Bug List: (This bug is not in your last search results)   Show last search results      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 117494
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Gentoo Security <security@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen <jaervosz@gentoo.org>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Flags: Requestee:
 
 
  ()

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
gpdf-2.10.0-r3.diff gpdf-2.10.0-r3.diff patch John N. Laliberte (RETIRED) 2006-01-18 09:34 0000 701 bytes Details | Diff
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 117494 depends on: Show dependency tree
Bug 117494 blocks:

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug


Description:   Opened: 2006-01-02 14:52 0000
Stub for now, details will follow.

------- Comment #1 From Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen 2006-01-03 07:43:50 0000 -------
See bug #117481 for details.

------- Comment #2 From Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen 2006-01-16 14:04:40 0000 -------
Gnome please provide an updated ebuild.

------- Comment #3 From John N. Laliberte (RETIRED) 2006-01-18 09:34:17 0000 -------
attaching diff'd ebuild.

I would commit, but want to run it by security guys since i'm removing a
previous security patch.

It looks like xpdf300_combined.diff includes the patch we previous applied
(gpdf-2.10.0-CAN-2005-3193.patch), as well as the new fixes.

I want to remove gpdf-2.10.0-CAN-2005-3193 and just use the one patch
( xpdf300_combined.diff renamed as gpdf-2.10.0-2006-01-16-xpdf.patch ).

Let me know if this is ok to commit.

Thanks

------- Comment #4 From John N. Laliberte (RETIRED) 2006-01-18 09:34:48 0000 -------
Created an attachment (id=77443) [details]
gpdf-2.10.0-r3.diff

------- Comment #5 From Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen 2006-01-25 13:29:07 0000 -------
This only an ebuild diff, provided the patch is fine, this is ok to commit.

------- Comment #6 From Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen 2006-01-27 09:56:15 0000 -------
GLSA is going out soon for the other packages if this is not fixed soon.

------- Comment #7 From John N. Laliberte (RETIRED) 2006-01-27 14:05:17 0000 -------
committed.

------- Comment #8 From Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen 2006-01-27 14:07:26 0000 -------
Arches please test and mark 2.10.0-r3 stable.

------- Comment #9 From John N. Laliberte (RETIRED) 2006-01-27 14:10:48 0000 -------
stable on x86

------- Comment #10 From Simon Stelling (RETIRED) 2006-01-27 14:20:00 0000 -------
i hereby bless you with the amd64 keyword

------- Comment #11 From Tobias Scherbaum 2006-01-28 02:17:25 0000 -------
ppc stable

------- Comment #12 From René Nussbaumer 2006-01-28 04:20:01 0000 -------
Stable on hppa

------- Comment #13 From Jason Wever (RETIRED) 2006-01-28 09:20:38 0000 -------
SPARC'd

------- Comment #14 From Markus Rothe 2006-01-28 11:12:18 0000 -------
stable on ppc64

------- Comment #15 From Jose Luis Rivero (yoswink) 2006-01-29 08:08:53 0000 -------
stable on alpha

------- Comment #16 From Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen 2006-01-30 14:39:47 0000 -------
GLSA 200601-17

Bug List: (This bug is not in your last search results)   Show last search results      Search page      Enter new bug