Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 130529 - lvm2 2.02.05.ebuild stabilization bug
Summary: lvm2 2.02.05.ebuild stabilization bug
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Other
: High major (vote)
Assignee: IA-64 team
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2006-04-19 15:06 UTC by Eric Edgar (RETIRED)
Modified: 2006-09-07 09:43 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Eric Edgar (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-04-19 15:06:52 UTC
I know this has only been in the tree for a short period of time.  However, this package has been stable upstream for quite some time and it is needed to resolve a device-mapper upgrade downgrade circular dependancy issue.  I have masked the clvm,cman,gulm use flags from all arches except x86 so the clustering aspects of this ebuild should not be enabled and need to be stabilized at this time.  If you guys need anything let me know.
Comment 1 Eric Edgar (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-04-21 12:42:14 UTC
Updating this to the newest lvm2 with the vgid parsing bug fixed.
Comment 2 Chris Gianelloni (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-04-22 18:46:34 UTC
How do I test all of the clustering on x86?

To mark lvm2 stable here on x86 I also need to mark the following, correct?

M ccs/ccs-1.01.00.ebuild
M cman/cman-1.01.00.ebuild
M cman-headers/cman-headers-1.01.00.ebuild
M dlm/dlm-1.01.00.ebuild
M dlm-headers/dlm-headers-1.01.00.ebuild
M gulm/gulm-1.00.00.ebuild
M magma/magma-1.01.00.ebuild

I've tested device-mapper and lvm2 in a virtual machine and they appear fine, but the clustering stuff is beyond my extremely limited knowlege of lvm.  Some assistance would be appreciated.
Comment 3 Gustavo Zacarias (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-04-24 07:01:18 UTC
pwn3d!
hppa and sparc stable.
Chris: you'll probably need GFS and spread the thing across two or more boxes, to get an idea just see http://linux.sys-con.com/read/166309.htm
And that's the reason i became a biatch and said i doubted some arch teams really tested clustering as it should be done.
Comment 4 Eric Edgar (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-04-24 11:07:40 UTC
bumping this to 2.02.05 as it contains everything that .04-r1 had plus a fix for
invalidating a cache.

 "Invalidate cache if composition of VG changed externally"

This .05 release is the official response to the broken .03 and .04 version of lvm and was released to fix both the bug listed above and the 
"Fix vgid string termination in recent cache code." problem that the patch in .04-r1 resolved.


Comment 5 Chris Gianelloni (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-04-25 07:27:49 UTC
Added sparc and hppa back for comment #4
Comment 6 Gustavo Zacarias (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-04-25 11:48:31 UTC
sparc stable, i'll do hppa later.
Comment 7 Chris Gianelloni (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-04-25 17:08:00 UTC
Well, x86 is done... and for the record, you suck.  :P
Comment 8 Joshua Kinard gentoo-dev 2006-04-26 20:03:55 UTC
The mips team doth annoint this bug with the mips keyword of stability +1.
Comment 9 Markus Rothe (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-05-01 04:22:32 UTC
stable on ppc64
Comment 10 Gustavo Zacarias (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-05-03 07:25:16 UTC
hppa stable.
Comment 11 Matti Bickel (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-05-26 02:35:06 UTC
Marked stable by hansmi, thanks!
Comment 12 DEMAINE Benoît-Pierre, aka DoubleHP 2006-06-09 04:55:55 UTC
stable on Alpha (see bug #136172 )
Comment 13 Csaba Tóth 2006-07-06 10:47:35 UTC
Pls look at #132972 bug. I use ~amd64 now with the most newest packages, and it apperas there.
Comment 14 Michael Weyershäuser 2006-08-19 15:29:47 UTC
Taking this off our conscience since Kugelfang marked it stable on amd64 a while ago...
Comment 15 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-08-30 01:28:33 UTC
alpha done, arm/s390 don't have this even keyworded. Sending to ia64 folks.
Comment 16 Eric Edgar (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-09-07 09:43:10 UTC
2.02.06 is stable .. this is no longer needed...