First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 151635
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Gentoo Security <security@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Vinícius Dias dos Santos <vininim@gmail.com>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Flags: Requestee:
 
 
  ()

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
emerge.info emerge --info text/plain Tobias Heinlein 2006-10-20 08:27 0000 3.18 KB Details
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 151635 depends on: Show dependency tree
Bug 151635 blocks:

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug


Description:   Opened: 2006-10-16 14:00 0000
Already disclosured to the public, it's described here:
http://www.rapid7.com/advisories/R7-0025.jsp

------- Comment #1 From Raphael Marichez 2006-10-16 14:09:23 0000 -------
Thanks
(to be confirmed)

------- Comment #2 From Chris Gianelloni (RETIRED) 2006-10-16 15:09:47 0000 -------
It looks like the problems are fixed in the 962* drivers, but those are beta ad
are not 100% stable yet.  Waiting for an official patch/release to resolve this
from UPSTREAM.

------- Comment #3 From Raphael Marichez 2006-10-16 15:38:46 0000 -------
OK, i let this bug in [upstream] status.

------- Comment #4 From Chris Gianelloni (RETIRED) 2006-10-17 06:11:30 0000 -------
http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=78322

So what's the best course of action here?

http://download.nvidia.com/XFree86/Linux-x86/1.0-7184/README/readme.txt

The 7184 nvidia-legacy-drivers are *not* vulnerable *by default* but someone
could manually enable RenderAccel.  The 8774 nvidia-drivers *are* vulnerable,
but there is a workaround, since I do not feel comfortable asking for beta
drivers to be marked stable.

------- Comment #5 From Andy Botting 2006-10-17 16:26:44 0000 -------
Shouldn't an entry of the GLSA be done already for this?

------- Comment #6 From William Blew 2006-10-17 22:56:08 0000 -------
(In reply to comment #0)
> Already disclosured to the public, it's described here:
> http://www.rapid7.com/advisories/R7-0025.jsp

There is an nVidia response for the 8*** drivers here:
http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=78322

Its reproduced below:
>Disabling RenderAccel:
>Option "RenderAccel" "False"
>will serve as a workaround for those who are not comfortable with running a >1.0-962x driver.

>As noted above, both 1.0-9625 & 1.0-9626 already have this vulnerability fixed.

>Thanks,
>Lonni

------- Comment #7 From Marijn Schouten 2006-10-18 04:14:46 0000 -------
this option is to be put in the Device section(s) I gather.

------- Comment #8 From Chris Gianelloni (RETIRED) 2006-10-18 15:10:48 0000 -------
Yes.

------- Comment #9 From Vinícius Dias dos Santos 2006-10-19 10:04:59 0000 -------
They released a driver with a fix for the issue in:
http://www.nvidia.com/object/unix.html

I sugest to mask the vunerable drivers as soon as an ebuild for the new release
is
working.

------- Comment #10 From Chris Gianelloni (RETIRED) 2006-10-20 06:15:38 0000 -------
OK, 1.0.8776 is now in the tree.  This solves the problem for nvidia-drivers. 
If nvidia-legacy-drivers is vulnerable, it isn't vulnerable in the default
configuration, and RenderAccel isn't stable in those drivers.

Please mark nvidia-drivers-1.0.8776 stable on amd64/x86.

------- Comment #11 From Tobias Heinlein 2006-10-20 08:27:06 0000 -------
Created an attachment (id=100092) [details]
emerge --info

------- Comment #12 From Tobias Heinlein 2006-10-20 08:29:00 0000 -------
- nvidia-drivers-1.0.8776 emerges fine on amd64
- passes collision-test
- passes multilib-strict
- works fine for me


'emerge --info' see attachment.

------- Comment #13 From Patrice Bouvard 2006-10-21 15:17:33 0000 -------
(In reply to comment #5)
> Shouldn't an entry of the GLSA be done already for this?
> 

I agree, the GLSA is still missing.

------- Comment #14 From Christian Faulhammer 2006-10-21 23:32:25 0000 -------
(In reply to comment #13)
> (In reply to comment #5)
> > Shouldn't an entry of the GLSA be done already for this?
> > 
> 
> I agree, the GLSA is still missing.


 Because x86 still needs to go stable.  I have no hardware to test the driver,
so ping to x86 team.

------- Comment #15 From Markus Meier 2006-10-22 05:41:37 0000 -------
1. emerges on x86
2. passes collision test
3. works

Portage 2.1.1 (default-linux/x86/2006.1/desktop, gcc-4.1.1, glibc-2.4-r3,
2.6.17.13 i686)
=================================================================
System uname: 2.6.17.13 i686 AMD Athlon(TM) XP1800+
Gentoo Base System version 1.12.5
Last Sync: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 09:50:01 +0000
ccache version 2.3 [enabled]
app-admin/eselect-compiler: [Not Present]
dev-java/java-config: 1.3.7, 2.0.30
dev-lang/python:     2.3.5-r3, 2.4.3-r4
dev-python/pycrypto: 2.0.1-r5
dev-util/ccache:     2.3
dev-util/confcache:  [Not Present]
sys-apps/sandbox:    1.2.17
sys-devel/autoconf:  2.13, 2.59-r7
sys-devel/automake:  1.4_p6, 1.5, 1.6.3, 1.7.9-r1, 1.8.5-r3, 1.9.6-r2
sys-devel/binutils:  2.16.1-r3
sys-devel/gcc-config: 1.3.13-r4
sys-devel/libtool:   1.5.22
virtual/os-headers:  2.6.17-r1
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="x86"
AUTOCLEAN="yes"
CBUILD="i686-pc-linux-gnu"
CFLAGS="-O2 -march=i686 -fomit-frame-pointer -pipe"
CHOST="i686-pc-linux-gnu"
CONFIG_PROTECT="/etc /usr/kde/3.5/env /usr/kde/3.5/share/config
/usr/kde/3.5/shutdown /usr/share/X11/xkb /usr/share/config
/usr/share/texmf/dvipdfm/config/ /usr/share/texmf/dvips/config/
/usr/share/texmf/tex/generic/config/ /usr/share/texmf/tex/platex/config/
/usr/share/texmf/xdvi/"
CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK="/etc/env.d /etc/env.d/java/ /etc/gconf
/etc/java-config/vms/ /etc/revdep-rebuild /etc/terminfo"
CXXFLAGS="-O2 -march=i686 -fomit-frame-pointer -pipe"
DISTDIR="/usr/portage/distfiles"
EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS="--nospinner"
FEATURES="autoconfig ccache collision-protect distlocks fixpackages
metadata-transfer parallel-fetch sandbox sfperms strict test userfetch userpriv
usersandbox"
GENTOO_MIRRORS="http://mirror.switch.ch/mirror/gentoo/ http://gentoo.inode.at/"
LANG="en_GB.utf8"
LINGUAS="en de en_GB"
PKGDIR="/usr/portage/packages"
PORTAGE_RSYNC_OPTS="--recursive --links --safe-links --perms --times --compress
--force --whole-file --delete --delete-after --stats --timeout=180
--exclude='/distfiles' --exclude='/local' --exclude='/packages'"
PORTAGE_TMPDIR="/var/tmp"
PORTDIR="/usr/portage"
PORTDIR_OVERLAY="/usr/local/portage/normal"
SYNC="rsync://192.168.2.1/gentoo-portage"
USE="x86 3dnow 3dnowext X a52 aac acpi alsa apache2 bash-completion berkdb
bitmap-fonts bzip2 cairo cdr cli cracklib crypt css cups dbus divx4linux
dlloader dri dts dvd dvdr dvdread elibc_glibc emboss exif fam ffmpeg firefox
font-server fortran gdbm gif gnome gphoto2 gpm gstreamer gtk gtk2 gtkhtml hal
input_devices_keyboard input_devices_mouse ipv6 isdnlog java jpeg kde
kernel_linux ldap libclamav libg++ linguas_de linguas_en linguas_en_GB
logitech-mouse mad mikmod mmx mmxext mono mozcalendar mozdevelop mozsvg mp3
mpeg ncurses network nls nptl nptlonly nvidia oav ogg opengl oss pam pcre perl
png ppds pppd python qt qt3 qt4 quicktime readline reflection samba sdl
seamonkey session spell spl ssl tcltk tcpd test tetex tiff truetype
truetype-fonts type1-fonts udev unicode usb userland_GNU vcd video_cards_none
video_cards_nv vorbis win32codecs xine xinerama xml xorg xorg-x11 xprint xv xvg
xvid zlib"
Unset:  CTARGET, INSTALL_MASK, LC_ALL, LDFLAGS, MAKEOPTS,
PORTAGE_RSYNC_EXTRA_OPTS

------- Comment #16 From Jakub Moc (RETIRED) 2006-10-22 11:13:38 0000 -------
*** Bug 152330 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #17 From Joshua Jackson 2006-10-23 19:30:50 0000 -------
x86 stable ^.^

------- Comment #18 From Simon Stelling (RETIRED) 2006-10-24 02:09:32 0000 -------
amd64 stable too, have fun with the glsa

------- Comment #19 From Raphael Marichez 2006-11-07 08:36:41 0000 -------
Comment Required
You have to specify a comment on this change. Please explain your change.

Please press Back and try again. 

------- Comment #20 From Raphael Marichez 2006-11-07 14:46:39 0000 -------
GLSA 200611-03

Thanks to everybody, sorry for the delay.

First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug