First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 157288
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Gentoo Security <security@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen <jaervosz@gentoo.org>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Flags: Requestee:
 
 
  ()

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
mono-system.web_fix_r68790.patch mono-system.web_fix_r68790.patch patch Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen 2006-12-07 02:45 0000 795 bytes Details | Diff
mono-system.web_security_fix2_r69049.patch mono-system.web_security_fix2_r69049.patch patch Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen 2006-12-07 02:45 0000 737 bytes Details | Diff
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 157288 depends on: 159886 Show dependency tree
Bug 157288 blocks:

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug


Description:   Opened: 2006-12-05 22:15 0000
An attacker can cause source code disclosure using adding %20 (space char)
after the uri, for example

http://www.server.com/app/Default.aspx%20

The Mono project is testing/building packages for the fix.

Credits: 
www.eazel.es

------- Comment #1 From Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen 2006-12-07 02:45:53 0000 -------
Created an attachment (id=103527) [details]
mono-system.web_fix_r68790.patch

Patch from SUSE.

------- Comment #2 From Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen 2006-12-07 02:45:59 0000 -------
Created an attachment (id=103528) [details]
mono-system.web_security_fix2_r69049.patch

Patch from SUSE.

------- Comment #3 From Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen 2006-12-22 01:02:16 0000 -------
Description:
Attackers use source code disclosure attacks to try to obtain the source code
of server-side applications. The basic role of Web servers is to serve files as
requested by clients. Files can be static, such as image and HTML files, or
dynamic, such as ASPX, ASHX, ASCX, ASAX, webservices like ASMX files and any
language supported by Mono like: C#, boo, nemerle, vb files: .cs, .boo, vb, .n,
... When the browser requests a dynamic file, the Web server first executes the
file and then returns the result to the browser. Hence, dynamic files are
actually code executed on the Web server.
Using a source code disclosure attack, an attacker can retrieve the source code
of server-side file. Obtaining the source code of server-side files grants the
attacker deeper knowledge of the logic behind the Web application, how the
application handles requests and their parameters, the structure of the
database, vulnerabilities in the code and source code comments. Having the
source code, and possibly a duplicate application to test on, helps the
attacker to prepare an attack on the application.
An attacker can cause source code disclosure using adding %20 (space char)
after the uri, for example
http://www.server.com/app/Default.aspx%20

Update: is also possible retrieve Web.Config file. This file contains sensible
informatin like credentials. 

------- Comment #4 From Jurek Bartuszek 2006-12-22 15:27:20 0000 -------
I'll take care of that soon. Please update the URL you provided because now it
shows "Page Not Found".

------- Comment #5 From Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen 2006-12-23 04:11:20 0000 -------
Thx Jurek.

The URL works fine here... just checked.

Please comment on the bug once you commit an updated ebuild.

------- Comment #6 From Jurek Bartuszek 2006-12-23 09:26:25 0000 -------
Just noticed: this patch is against dev-lang/mono (System.Web.HttpRequest), not
dev-dotnet/xsp. I'll poke latexer to include the patches ASAP. 

------- Comment #7 From Jurek Bartuszek 2006-12-23 14:50:30 0000 -------
*** Bug 158935 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #8 From Raphael Marichez 2007-01-12 22:45:36 0000 -------
Jurek, Latexer, someone?

------- Comment #9 From Matthias Geerdsen 2007-03-16 15:28:03 0000 -------
dotnet, any news here?

------- Comment #10 From Jurek Bartuszek 2007-04-04 22:28:22 0000 -------
This problem has been fixed in 1.2.2.1 which is already marked stable for some
time.

------- Comment #11 From Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen 2007-04-11 10:44:50 0000 -------
Thx for the update Jurek. Next time please don't close security bugs though :)

First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug