The current hdapsd pkg_config() is looking for the patches as .gz, but they are supplied as .bz2 ... Find the changed ebuild appended...
Created attachment 108601 [details] Changed ebuild
I don't think it should be .bz2 as you suggested because ebuild will unpack hdaps_protect-patches-2.tar.bz2 for you. However, I don't understand why the current ebuild (with *.gz) works fine. May be because gzip just skips it since it's not gzip archive. IMHO, it should be no extention at all. I'm not an expert in this :\
(In reply to comment #2) > I don't think it should be .bz2 as you suggested because ebuild will unpack > hdaps_protect-patches-2.tar.bz2 for you. It is not about the "hdaps_protect-patches-2.tar.bz2", but the single patches itself, which are supplied as "*.patch.bz2". If you run "emerge --config =hdaps-<yourversion>" with the current ebuild, it will say you, that it cannot find the patches, because it is looking for "*.patch.gz". (Just do an "ls /usr/share/doc/hdapsd-<yourversion>/" ;))
that where it comes from! ok, here is my listing: # ls -al /usr/share/doc/hdapsd-20060409-r1/ total 44 drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 232 2006-12-05 23:40 . drwxr-xr-x 461 root root 15928 2007-05-22 04:09 .. -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 6354 2006-12-05 23:40 hdaps_protect-2.6.17.patch.gz -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 6571 2006-12-05 23:40 hdaps_protect-2.6.18.patch.gz -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 6838 2006-12-05 23:40 hdaps_protect-2.6.19.patch.gz -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 226 2006-12-05 23:40 hdaps-Z60m.patch.gz do you have it bz2-ed?..
% ls -al /usr/share/doc/hdapsd-20060409-r1/ insgesamt 48 drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 7. Mai 12:07 . drwxr-xr-x 537 root root 16384 21. Mai 14:06 .. -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 6075 7. Mai 12:07 hdaps_protect-2.6.17.patch.bz2 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 6244 7. Mai 12:07 hdaps_protect-2.6.18.patch.bz2 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 6522 7. Mai 12:07 hdaps_protect-2.6.19.patch.bz2 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 260 7. Mai 12:07 hdaps-Z60m.patch.bz2 Yeah ... hmm ... *astonished* ... strange
Created attachment 120051 [details] Changed hdapsd-20060409-r1.ebuild I had a look inside what dodoc and then ecompress are doing. And ecompress is using the variable "PORTAGE_COMPRESS" to determine, which suffix to use. I made the ebuild to do so too. But: I think it is a wrong way to store these patches inside "/usr/share/doc" - wouldn't "/usr/share" be a better place? - And there they would not be compressed and thus the above hack would be obsolete.
(In reply to comment #6) > But: I think it is a wrong way to store these patches inside "/usr/share/doc" - > wouldn't "/usr/share" be a better place? - And there they would not be > compressed and thus the above hack would be obsolete. Yeah, that's definitely completely wrong location.
Created attachment 133621 [details, diff] hdapsd ebuild now installing to /usr/share Changed the current ebuild (not the one already attached here) to install into /usr/share/${PN} instead of /usr/share/doc. =)
Hi, I've uploaded complete set of ebuils+patches (including tp_smapi with udev rule) to my sectools overlay: http://gentoo.o0o.nu/sectools.xml the latest hdapsd.ebuild (+files) can be find here: http://gentoo.o0o.nu/portage/app-laptop/hdapsd/ Check it out and let me know if any problem
concentrating all work on new hdapsd on one bug. thanks for the report - sorry for the delay. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 166166 ***
