Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 117680 - Kernel 2.6.15 missing udev >70 dependancy
Summary: Kernel 2.6.15 missing udev >70 dependancy
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: [OLD] Core system (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High normal (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo Kernel Bug Wranglers and Kernel Maintainers
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
: 118912 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks: 118671
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2006-01-03 16:50 UTC by Kevin Bowling
Modified: 2006-01-20 16:15 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Kevin Bowling 2006-01-03 16:50:02 UTC
After merging kernel 2.6.15 to my system, all event (/dev/input/event*) devices dissappered.  Updating udev to latest solved the problem.  Prevous config was 2.6.14/udev-70.
Comment 1 Greg Kroah-Hartman (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-01-03 17:01:29 UTC
The kernel has no udev dependancies, as you are running unstable in order
to get this version of the kernel, there is no reason you shouldn't have also
upgraded udev a while ago :)
Comment 2 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-01-13 12:53:44 UTC
*** Bug 118912 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 3 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-01-13 12:55:30 UTC
(In reply to comment #1)
> The kernel has no udev dependancies, as you are running unstable in order
> to get this version of the kernel, there is no reason you shouldn't have also
> upgraded udev a while ago :)

Sorry, this is no solution and 2.6.15 will go stable soon anyway.

Reopen.
Comment 4 Greg Kroah-Hartman (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-01-13 15:16:32 UTC
Then how do you propose to solve this?
Comment 5 Stefan Schweizer (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-01-13 15:29:26 UTC
We should just mark a newer udev release stable, or are there some serious bugs in the way?
Comment 6 Daniel Drake (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-01-13 15:29:36 UTC
I think he is saying we need to mark a newer udev stable. Assuming 070 doesn't work with 2.6.15, then this is correct.
Comment 7 Kelly Price 2006-01-13 17:17:37 UTC
I pushed mine up to 079 as a saftey net (of course, I have any kernel _rc* hard masked locally), and that so far hasn't given me problems.
Comment 8 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-01-13 18:38:10 UTC
Yeah, I meant we need to stabilize some later udev version. FWIW, I've been using 079 for three weeks and haven't had any issues with that one, but you must know better which version is 2.6.15 friendly and ready for stable. :-)

Thanks.
Comment 9 Greg Kroah-Hartman (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-01-13 20:00:34 UTC
I don't have a problem marking it stable, and just tried to, but there is a dependancy on a specific
version of baselayout that also must be stable, and it isn't marked as such yet :(

udev needs 1.11.14 or greater to work properly now.

So, care to add another blocking bug somewhere?
Comment 10 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-01-14 02:33:39 UTC
(In reply to comment #9)
> udev needs 1.11.14 or greater to work properly now.
> So, care to add another blocking bug somewhere?

Should go stable tomorrow, according to vapier's email on -dev ml. CCing him to confirm.
Comment 11 SpanKY gentoo-dev 2006-01-14 10:15:11 UTC
yes, i was going to do it sunday nite (EST)
Comment 12 Greg Kroah-Hartman (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-01-17 09:22:15 UTC
udev 079 is now marked stable.

Comment 13 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-01-20 16:15:04 UTC
*** Bug 119748 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***