Bug List: (This bug is not in your last search results)   Show last search results      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 114313
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Gentoo Accessibility Team <accessibility@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Mark Loeser <halcy0n@gentoo.org>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
festival-gcc4.0.diff Fixes C++ stuff so that festival will compile with gcc 4 patch Meethune Bhowmick 2005-12-19 04:02 0000 33.01 KB Details | Diff
speech-tools-gcc4.0.diff Fixes C++ stuff so that speech-tools will compile with gcc 4 patch Meethune Bhowmick 2005-12-19 04:03 0000 5.14 KB Details | Diff
speech-tools_festival-gcc4.tar.gz Tarball with updated speech-tools and festival ebuild and patches application/octet-stream Meethune Bhowmick 2005-12-19 04:04 0000 32.49 KB Details
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 114313 depends on: 116030 Show dependency tree
Bug 114313 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug


Description:   Opened: 2005-12-02 20:26 0000
I am CC'ing sound as well because you both are listed as maintainers.

speech-tools has an evil conditional patch in it, so now every person on x86
upgrading is going to have broken headers when trying to compile festival
because speech-tools was not compiled using gcc-3.4.  The condition in the
ebuild shouldn't exist at all, and we are probably going to have to have to bump
stable on x86 to a new version so people who don't know what the issue is will
have it fixed.

Please remove the condition and let us know which version we should mark stable.

------- Comment #1 From Jakub Moc (RETIRED) 2005-12-04 04:51:59 0000 -------
*** Bug 114434 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #2 From Mark Loeser 2005-12-07 19:59:01 0000 -------
Okay, it looks like upstream for this is dead.  I'm unsure why the patches fail
and don't have the time to look into it really.  So can someone from
accessibility either fix the patches or get a replacement for this package?  Or
perhaps one of the other distros has a fix for this already.  Porting this for
gcc-4.0 is probably going to be a complete nightmare as well.

------- Comment #3 From Meethune Bhowmick 2005-12-19 04:02:04 0000 -------
Created an attachment (id=75080) [details]
Fixes C++ stuff so that it will compile with gcc 4

This will allow for the package to compile and run, but it throws all kinds of
deprecation warnings and whatnot when it compiles. So it could use some
cleaning.

------- Comment #4 From Meethune Bhowmick 2005-12-19 04:03:05 0000 -------
Created an attachment (id=75081) [details]
Fixes C++ stuff so that speech-tools will compile with gcc 4

------- Comment #5 From Meethune Bhowmick 2005-12-19 04:04:37 0000 -------
Created an attachment (id=75082) [details]
Tarball with updated speech-tools and festival ebuild and patches

------- Comment #6 From Meethune Bhowmick 2005-12-19 04:05:12 0000 -------
(In reply to comment #2)
> Okay, it looks like upstream for this is dead.  I'm unsure why the patches fail
> and don't have the time to look into it really.  So can someone from
> accessibility either fix the patches or get a replacement for this package?  Or
> perhaps one of the other distros has a fix for this already.  Porting this for
> gcc-4.0 is probably going to be a complete nightmare as well.

I pulled these patches from fedora cvs. These will allow you to compile
festival and speech-tools with gcc 4.0.2. It throws up a bunch of warnings so
it could use some more scrutiny, but I can echo "All your base are belong to
us" | festival --tts and it works :)

------- Comment #7 From Meethune Bhowmick 2005-12-19 04:07:52 0000 -------
Should my gcc 4 fixes be filed as a new bug?

------- Comment #8 From Mark Loeser 2006-01-21 22:21:18 0000 -------
Alright, keeping x86 on this isn't necessary until we have a fix.  Can someone
from accessibility let us know if we are keeping this package or if we are
going to p.mask it?  It doesn't look like its had a release in quite some time
now.

------- Comment #9 From William Hubbs 2006-09-08 21:05:22 0000 -------
This is resolved by 116030.  Closing.  Thanks.

Bug List: (This bug is not in your last search results)   Show last search results      Search page      Enter new bug