Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 165319 - vanilla-sources-2.6.19.7 - unmask request & mark stable & add to stable tree
Summary: vanilla-sources-2.6.19.7 - unmask request & mark stable & add to stable tree
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 173710
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High normal (vote)
Assignee: Joe Jezak (RETIRED)
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2007-02-04 19:24 UTC by cilly
Modified: 2007-04-07 23:05 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description cilly 2007-02-04 19:24:56 UTC
Running flawlessly:

uptime
 20:24:19 up 46 days, 21:08,  3 users,  load average: 0.05, 0.24, 0.34

I guess it's time to mark it stable.
Comment 1 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-02-04 19:28:34 UTC
Mark stable where? Didn't your your arch even (plus it might make more sense to stabilize 2.6.19.2 instead).
Comment 2 cilly 2007-02-04 19:31:22 UTC
Oh, I mean unmask. Sorry.

So unmasking time, pls.
Comment 3 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-02-04 21:00:10 UTC
Humpf? Where's this masked?
Comment 4 cilly 2007-02-04 21:02:59 UTC
See:

http://packages.gentoo.org/search/?sstring=vanilla-sources

I don't see green spots...
Comment 5 Daniel Drake (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-03-06 18:23:58 UTC
no arch has been specified
Comment 6 cilly 2007-03-06 19:01:39 UTC
Well, I didn't give an arch, intentionally.

See http://packages.gentoo.org/search/?sstring=vanilla-sources for further infos about which arch should mark a more recent kernel as stable, i.e. I don't see any reason why i.e. for the x86 arch the latest stable kernel should be 2.6.17.13. Kernel.org released 18-tree and 19-tree kernels with many bugfixes. In my opinion the above mentioned site gives a wrong impression to the users about which kernels are stable. Well, there is the warning while installing vanilla-source... but then all kernels should be marked as stable or marked as testing.

*just a feedback, not really a bug*
Comment 7 Daniel Drake (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-03-06 19:32:29 UTC
vanilla-sources is unsupported and there is no keywording policy set up there, other than the fact that keywords are deliberately dropped between version changes due to masses of changes every release.

If you have a reason to request a specific version stable on a specific arch we may be able to deal with that, but otherwise please concentrate your keyword managing efforts on supported kernels. Thanks :)
Comment 8 cilly 2007-03-06 19:44:29 UTC
Add to stable tree, please:

2.6.18.6, arch x86

I had an uptime of 69 days with kernel 2.6.18.6, running as gateway, server with QoS including netfilter, iptables and most server apps including bind, apache2, postfix, ntpd, nfs, courier-authlib, mysql, snmp, and others.

(at the moment, I am running 2.6.19.7, so far no problems, will request adding to stable tree if uptime is larger than 40 days)
Comment 9 Christian Faulhammer (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-03-08 07:48:28 UTC
x86 stable and closing.  What about other arches?
Comment 10 cilly 2007-04-06 15:03:39 UTC
Since 03.03.2007, 2.6.19.7 X86 is running stable with: netfilter, iptables, sensors, nfs, postfix, apache, mysql, courier imap, mrtg, named, snmp, tor ...

I guess it's time to add 2.6.19.7 to stable tree for X86.
Comment 11 Christian Faulhammer (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-04-06 15:25:06 UTC
Adding all other arches for a stabilisation and reassigning to maintainers so they keep track.  Maybe vanilla-sources can be cleaned up one day.
Comment 12 Christian Faulhammer (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-04-06 21:05:43 UTC
x86 stable
Comment 13 SpanKY gentoo-dev 2007-04-07 15:01:18 UTC
s390 will remain on 2.6.16.x until IBM says otherwise ...

as for arm, last i tried, 2.6.19/2.6.20 hit some null exception and dont even finish booting :/
Comment 14 Joe Jezak (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-04-07 22:31:55 UTC
Merged with vanilla-sources cleanup bug.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 173710 ***
Comment 15 cilly 2007-04-07 23:05:24 UTC
thanks a lot, hopefully we get this to the right directions