Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 19468 - net-libs/libesmtp net-mail/balsa
Summary: net-libs/libesmtp net-mail/balsa
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Highest critical (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo Security
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2003-04-17 06:04 UTC by Daniel Ahlberg (RETIRED)
Modified: 2003-04-30 09:40 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Daniel Ahlberg (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2003-04-17 06:04:28 UTC
[RHSA-2003:109-03] Updated balsa and mutt packages fix vulnerabilities 
 
From:  
bugzilla@redhat.com 
 
 
To:  
redhat-watch-list@redhat.com, redhat-announce-list@redhat.com 
 
 
CC:  
bugtraq@securityfocus.com, full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com 
 
 
Date:  
2003-04-03 22.34 
 
 
--------------------------------------------------------------------- 
                   Red Hat Security Advisory 
 
Synopsis:          Updated balsa and mutt packages fix vulnerabilities 
Advisory ID:       RHSA-2003:109-03 
Issue date:        2003-04-03 
Updated on:        2003-04-03 
Product:           Red Hat Linux 
Keywords:          balsa mutt IMAP server UTF7 UTF8 
Cross references:   
Obsoletes:          
CVE Names:         CAN-2003-0140 CAN-2002-1090 
--------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 
1. Topic: 
 
New Balsa, Mutt, and libesmtp packages that fix potential buffer overflow 
vulnerabilities are now available. 
 
2. Relevant releases/architectures: 
 
Red Hat Linux 7.2 - i386, ia64 
Red Hat Linux 7.3 - i386 
Red Hat Linux 8.0 - i386 
Red Hat Linux 9 - i386 
 
3. Problem description: 
 
Mutt is a text-mode email client. Balsa is a GNOME email client which 
includes code from Mutt. 
 
A potential buffer overflow in Mutt version 1.4 exists when parsing mailbox 
names returned by an IMAP server. It is possible that a hostile IMAP server 
could cause arbitrary code to be executed by the user running Mutt.  This 
issue affects versions of Mutt provided with Red Hat Linux 8.0 and Red Hat 
Linux 9. 
 
Versions 1.2 and higher of Balsa incorporate the vulnerable Mutt IMAP code 
and are therefore vulnerable to this issue as well.  It is possible that a 
hostile IMAP server could cause arbitrary code to be executed by the user 
running Balsa.  This issue affects Red Hat Linux 7.2, 7.3, 8.0 and 9. 
 
Additionally, a buffer overflow in libesmtp, an SMTP library used by Balsa, 
before version 0.8.11 allows a hostile remote SMTP server to execute 
arbitrary code via a certain response or cause a denial of service via long 
server responses.  This issue only affects versions of libesmtp provided by 
Red Hat Linux 7.2 and 7.3. 
 
Users of Mutt and Balsa are recommended to update to these erratum packages 
containing updated versions of Mutt, Balsa, and libesmtp which are not 
vulnerable to these issues. 
 
4. Solution: 
 
Before applying this update, make sure all previously released errata 
relevant to your system have been applied. 
 
To update all RPMs for your particular architecture, run: 
 
rpm -Fvh [filenames] 
 
where [filenames] is a list of the RPMs you wish to upgrade.  Only those 
RPMs which are currently installed will be updated.  Those RPMs which are 
not installed but included in the list will not be updated.  Note that you 
can also use wildcards (*.rpm) if your current directory *only* contains the 
desired RPMs. 
 
Please note that this update is also available via Red Hat Network.  Many 
people find this an easier way to apply updates.  To use Red Hat Network, 
launch the Red Hat Update Agent with the following command: 
 
up2date 
 
This will start an interactive process that will result in the appropriate 
RPMs being upgraded on your system. 
 
5. Bug IDs fixed (http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla for more info): 
 
66389 - Buffer overflow in versions < 0.8.11 
86394 - Security flaw in mutt discovered by Core Security Technologies 
 
6. RPMs required: 
 
Red Hat Linux 7.2: 
 
SRPMS: 
ftp://updates.redhat.com/7.2/en/os/SRPMS/balsa-1.2.4-7.7.2.src.rpm 
ftp://updates.redhat.com/7.2/en/os/SRPMS/libesmtp-0.8.12-0.7.x.src.rpm 
 
i386: 
ftp://updates.redhat.com/7.2/en/os/i386/balsa-1.2.4-7.7.2.i386.rpm 
ftp://updates.redhat.com/7.2/en/os/i386/libesmtp-0.8.12-0.7.x.i386.rpm 
ftp://updates.redhat.com/7.2/en/os/i386/libesmtp-devel-0.8.12-0.7.x.i386.rpm 
 
ia64: 
ftp://updates.redhat.com/7.2/en/os/ia64/balsa-1.2.4-7.7.2.ia64.rpm 
ftp://updates.redhat.com/7.2/en/os/ia64/libesmtp-0.8.12-0.7.x.ia64.rpm 
ftp://updates.redhat.com/7.2/en/os/ia64/libesmtp-devel-0.8.12-0.7.x.ia64.rpm 
 
Red Hat Linux 7.3: 
 
SRPMS: 
ftp://updates.redhat.com/7.3/en/os/SRPMS/balsa-1.2.4-7.7.3.src.rpm 
ftp://updates.redhat.com/7.3/en/os/SRPMS/libesmtp-0.8.12-0.7.x.src.rpm 
 
i386: 
ftp://updates.redhat.com/7.3/en/os/i386/balsa-1.2.4-7.7.3.i386.rpm 
ftp://updates.redhat.com/7.3/en/os/i386/libesmtp-0.8.12-0.7.x.i386.rpm 
ftp://updates.redhat.com/7.3/en/os/i386/libesmtp-devel-0.8.12-0.7.x.i386.rpm 
 
Red Hat Linux 8.0: 
 
SRPMS: 
ftp://updates.redhat.com/8.0/en/os/SRPMS/mutt-1.4.1-0.8.x.src.rpm 
ftp://updates.redhat.com/8.0/en/os/SRPMS/balsa-1.2.4-8.src.rpm 
 
i386: 
ftp://updates.redhat.com/8.0/en/os/i386/mutt-1.4.1-0.8.x.i386.rpm 
ftp://updates.redhat.com/8.0/en/os/i386/balsa-1.2.4-8.i386.rpm 
 
Red Hat Linux 9: 
 
SRPMS: 
ftp://updates.redhat.com/9/en/os/SRPMS/mutt-1.4.1-1.src.rpm 
ftp://updates.redhat.com/9/en/os/SRPMS/balsa-2.0.6-2.src.rpm 
 
i386: 
ftp://updates.redhat.com/9/en/os/i386/mutt-1.4.1-1.i386.rpm 
ftp://updates.redhat.com/9/en/os/i386/balsa-2.0.6-2.i386.rpm 
 
 
 
7. Verification: 
 
MD5 sum                          Package Name 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
5bab8505c792c1682072f90ec5babe6a 7.2/en/os/SRPMS/balsa-1.2.4-7.7.2.src.rpm 
d5234163353ecf276c872abf253703d9 7.2/en/os/SRPMS/libesmtp-0.8.12-0.7.x.src.rpm 
9a2394f555cc8ea15891e04da2e73030 7.2/en/os/i386/balsa-1.2.4-7.7.2.i386.rpm 
f4d4ae7c3af052f43e1873169ed06036 7.2/en/os/i386/libesmtp-0.8.12-0.7.x.i386.rpm 
08be48e6749eaa9eee9c3c130c8e8bd5 7.2/en/os/i386/libesmtp-devel-0.8.12-0.7.x.i386.rpm 
fb4a47e64ac2a8e35ea98bd64f980eb5 7.2/en/os/ia64/balsa-1.2.4-7.7.2.ia64.rpm 
f5dd08e62f829edf0d1f24a26b7ab364 7.2/en/os/ia64/libesmtp-0.8.12-0.7.x.ia64.rpm 
af33956420acf4c8c1e551850aaec2c8 7.2/en/os/ia64/libesmtp-devel-0.8.12-0.7.x.ia64.rpm 
23c4b1e9fb9e3b9d59329f878b7ddd56 7.3/en/os/SRPMS/balsa-1.2.4-7.7.3.src.rpm 
d5234163353ecf276c872abf253703d9 7.3/en/os/SRPMS/libesmtp-0.8.12-0.7.x.src.rpm 
ef25302d3b208b76d574c1dd32baf160 7.3/en/os/i386/balsa-1.2.4-7.7.3.i386.rpm 
f4d4ae7c3af052f43e1873169ed06036 7.3/en/os/i386/libesmtp-0.8.12-0.7.x.i386.rpm 
08be48e6749eaa9eee9c3c130c8e8bd5 7.3/en/os/i386/libesmtp-devel-0.8.12-0.7.x.i386.rpm 
ee54ef0139d795761ab552085100d57f 8.0/en/os/SRPMS/balsa-1.2.4-8.src.rpm 
db56cb885a976cb82b9493a7bcad0fbc 8.0/en/os/SRPMS/mutt-1.4.1-0.8.x.src.rpm 
6e65eeccc64b858b12e8cdfdf845bae6 8.0/en/os/i386/balsa-1.2.4-8.i386.rpm 
074c0b649d51043349c2ca628fc7d217 8.0/en/os/i386/mutt-1.4.1-0.8.x.i386.rpm 
a10d74ad40852b6dd43fdbcb51fac529 9/en/os/SRPMS/balsa-2.0.6-2.src.rpm 
9e6dc99dcd0adc430995776fedf89712 9/en/os/SRPMS/mutt-1.4.1-1.src.rpm 
26b0deca515d58111780cb510236776a 9/en/os/i386/balsa-2.0.6-2.i386.rpm 
389f755b4702a1acb1a8f891750fe7b2 9/en/os/i386/mutt-1.4.1-1.i386.rpm 
 
 
These packages are GPG signed by Red Hat for security.  Our key is 
available at http://www.redhat.com/solutions/security/news/publickey/ 
 
You can verify each package with the following command: 
     
    rpm --checksig -v <filename> 
 
If you only wish to verify that each package has not been corrupted or 
tampered with, examine only the md5sum with the following command: 
     
    md5sum <filename> 
 
 
8. References: 
 
http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CAN-2003-0140 
http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CAN-2002-1090 
 
9. Contact: 
 
The Red Hat security contact is <security@redhat.com>.  More contact 
details at http://www.redhat.com/solutions/security/news/contact/ 
 
Copyright 2003 Red Hat, Inc. 
 
 
 
_______________________________________________ 
Redhat-watch-list mailing list 
To unsubscribe, visit: https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-watch-list
Comment 1 Daniel Ahlberg (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2003-04-29 05:09:46 UTC
foser: Any objection against unmasking 2.0.10? 
Comment 2 foser (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2003-04-29 05:33:41 UTC
no, did i never mention this to you (?) i knew about this long ago. Thought i CC-ed you.
Comment 3 Daniel Ahlberg (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2003-04-30 09:40:34 UTC
glsa sent