i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -Wall -march=athlon-xp -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer -fforce-addr -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-common -I/usr/include/SDL -D_GNU_SOURCE=1 -D_REENTRANT -Wl,-O1 -Wl,--sort-common -o .libs/mpeg2dec mpeg2dec.o dump_state.o getopt.o gettimeofday.o ../libvo/libvo.a /usr/lib/libSM.so /usr/lib/libICE.so /usr/lib/libXv.so /usr/lib/libXext.so /usr/lib/libSDL.so -lm -L/usr/lib /usr/lib/libcaca.so /usr/lib/libX11.so /usr/lib/libXau.so /usr/lib/libXdmcp.so -ldl -lncurses -lpthread ../libmpeg2/.libs/libmpeg2.so ../libmpeg2/convert/.libs/libmpeg2convert.so /usr/lib/libSDL.so: undefined reference to `caca_create_bitmap' /usr/lib/libSDL.so: undefined reference to `caca_init' /usr/lib/libSDL.so: undefined reference to `caca_get_width' /usr/lib/libSDL.so: undefined reference to `caca_refresh' /usr/lib/libSDL.so: undefined reference to `caca_end' /usr/lib/libSDL.so: undefined reference to `caca_draw_bitmap' /usr/lib/libSDL.so: undefined reference to `caca_get_height' /usr/lib/libSDL.so: undefined reference to `caca_free_bitmap' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[1]: *** [mpeg2dec] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/media-libs/libmpeg2-0.4.1/work/mpeg2dec-0.4.1/src' make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 !!! ERROR: media-libs/libmpeg2-0.4.1 failed. [ebuild R ] media-libs/libcaca-0.99_beta7 USE="X -doc imlib ncurses -nocxx opengl -slang" 0 kB [ebuild R ] media-libs/libsdl-1.2.11-r1 USE="X -aalib alsa -arts dga -directfb -esd fbcon -ggi libcaca -nas -noaudio -noflagstrip -nojoystick -novideo opengl oss -svga xinerama xv" 0 kB [ebuild R ] media-libs/libmpeg2-0.4.1 USE="X sdl" 0 kB Re-emerging libsdl fixed this; can you add some note to the libcaca ebuild? (revdep-rebuild doesn't find anything). Thanks.
*** Bug 155259 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 155426 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Rebuilding libsdl does solve this issue, so the real question here is "why revdep-rebuild" doesn't catch it.
(In reply to comment #3) > Rebuilding libsdl does solve this issue, so the real question here is "why > revdep-rebuild" doesn't catch it. > so ... maybe you shoudl make this bug dup of bug 79606 or block Bug 98715 ?
(In reply to comment #4) > so ... maybe you shoudl make this bug dup of bug 79606 ???
(In reply to comment #5) > ??? > You are right Jakub; something like bug 96946 or bug 80455 would be more apropriate; 79606 was not the one I was looking for; 96946 is quiet better.
*** Bug 162176 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Actually, the open revdep-rebuild bug is 63643. However, now that I know a potential solution, I will work on fixing it.
*** Bug 163450 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 163564 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 164330 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 165252 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 165886 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
how can this help me?! "recompiling libsdl..." i can not compile it, no matter how often i try! (In reply to comment #13) > *** Bug 165886 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** >
(In reply to comment #14) > how can this help me?! "recompiling libsdl..." > i can not compile it, no matter how often i try! media-libs/sdl-net != media-libs/libsdl last time I've checked... :P
(In reply to comment #15) > (In reply to comment #14) > > how can this help me?! "recompiling libsdl..." > > i can not compile it, no matter how often i try! > > media-libs/sdl-net != media-libs/libsdl last time I've checked... :P > NARFFF!!! thx :)
*** Bug 167288 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
that website for the bug is http://bugzilla.libsdl.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393
(In reply to comment #18) > that website for the bug is http://bugzilla.libsdl.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393 > sorry wrong bug, I hate that when I post to a bug, it moves me to the next bug.
*** Bug 168868 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 157947 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 170995 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 162589 ***
