Bug List: (This bug is not in your last search results)   Show last search results      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 197905
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Portage team <dev-portage@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Petteri Räty <betelgeuse@gentoo.org>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 197905 depends on: Show dependency tree
Bug 197905 blocks: 216231
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug


Description:   Opened: 2007-11-02 23:32 0000
* Messages for package net-misc/dhcpcd-3.1.7:

 * This means that we will generate a DUID in /var/lib/dhcpcd/dhcpcd.duid
 * This is generated from a MAC address of the card and a timestamp.
 * It will be used in every subsequent DHCP transaction, along with a IAID
 * in the ClientID option. This is required by RFC 4361.
 * You have installed dhcpcd with DUID support.
 * Some DHCP server implementations require a MAC address only in the
 * ClientID field. These DHCP servers should be updated to be RFC
 * conformant. If you cannot do this, you can revert to the old
 * behaviour by using the -I '' option OR building dhcpcd with the
 * vram USE flag enabled.

See how it comes out of order here.

                ewarn "You have installed dhcpcd with DUID support."
                elog "This means that we will generate a DUID in
/var/lib/dhcpcd/dhcpcd.duid"
                elog "This is generated from a MAC address of the card and a
timestamp."
                elog "It will be used in every subsequent DHCP transaction,
along with a IAID"
                elog "in the ClientID option. This is required by RFC 4361."

For example change the first ewarn to elog. Same problem seems to exist with
the zeroconf message.

------- Comment #1 From Jakub Moc (RETIRED) 2007-11-02 23:47:02 0000 -------
Eh, seriously portage should stop being overly smart. Why's it re-ordering the
messages in the first place?

------- Comment #2 From Zac Medico 2007-11-03 00:32:13 0000 -------
(In reply to comment #1)
> Eh, seriously portage should stop being overly smart. Why's it re-ordering the
> messages in the first place?

It's not trying to be smart. It's actually just a limitation of the way elog is
implemented by using a separate file for each message type.  I suppose it
wouldn't be too difficult to re-implement it in a way that preserves order
across all message types.

------- Comment #3 From Zac Medico 2008-04-13 04:34:50 0000 -------
This is fixed in 2.1.5_rc3.

Bug List: (This bug is not in your last search results)   Show last search results      Search page      Enter new bug