Bug List: (This bug is not in your last search results)   Show last search results      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 136721
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Gentoo Security <security@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Peter Kosinar <goober@2neg.ksp.sk>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Flags: Requestee:
 
 
  ()

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 136721 depends on: Show dependency tree
Bug 136721 blocks:

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug


Description:   Opened: 2006-06-13 16:51 0000
Shoutcast server 1.9.5 allows any remote attacker who can reach the server's
port to read arbitrary files on the machine. Sample request can be obtained
using the following command:

echo -e "GET /content/%2E./.%2E/%2E%2E/etc/shadow%00.mp3\n"

which, when piped through netcat to the listening Shoutcast server, should show
the contents of /etc/shadow file. The complete advisory (written for a
different target audience, though; so it contains some uninteresting details)
can be found at http://people.ksp.sk/~goober/advisory/001-shoutcast.html

The vendor (Nullsoft) has NOT been contacted yet, for I failed to find any
security contact and didn't feel very much like posting this information to
their public forums.

------- Comment #1 From Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen 2006-06-14 02:56:02 0000 -------
Jeremy you touched this one before Chris White. Could you please advise?

@Peter is link public?

------- Comment #2 From Peter Kosinar 2006-06-14 04:09:23 0000 -------
No, the link is not public and will not become public until the vulnerability
is resolved.

------- Comment #3 From Jeremy Huddleston (RETIRED) 2006-06-16 12:57:01 0000 -------
Well, this is a binary package.  We can't do anything until upstream releases a
new version.  The workarounds are valid, but we can't really force that on
users as I'm sure many won't want to not run it in a chroot jail.

As for executing as a unpriv user, that's a good idea in general, and I don't
see why that wasn't the case already.

We need to notify upstream.  I'd look for personal contact info for the
developers.  Additionally, I believe NullSoft is still owned by AOL, so you
might be able to contact AOL's security team for the contact information.

------- Comment #4 From Peter Kosinar 2006-06-22 15:32:25 0000 -------
The upstream released a new version for Linux today. Preliminary tests show
that the original vulnerability is no longer present, but the changes
introduced a new, very similar one. Thus, the actual version (1.9.6) is NOT
safe yet.

------- Comment #5 From Stefan Cornelius (RETIRED) 2006-06-22 15:42:20 0000 -------
Peter, is upstream informed that it's still flawed?

------- Comment #6 From Peter Kosinar 2006-06-22 15:57:47 0000 -------
Yes, the vendor has been notified a few minutes ago.

------- Comment #7 From Peter Kosinar 2006-06-23 13:00:33 0000 -------
Okay, upstream released 1.9.7 today, vulnerabilities (original one + the new
ones caused by the first fix) are apparently fixed.

------- Comment #8 From Stefan Cornelius (RETIRED) 2006-06-24 07:34:19 0000 -------
eradicator, please bump. Shoutcast mentioned the security issues on their
homepage and their board, so this is public. Peter, may we open this bug to the
public, too?

------- Comment #9 From Peter Kosinar 2006-06-24 07:48:53 0000 -------
As the fixed version is available, I see no problems with opening it.

------- Comment #10 From Jeremy Huddleston (RETIRED) 2006-06-24 22:26:25 0000 -------
I am on vacation in Hawaii and don't have access to my box to test the new
software.

------- Comment #11 From Jeremy Huddleston (RETIRED) 2006-06-24 22:42:41 0000 -------
I am on vacation in Hawaii and don't have access to my box to test the new
software.

sound: Can someone please bump this and test it?

------- Comment #12 From Stefan Cornelius (RETIRED) 2006-06-25 06:49:45 0000 -------
amd64 and x86 please test and mark stable, but beware: i haven't slept for 30h

------- Comment #13 From Raúl Porcel 2006-06-28 13:48:27 0000 -------
Tested in x86 and works pretty fine, i'm listening right now my music.
Should be marked as stable.

------- Comment #14 From Chris Gianelloni (RETIRED) 2006-06-29 12:26:44 0000 -------
Stable on amd64/x86... thanks for testing...

------- Comment #15 From Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen 2006-06-30 08:47:09 0000 -------
This one is ready for GLSA decision.

------- Comment #16 From Stefan Cornelius (RETIRED) 2006-06-30 08:55:20 0000 -------
mhh, weak yes, but i wouldn't mind a no

------- Comment #17 From Stefan Cornelius (RETIRED) 2006-06-30 08:55:46 0000 -------
mhh, weak yes, but i wouldn't mind a no

------- Comment #18 From Wolf Giesen (RETIRED) 2006-06-30 09:17:56 0000 -------
Kinda silly, but YES.

------- Comment #19 From Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen 2006-06-30 09:19:26 0000 -------
Voting yes, so let's have a GLSA more.

------- Comment #20 From Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen 2006-07-09 10:37:19 0000 -------
GLSA 200607-05

Bug List: (This bug is not in your last search results)   Show last search results      Search page      Enter new bug