Bug List: (This bug is not in your last search results)   Show last search results      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 104603
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Gentoo Security <security@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Jean-François Brunette (RETIRED) <formula7@gentoo.org>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Flags: Requestee:
 
 
  ()

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 104603 depends on: Show dependency tree
Bug 104603 blocks:

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug

Description:   Opened: 2005-09-02 08:01 0000 
Alex Masterov has reported a vulnerability in Squid, which potentially can be
exploited by malicious people to cause a DoS (Denial of Service).

The vulnerability is caused due to an unspecified error in the
"sslConnectTimeout()" function after handling malformed requests. This may be
exploited to crash Squid.

Solution:
Apply patch for 2.5.STABLE10:
http://www.squid-cache.org/Versi...STABLE10-sslConnectTimeout.patch

------- Comment #1 From Jean-François Brunette (RETIRED) 2005-09-02 08:03:31 0000 ------- 
see bug #92254 for comments about GLSA

------- Comment #2 From Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen 2005-09-02 09:34:14 0000 ------- 
Fix is here:   
   
http://www.squid-cache.org/Versions/v2/2.5/bugs/squid-2.5.STABLE10-sslConnectTimeout.patch  
  
Some of the other patches might also have security value, especially:  
http://www.squid-cache.org/Versions/v2/2.5/bugs/#squid-2.5.STABLE10-STORE_PENDING 
http://www.squid-cache.org/Versions/v2/2.5/bugs/#squid-2.5.STABLE10-statHistAssert

------- Comment #3 From Alin Năstac 2005-09-02 14:54:47 0000 ------- 
fixed in squid-2.5.10-r2, marked as stable on x86.

------- Comment #4 From Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen 2005-09-02 21:41:43 0000 ------- 
Arches please test and mark stable.

------- Comment #5 From Markus Rothe 2005-09-03 00:33:10 0000 ------- 
stable on ppc64

------- Comment #6 From René Nussbaumer 2005-09-03 03:08:49 0000 ------- 
Stable on hppa

------- Comment #7 From Fernando J. Pereda (RETIRED) 2005-09-03 06:26:42 0000 ------- 
Stable on alpha

------- Comment #8 From Michael Hanselmann (hansmi) (RETIRED) 2005-09-03 08:09:06 0000 ------- 
Stable on ppc.

------- Comment #9 From Daniel Gryniewicz 2005-09-03 09:40:42 0000 ------- 
Stable on amd64

------- Comment #10 From Jason Wever (RETIRED) 2005-09-03 10:32:04 0000 ------- 
Stable on SPARC.

------- Comment #11 From Stefan Cornelius (RETIRED) 2005-09-03 10:42:33 0000 ------- 
All security supported arches stable, ready for GLSA vote. I tend to say yes
because we've released other GLSAs for remote DoS for squid before but i
wouldn't mind about no GLSA, though.

------- Comment #12 From Hardave Riar (RETIRED) 2005-09-04 00:30:19 0000 ------- 
Stable on mips.

------- Comment #13 From Thierry Carrez (RETIRED) 2005-09-04 10:59:39 0000 ------- 
I tend to vote yes too.

------- Comment #14 From Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen 2005-09-05 01:18:20 0000 ------- 
I vote YES.

------- Comment #15 From Tavis Ormandy (RETIRED) 2005-09-05 01:37:27 0000 ------- 
agreed, voting YES.

------- Comment #16 From Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen 2005-09-07 08:55:52 0000 ------- 
GLSA 200509-06

------- Comment #17 From Jean-François Brunette (RETIRED) 2005-09-07 10:51:44 0000 ------- 
*** Bug 105166 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Bug List: (This bug is not in your last search results)   Show last search results      Search page      Enter new bug