace the segfault and report this to the developers.

The devs have also posted a patch against 0.3.6 on their website:
http://emelfm2.net/OtherDownLoads?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=e2-0.3.6-07-12-01.patch.bz2

Maybe you need this one to elimate the segfault? I think it's worth a try.
Could be also something to be integrated in 0.3.6-r1 :-)

Going to ask my friend to test this ebuild on his system (another 32bit setup),
so we can at least call this ~x86.

------- Comment #7 From Tobias Jakobi 2008-04-09 17:20:43 0000 ------- 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 217039 ***
First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug