Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 153308 - stabilize net-news/blam-1.8.4_pre2 for mozilla removal
Summary: stabilize net-news/blam-1.8.4_pre2 for mozilla removal
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High major (vote)
Assignee: AMD64 Project
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on: 98839 159634 161093
Blocks: 137665
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2006-10-29 08:46 UTC by Peter Johanson (RETIRED)
Modified: 2007-01-27 03:01 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Peter Johanson (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-10-29 08:46:29 UTC
blam-1.8.2 has been in the tree nearly a year now. Last night I commited one last fix for issues with mono-1.1.17 and higher, but otherwise this has had almost no bugs. I need this stabalized as part of my work to rid gecko-sharp of the mozilla dependancy (see bug #137665).

Thanks in advance arch teams.
Comment 1 Markus Meier gentoo-dev 2006-10-29 13:28:13 UTC
looks like gecko-sharp-0.11-r1 needs to go stable first if you don't want mozilla.

# emerge -ptv =blam-1.8.2-r2
[ebuild  N    ] net-news/blam-1.8.2-r2  583 kB
[ebuild  N    ]  dev-dotnet/gecko-sharp-0.6  108 kB
[ebuild  N    ]   www-client/mozilla-1.7.13  USE="crypt gnome ipv6 java ldap ssl truetype xprint -debug -mozcalendar -mozdevelop -moznocompose -moznoirc -moznomail -moznoxft -mozsvg -postgres -xinerama" 29,912 kB
[ebuild  NS   ]  dev-dotnet/gconf-sharp-1.0.10  0 kB
[ebuild  NS   ]   dev-dotnet/gnome-sharp-1.0.10  0 kB
[ebuild  NS   ]   dev-dotnet/art-sharp-1.0.10  0 kB
[ebuild  NS   ]   dev-dotnet/glade-sharp-1.0.10  0 kB
[ebuild  NS   ]   dev-dotnet/gtk-sharp-1.0.10  0 kB
Comment 2 nixnut (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-10-31 10:16:05 UTC
Stable on ppc
Comment 3 Steve Dibb (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-10-31 19:02:02 UTC
amd64 stable
Comment 4 Christian Faulhammer (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-11-03 13:07:53 UTC
(In reply to comment #1)
> looks like gecko-sharp-0.11-r1 needs to go stable first if you don't want
> mozilla.

 That has been added on 29th October 2006, so I won't stable it right away.  I come again on 29th of November to stable both together.
Comment 5 Christian Faulhammer (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-11-28 06:26:02 UTC
(In reply to comment #4)
> (In reply to comment #1)
> > looks like gecko-sharp-0.11-r1 needs to go stable first if you don't want
> > mozilla.
> 
>  That has been added on 29th October 2006, so I won't stable it right away.  I
> come again on 29th of November to stable both together.

 blam harddepends on gecko-sharp-0.6 (and that is needed).  So it will always pull in mozilla, if it is not fixed in the ebuild. Stable on x86

Comment 6 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-12-05 23:35:31 UTC
(In reply to comment #5)
>  blam harddepends on gecko-sharp-0.6 (and that is needed).  So it will always
> pull in mozilla, if it is not fixed in the ebuild. Stable on x86

Reopen, this doesn't solve the mozilla removal issue in any way... 

Comment 7 Peter Johanson (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-12-05 23:41:39 UTC
Yeah, totally my bad, I'd forgotten blam was still so far in the dark ages and was actually using the old gtk# 1.0.x stuff. Someone else has taken up blam development, found at (http://www.cmartin.tk/blam.html), which among other things finally updates to the new gecko-sharp/gtk-sharp. I will try to find time this week to bump, which should resolve this dep issue.
Comment 8 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-01-01 12:00:37 UTC
Fixed in 1.8.4_pre2; needs to be stabilized.
Comment 9 Peter Johanson (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-01-02 09:39:22 UTC
Re-adding the arch teams, please stabalise the new 1.8.4_pre2 for us, so the mozilla herd can stop harassing me. (:
Comment 10 Andrej Kacian (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-01-02 14:12:14 UTC
!!! All ebuilds that could satisfy ">=dev-dotnet/glade-sharp-2.8.2" have been masked.
!!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your request:
- dev-dotnet/glade-sharp-2.8.2 (masked by: ~x86 keyword)
- dev-dotnet/glade-sharp-2.10.0 (masked by: ~x86 keyword)

Which one do you want stabilized for blam?
Comment 11 Christian Faulhammer (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-01-08 11:23:51 UTC
checking for BLAM... configure: error: Package requirements (gtk-sharp-2.0 >= 2.8.2
                  gecko-sharp-2.0 >= 0.11
                  gconf-sharp-2.0 >= 2.8.2
                  glade-sharp-2.0 >= 2.8.2) were not met:

Requested 'gconf-sharp-2.0 >= 2.8.2' but version of GConf is 2.8.0

So please add it.
Comment 12 Jory A. Pratt 2007-01-14 01:02:37 UTC
(In reply to comment #10)
> !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy ">=dev-dotnet/glade-sharp-2.8.2" have been
> masked.
> !!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your request:
> - dev-dotnet/glade-sharp-2.8.2 (masked by: ~x86 keyword)
> - dev-dotnet/glade-sharp-2.10.0 (masked by: ~x86 keyword)
> 
> Which one do you want stabilized for blam?
> 

Go ahead with 2.8.2 which amd64 has already done so themselves.
Comment 13 Olivier Crete (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-01-14 02:53:22 UTC
when I run blam 1.8.4_pre2, the theme images do not show up for themes blam and pimped, but they do appear in the planet theme.. The only difference I can find is that the planet theme loads the images using css while the 2 others have them in the html file. Do you want to stabilize anyways (for amd64) ?
Comment 14 Olivier Crete (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-01-14 03:17:04 UTC
ok, the image bug is an upstream bug.. 
They set <base href="${url}" /> ... but that means that all files loaded from the html will be relative to that URL... so the images dont get loaded.. quick fix is to have an absolute path (with file:///) or load the images using CSS. Anyways, I've emailed upstream.

Also blam 1.8.4 is out if you care. 
Comment 15 Christian Faulhammer (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-01-18 12:14:29 UTC
I adjusted the dependency of gconf-sharp to 2.8.2, as dotnet team did not react to my request.  x86 stable
Comment 16 nixnut (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-01-23 20:50:33 UTC
Stable on ppc
Comment 17 Olivier Crete (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-01-27 03:01:59 UTC
well.. amd64 stable..