First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 172969
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Portage Utilities Team <tools-portage@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Grzegorz Mucha <grzegorz.mucha@gmail.com>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 172969 depends on: Show dependency tree
Bug 172969 blocks: 170220
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug

Description:   Opened: 2007-04-01 06:40 0000 
After changing locations of some programs in sys-apps/coreutils there is a bad
path to /usr/bin/rm in line 57 of /usr/bin/eread:

/usr/bin/rm -f ${FILE}

should be

/bin/rm -f ${FILE}

recent update of app-portage/gentoolkit (0.2.3-r1) does not correct it.

Reproducible: Always

------- Comment #1 From Alec Warner 2007-04-01 07:10:08 0000 ------- 
Fixed eclean and checked other gentoolkit things for problems.

------- Comment #2 From Paul Varner 2007-04-11 05:03:57 0000 ------- 
Released in gentoolkit-0.2.4_pre4

------- Comment #3 From Petteri Räty 2007-05-19 15:49:24 0000 ------- 
(In reply to comment #2)
> Released in gentoolkit-0.2.4_pre4
> 

With sys-apps/coreutils-6.7-r1 stable could this be fixed for stable users too?

Calculating dependencies... done!
[ebuild   R   ] sys-apps/coreutils-6.7-r1  USE="acl nls (-selinux) -static
-xattr" 0 kB
[ebuild   R   ] app-portage/gentoolkit-0.2.3-r1  0 kB

Choice? 1
Delete file? [y/N] y
/usr/bin/eread: line 57: /usr/bin/rm: No such file or directory
Unable to delete app-editors:nano-2.0.4:20070505-230238.log

------- Comment #4 From Jakub Moc (RETIRED) 2007-12-06 23:25:40 0000 ------- 
*** Bug 201539 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #5 From Jakub Moc (RETIRED) 2007-12-26 12:22:23 0000 ------- 
*** Bug 203373 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #6 From Arvid Norlander 2008-03-04 13:16:02 0000 ------- 
Just like to point out that this has still not hit stable, maybe time back port
the fix, or stabilize new version...

------- Comment #7 From Paul Varner 2009-05-06 19:48:09 0000 ------- 
*** Bug 233999 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug