The PAM and PWDB licenses are pretty much the same (only difference is the name of the program). It might or might not be a good idea to use the same file for them.
luke, please go ahead and fix it as you see fit, then.
In fact, taking another look at the licenses, both PAM and PWDB should be equatable to "BSD || GPL"... Anyone wish to confirm this before I change their ebuilds?
PAM and PWDB licenses have been deleted and their corresponding packages now use "BSD | GPL-2" for LICENSE.